Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

A message from Haason


1989
 Share

Recommended Posts

I’m not an auto mechanic but I still know how to rebuild a car engine and do most things a mechanic can do.

Most people aren’t born with the athletic gifts to become professional athletes. Just because they’re not pro ball players doesn’t mean they don’t know what they’re talking about.

Some fans understand offensive and defensive football concepts and can watch games and clearly see right and wrong / good and bad. Why do you think analytics have become so prevalent in sports. I mean people pay money for PFF for fugs sake.
 

I could be the smartest football person out there but if I’m not a freak of nature athlete I’m never going to become a professional football player. There are plenty of NFL players that get by on nothing more than their athleticism and are dumber than a box of rocks when it come to understanding football. That’s why guys flame out all the time after getting drafted high because they blew people away at the combine but still can’t grasp their playbooks after 4 years.

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can understand his frustration but calling out fans isn't helping matters either. Just ten years ago you would be lucky to see more than a couple Panthers fans out and about during an away game. At the end of the day this a business driven by fans investments so might be worth considering before posting 🤷‍♂️

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, frankw said:

I can understand his frustration but calling out fans isn't helping matters either. Just ten years ago you would be lucky to see more than a couple Panthers fans out and about during an away game. At the end of the day this a business driven by fans investments so might be worth considering before posting 🤷‍♂️

Yeah like Honey Badger calling out Chiefs fans but guess what all fans know y’all’s defense sucks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

It was a Twatter post so he was undoubtedly getting trolled and it was clearly successful.

Zero idea why people still use Twatter.

I wouldn't if I was a public professional figure. The internet is easy when you have anonymity both ways but brutal if not.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, Waldo said:

So many possibilities here. Wonder what set him off?

Maybe he read some of frankw's "critiques"?  😉

But seriously, I'm curious, too.

I would HOPE he's not defending the O-Line because if he is, he's being loyal to a fault here (emphasis on FAULT) because they've been terrible.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
    • adamantium? adam? adam thielen super bowl game winning catch ?
×
×
  • Create New...