Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

A Breakdown of the O-Line play from Sunday


Ricky Spanish
 Share

Recommended Posts

1:00 is the LT allowed to lift up a defender from under his shoulder pads?


9:20 both LT and LG push two Panther defenders in the back to spring Elliott free for what would have been a tackle for a loss.

Very next play RT pushes Reddick down from behind allowing Zeke to run by for a first down. You can see Reddick throw his hands up in frustration. 
 

Next play Cooper pushes off Henderson causing him to stumble and fall right before the catch.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Eazy-E said:

1:00 is the LT allowed to lift up a defender from under his shoulder pads?


9:20 both LT and LG push two Panther defenders in the back to spring Elliott free for what would have been a tackle for a loss.

Very next play RT pushes Reddick down from behind allowing Zeke to run by for a first down. You can see Reddick throw his hands up in frustration. 
 

Next play Cooper pushes off Henderson causing him to stumble and fall right before the catch.

 

I didn't bother watching the Cowboy's stuff other than that one play. I was just going to get more angry.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Eazy-E said:

1:00 is the LT allowed to lift up a defender from under his shoulder pads?


9:20 both LT and LG push two Panther defenders in the back to spring Elliott free for what would have been a tackle for a loss.

Very next play RT pushes Reddick down from behind allowing Zeke to run by for a first down. You can see Reddick throw his hands up in frustration. 
 

Next play Cooper pushes off Henderson causing him to stumble and fall right before the catch.

 

1 and 920 are legal plays at all levels of football 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Eazy-E said:

1:00 is the LT allowed to lift up a defender from under his shoulder pads?


9:20 both LT and LG push two Panther defenders in the back to spring Elliott free for what would have been a tackle for a loss.

Very next play RT pushes Reddick down from behind allowing Zeke to run by for a first down. You can see Reddick throw his hands up in frustration. 
 

Next play Cooper pushes off Henderson causing him to stumble and fall right before the catch.

 

ART. 1 . . . The free-blocking zone is a rectangular area extending laterally 4 yards either side of the spot of the snap and 3 yards behind each line of scrimmage. A player is in the free-blocking zone when any part of his body is in the zone at the snap.

ART. 2 . . . Blocking below the waist is permitted in the free-blocking zone when the following conditions are met:

a. All players involved in the blocking are on the line of scrimmage and in the zone at the snap.

b. The contact is in the zone.

ART. 3 . . . Clipping is permitted in the free-blocking zone when the following conditions are met:

a. By offensive linemen who are on the line of scrimmage and in the zone at the snap.

b. Against defensive players who are on the line of scrimmage and in the zone at the snap.

c. The contact is in the zone.


ART. 4 . . . Blocking in the back is permitted in the free-blocking zone when the following conditions are met:


a. By offensive linemen who are on the line of scrimmage and in the zone at the snap.

b. Against defensive players who are in the zone at the snap.

c. The contact is in the zone.

ART. 5 . . . The free-blocking zone disintegrates and the exception for a player to block below the waist and/or the exception for an offensive lineman to clip and/or block in the back is not to continue after the ball has left the zone

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Trying not to play the what if game about Slater but it's impossible not to consider. I'm optimistic and I think we can adjust to some things but the dollar store Dave style approach to our oline is a story that just never seems to go away for the Panthers. I expect big moves and that to be our top priority next year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

He looked amazing last night.   I feel this is going to bite us in the ass

Right after Sewell got picked, I thought, ok, we will probably draft Slater. Some people thought he might be more ready than Sewell. I was going to be happy with it, but then they went Horn. Jaycee will probably be a great player, but I would feel much better with both a solid LT and RT.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Oh good lord Interest doesn't mean interest in making a bad trade to take the player, that's why I had such a long post, to accurately describe why those are two different things, but you don't like to listen to that stuff.  Being interested in a player doesn't live in a vacuum. It's very simple... there isn't a #1 draft pick type of grade on any of these QB's, if there was, we'd just take them.  You can't bluff a pick everyone knows you won't make, and trying to trade the pick is the CLEAR signal that you're not taking the QB. Just because the Raiders would have interest, doesn't mean they're going to bail us out of a situation we don't want to be in, they'd be smart about it and just sit put, let us take a non QB as we'd be telling the world we're not taking one just by trying to trade the pick, and then they'd take him at #2 (either with their own pick or by trading less to get that one). Oh, and your point of "if nobody is willing to make the trade, you obviously just take the best QB" is quite literally the dumbest thing I've ever read on here. If nobody is willing to trade up to take the QB, then it's OBVIOUS that the QB isn't worth taking with that pick, so OBVIOUSLY taking the best QB there is just OBVIOUSLY stupid and a bad pick. The moral of it is if there is a QB worth taking, we're taking them and not making the trade.  If there isn't a QB worth taking there, nobody is trading up to #1 to take one, we just showed the NFL how bad of an idea that is 2 years ago, it's really not hard to see. You keep making up this mythical situation where there is a QB who has shown to be worth trading up to #1 for and we'll be able to leverage that into a trade.  But we're the most QB needy team in the league, if we end up with the #1 pick, either we are taking a QB #1 or no QB is going #1 unless we get VERY lucky and two teams in the Top 5 fall in love with one prospect and we can play them off each other and fleece one of them. But again, I can't see that happening, as if there was a QB worthy of that, we're just taking him ourselves.
    • Sanders is with Tom Brady brand and that's his mentor. The Raiders owner was with Sanders taking pics at a Vegas game together.   It doesn't take much to connect the dots that Vegas will be interested in Sanders as their franchise QB. Oh yeah and guess who hasa small ownership stake in the Raiders Tom Brady.   I guess this is just another made up Madden idea by me huh?
    • Bro I don't mind debating you, but did you really have to write all that to get your point across.   This isn't Madden. If you have the #1 pick you literally control your own destiny. If nobody wants to trade which I have a hard time believing they won't then you obviously take the best QB.   I think we will have suitors. If that's Madden then so be it.
×
×
  • Create New...