Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

They just don't get it....


Jmac
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Jmac said:

I don't care who the fug they sign as QB. This team is going NOWHERE with the Oline they put on the field season after season. This year, next year, or five years from now. 

Putting the horse before the cart for how many seasons now? They still can't understand that the front five on the Oline is what oils the engine. Don't know what the fug it will take to get that message across.

They persist in ignoring the most important cog on any offense besides the QB.

 

OK....AND?  So you go out and make the move that is available RIGHT NOW, which is getting one of the top 5 QBs in the game, who is only 25 years old.  Then you take your considerable salary cap space moving forward and you build him an o-line.  Hell, the Rams will not have a first round pick for 10 damn years, and they seem to be doing just fine building a successful team around their franchise QB.  

  • Pie 9
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, joemac said:

OK....AND?  So you go out and make the move that is available RIGHT NOW, which is getting one of the top 5 QBs in the game, who is only 25 years old.  Then you take your considerable salary cap space moving forward and you build him an o-line.  Hell, the Rams will not have a first round pick for 10 damn years, and they seem to be doing just fine building a successful team around their franchise QB.  

Fine...then its time for this team to sh%t or get off the pot. You want Watson, then find some way to flush the oline (minus Molton) and restock the shelves. No more turning a bind eye.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Jmac said:

I don't care who the fug they sign as QB. This team is going NOWHERE with the Oline they put on the field season after season. This year, next year, or five years from now. 

Putting the horse before the cart for how many seasons now? They still can't understand that the front five on the Oline is what oils the engine. Don't know what the fug it will take to get that message across.

They persist in ignoring the most important cog on any offense besides the QB.

 

DW is a franchise QB. You get him now knowing you’re set at QB for a decade plus and focus your attention on fixing the oline. 

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Jmac said:

Fine...then its time for this team to sh%t or get off the pot. You want Watson, then find some way to flush the oline (minus Molton) and restock the shelves. No more turning a bind eye.

Absolutely with you there dude.  No matter who is playing QB, they need to make it priority number 1 to fix this goddamn putrid o line. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • OL then RB would make heads explode but its might not be too unlikely 
    • Wonder if we draft a RB. Seems like a lot of eggs in Brooks’ basket right now.  And the OL, no kidding. If that running game goes to hell with what we have at QB, you can forget competing. It is so much more important than sticking another wideout on the field. Take your wideout later. 
    • I have lots of different thoughts on it. This argument, the primary thing is I don’t like seeing him or anyone, being convicted on hearsay and/or pure speculation. Which some are doing.  I don’t care That much about defending Morgan as I do about the criticism being fair minded.    You sort of assert that Dan was just a yes man. I don’t think we know if he ever pushed back against Fitterer but I have this instinct thing that needs me to satisfy the question of: if Tepper was so down on a Fitterer as to fire him, why in the world would he hire his carbon copy? I guess maybe he wanted a yes man.Like I said, lots of different thoughts.     I am just not gonna judge him that harshly based only on speculation. I am sticking with what he has done starting when he was hired as GM. Maybe I am more lenient because the first season for him and Canales, I gave both a pass. Said I would judge them after the first year. Stuck to it. If you can get to the reality that neither were ready for the job and say okay give them a year get their feet wet, it looks a lot better.    And we are not bound to Bryce yet. Yes, for yet another fuging year he can probably marginally improve and slide by like he has been doing. But if they add even more people and he regresses? I think we could see some relief.    The QB room? As I understand it, Pickett was Canales’ choice. If we need to blame people for poo. In a sense, he is very Bryce like. So makes a good plug in. I get that a little bit. We still have the draft. If they do better than Jake Plummer or Hooker I’ll know they are trying.   
×
×
  • Create New...