Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What did they see in Darnold?

GoobyPls

By GoobyPls,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

trueblade Grand Master

trueblade

Posted
Posted

Straight from Rhule's mouth:

Quote

"We were sitting there one day on defense, and I can't remember (exactly) what we were watching, we were watching a cut up, and Sam was playing on the other side of the ball, and a couple times he made some throws, and Phil Snow, our defensive coordinator, was like, 'Man, that kid looks like Matt Stafford.' And so, we put a couple games on – and this is the defensive staff -- and they were all like, 'You know what, every game we watch, he makes a couple of big-time plays, and there has to be some meat on the bone there,' " Rhule said. "So, kind of went through the process and kept watching him and going back and watching him in college and watching his pro day and then going back and watching his first year in a different offense and the second year and his third year. When the compensation was enough where we didn't have to give up what we thought was too much that [it] would hurt our team and a chance to get him here, we'd watched so much tape on him that we saw enough shining moments."

Bolding and underling added by me.

source: https://www.nfl.com/news/matt-rhule-on-why-panthers-didn-t-pick-qb-in-draft-i-just-believe-in-sam-darnold

  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
iamhubby1 Veteran

iamhubby1

Posted
Posted
10 minutes ago, CanePantherHornet said:

Exactly. For some reason they think they can contend now so they're desperately swinging at the fences and compromising our future in the process.

 

Rhule wanted to start a winning culture right away. Going with an established  QB should have helped with that. It didn't. 

 

We are 7 games into the 2nd year of a rebuild. We have not compromised the future.

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted
22 minutes ago, SmokinwithWilly said:

Darnlod has the tools to be a good NFL QB. Arm talent, mobility and he's shown flashes of having "it" as we saw in the Vikings game with that 4th quarter comeback.

 

Lot of players have for tools to be good and aren’t.  The draft is full of them and most are never to really be heard of or ever become noteworthy. 

Sam experiment shouldn’t of ended when the Jets dumped him.   His path back to a starting job should of been a long one. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
R2-D2 Apprentice

R2-D2

Posted
Posted

Has a good arm and ruhle was impressed with his personal interview during his coaching interview with the jets.

Thought was he could be a tannehill style reclamation project. Had similar backgrounds in that neither played as much quarterback growing up as most top tier prospects. Thought was he could execute in a good offense. 
 

obviously everything is falling apart at this point though. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
raleigh-panther Grand Master

raleigh-panther

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, GoobyPls said:

To justify trading a second round pick for him?

 

He’s never been remotely good, by every advanced metric he was not just bad but the worst starting QB over the last 3 seasons. Anyone who saw the jets play last season would tell you Flacco was their best QB and he’s washed up.

I can’t believe people were falling for that 3-0 start, he was executing an elementary level offense and still missing wide open receivers, he wasn’t being exposed cause the defense was on a record pace in terms of yards, first downs and other metrics.

They saw what they wanted to see 

not the reality 

not his history 

they saw what supported their narrative particularly after they screwed the pouch on draft position and other veteran QBs 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
kungfoodude Grand Master

kungfoodude

Posted
Posted
12 minutes ago, raleigh-panther said:

They saw what they wanted to see 

not the reality 

not his history 

they saw what supported their narrative particularly after they screwed the pouch on draft position and other veteran QBs 

Pretty much this.

Everyone who still believes he has the talent or believes there is still hope, this is you. If you couldn't see if before the season, if you couldn't see it in the first three games, if you couldn't see it last four games.....you can't see it.

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Cary Kollins Experienced

Cary Kollins

Posted
Posted (edited)
50 minutes ago, stbugs said:

Don’t agree that it was the same as Teddy. Teddy was seen as a stop gap that knew Brady’s offense, but I think in Sam they saw future franchise potential.

I assume they saw some of the great plays, like some he had this year as well and thought they could make him consistent. Same with the folks in here wanting PJ. They remember that one pass to Moore against the Lions and his one good pass yesterday. Problem is that strong armed QBs like Teddy and PJ can make those wow throws but overall they don’t make enough consistent plays.


Teddy was signed to a three year $63 million deal with $33 million guaranteed. 
 

They thought Teddy would be the guy because reasons. 
 

Darnold only had his fifth year option picked up, which of course now looks like a terrible decision.

Edited by Cary Kollins
Link to comment
Share on other sites
SetfreexX Mentor

SetfreexX

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, Cary Kollins said:

Seems like the same poo they saw in Teddy…hope and a prayer that he could turn into a franchise QB with proper coaching and talent.

 

Turns out the staff are either poor evaluators or poor coaches, or both.

I would say there was a level of ego / naivety in the sense that AT THE HIGHEST level they could get by with JAG at the SINGLE MOST IMPORTANT POSITION IN THE NFL. 

I will give them credit for rebuilding the defense as quickly as they have and I fully anticipated we'd start to add on the offense as it was in better shape than the defense. This coming off-season is that time; however I think the FINALLY understand that you can't do anything worthwhile without premium talent ala investing a high draft pick or signing / trading for a viable franchise QB which is a situation that basically never presents itself.  

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
ImaginaryKev Grand Master

ImaginaryKev

Posted
Posted

Sam looks broken, he had some nice traits and flashes of the type of play the modern NFL covets bc at this point you can't be confident. I actually think the best thing is to keep him in the lineup if you're not signing or trading for anyone and see if you can coach it out of him. I mean, you ALREADY picked up his 5th year option, don't back down now. 

But yeah, right now it seems the coaching staff was overconfident in their ability to coach offense and it shows Sundays

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
AU-panther Mentor

AU-panther

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, GoobyPls said:

To justify trading a second round pick for him?

 

He’s never been remotely good, by every advanced metric he was not just bad but the worst starting QB over the last 3 seasons. Anyone who saw the jets play last season would tell you Flacco was their best QB and he’s washed up.

I can’t believe people were falling for that 3-0 start, he was executing an elementary level offense and still missing wide open receivers, he wasn’t being exposed cause the defense was on a record pace in terms of yards, first downs and other metrics.

They saw tools.  He is an above average athlete and he has some arm talent, although not the accuracy.

If you look at our other free agency signings,  and even our draft classes, you can see a theme with this staff, they definitely like players with tools, measurables, or positive traits.

Cam Erving, Darnold, Henderson, all first rounders, you don't get drafted in the 1st round unless you have some good tools.  Even Elflein  was drafted relatively high for a center and was consider to have good "traits".

I think this staff believes they can take talented players and make them better players.  Honestly it might be their biggest downfall and might be leftover from them being college coaches.

With high school kids you are looking for best athletes and then you turn them into football players.  At this level, once a player has been in the league a few years, the chance of you getting more of them than other NFL staffs is rather slim.

 

 

 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • ForJimmy
      Media touting tonight as The Shedaur Show

      By ForJimmy · Posted

      I think he did a solid job.  Honestly I liked his post game interview the best.  He gave himself a C and said he left a lot out on the field.  That kind of attitude can carry him far.
    • kungfoodude
      Coach asked about Coker!!

      By kungfoodude · Posted

      This is lacking a fairly considerable amount of context. For one, Adams(age 22) started 12 of 16 games, had 38 rec, 446 yds and 3 TD's on 66 targets(18 less, with 2 less games started). The main thing missing here is that the top two WR's for Green Bay that year combined for about 2800 yds and 25 TD's. Now if you want to throw a more accurate dart at Adams, take a look at year two. This year the production was spread around considerably and Adams didn't stand out from that pack(pun not intended).  So, if XL struggles mightily this season, I would probably keep that comparison in your quiver to counter argue. I would suggest that I don't think that scenario is probably very accurate for most HOF caliber WR's taken in the first round over the past 15 or so years. Adams was the 89th pick overall, as well. A little different hill to climb than XL, although not massively.
    • CRA
      Monday practice tweets

      By CRA · Posted

      to clarify I am not referring to Will Levis.  Not knowingly.   I just made that up and tried to use a reasonable guesstimate of what else was done.  That sounded in the ballpark.  At one time I did look it all up and there were several teams that had much more successful days downfield.   If that happened to be Levis' actual numbers than it's more of a lucky coincidence.  If memory serves, it wasn't just Will Levis that brought the claim into question, it was SEVERAL teams had better days.  and you are missing my entire point of the subjective nature of it all.  If PFF employee Doug watched Bryce's film and then used his same unique subjective vantage point to grade all 31 other starting QBs.  Then dumped into into a spread sheet, it would a subjective Doug take but at least it would be a level uniform subjectivity.   The grades are done by various people.  All watching and applying their own subjective view to a play.  Everyone isn't going to grade incompletions out the same.  Or completions.   So when you dump it all into a spread sheet and hit sort.....it's not actually a statement of fact as portrayed.  Which is why you sometimes get some head scratching stuff.  I'm not reframing anything.   I don't think.  I just wasn't going to look it all back up so I was talking vaguely off the general issue I have with PFF and treating any random claim they make as the truth. 
×
×
  • Create New...