Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Panthers….. not an attractive destination for top shelf talent?


TheBigKat
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, BrianS said:

I love your positivity, but sir, I don't think there is a QB in this league who would willingly come here to play behind this line.  It really is on course to be historically awful.  If the line was just average, it would be a very different story.

Why would Brady go to the Bucs if this was a reason not to sign? Winston was the 3rd most sacked QB in the league. The line was terrible. Enter Brady…all of a sudden the line is one of the best in the league. Great QBs elevate everyone. Plenty of free agents and trade targets to patch those holes. 
 

Carolina is an attractive destination for 3 reasons. 
 

#1 - QBs like playing in good weather. CAR has that for most of the season.

#2 - QBs always want a top D to fall back on if the offense isn’t humming. CAR defense should be a top 5 unit for years. 

#3 - All players want to play for an aggressive GM and a wealthy owner. It means they’ll get paid and the supporting cast will get paid as well. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, cookinbrak said:

Stephen Davis.

Mike Wahle

Ricky Proehl

OP knows about as much about football as my cat knows about gardening.

you're calling Stephen Davis, Ricky Parole and Mike one tendon left in his shoulder Wahle top flight FAs that we had to overpay for?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, Riverboat Ron said:

I honestly think the NFL needs to do something about contracts in states with different tax laws. Ex. Florida with no income tax. It gives an unfair advantage to those teams and should be reflected directly on the salary cap. It’s basically free money to bribe a player to play for the exact same cap hit as a player in North Carolina.
 

On the flip side California has a huge income tax but offers a market in which players can earn extra through sponsorship. It’s basically anyone not in a big market or Florida that is left out in the cold.

The state income tax is an advantage but only for half the NFL season for FL players as they pay state income tax when they are on "away" games in the states they play in.

 

That's why Toronto/Vancouver struggled so badly to get top talent in the past being in Canada, if you think US taxes are bad, go north a bit

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This narrative regarding free agents and the Panthers is as tiresome, oversimplified, and misrepresented as the political ones that pollute the air waves during election seasons.

This is Fitterer's first year as Carolina's GM, Rhule's second year as the coach, and Tepper's third year as the owner. The fact that there has been instability at the three major positions of power for the football team makes it very difficult for sensible fans to not make sweeping generalizations about their combined competence. This means that trying to figure out their influence on the situation is... well... pointless.

With that being the case, let's go back a little bit. Seeing as how this is brought up yearly, we can assume it's been going on for a long, long time. In 2011, we get a new coach and draft a new QB. Why would a top shelf free agent want to come to the worst team from the previous season? Combine this with the fact that Hurney was so bad with money that he twice maneuvered the team into salary cap Hell, and now we see that we're missing two of the primary motivators for a player: Ws and dollars.

Gettleman's era was literally, from start to finish, an exercise in getting the team out of the cap hell that Hurney put it into. There was no money. As soon as the books were cleaned up, they brought Hurney back. What did he do with the now available money? Signed Dontari Poe (2018), Eric Reid (2018), Gerald McCoy (2019), Bruce Irvin (2019), and Matt Paradis (2021). How good was the 2019 defense? Historically bad. How good has Matt Paradis been? About as solid as Matt Kalil was.

Like... I get it. Most folks don't care how the sausage is made, so long as it's palatable to them. I just wish they didn't have to start making up bullshit. 😕

Edited by Icege
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Squid Game said:

Who’s the head coach here in Carolina? A college coach that brought all of his friends from college to the NFL. Why did you think Luke Kuechly decided to retire? Luke then left after a year being a scout. 

how dare you use third level thinking.... Mike from Shelby wants us to believe that he is at a trout pond right now, he left for fishing

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, TheBigKat said:

small market/limited marketing opportunities?

I understand your intention, but the Panthers and the Carolinas area they represent are not "small market". The more times that passionate fans continue to repeat this incorrect perception, the more that perception become actual reality with the casual crowd and sports writers.

"not as wide-spread supportive fanbase vs, let's say, the packers?".... is probably more in line with where you were going.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Exactly what I was going to say. Brady seems to be taking a page out of Olsen's playbook, which is probably a good thing. They'll probably get around to giving Brady an Emmy one day, and he should thank Olsen for giving him the blueprint for success.
    • In before: "XL sucks, there is no hope." "As long as we have Bryce, none of this matters." My response: "It's X, not XL...we're not discussing apparel sizes, or we'd have to consider XS."  
    • Alain Pierre provides some food for thought on Last Word On Sports regarding Xavier Legette, and his article, though specifically on X, kind of puts me in the mind of QBs being overdrafted and put into situations that they're not prepared for, some ultimately failing due to drafting missteps by front offices who don't necessarily view prospective players within the contextual importance that situations demand.  At this point, Legette looks like a failure in reference to expectations, of not only what a consistently productive NFL receiver looks like, but a first round pick (which he obviously should never have been). But the story on X isn't necessarily completely over. Damn. I seem to be experiencing deja vu...It wasn't X's fault that he was overdrafted, that was a choice by an FO that obviously downplayed actual realized skill vs outstanding measurables and upside. Sure, the FO was impressed by X's one-year feats during his senior season at South Carolina, but it was the NFL god, RAS (a.k.a. Raw Athletic Score), that had Dave Canales's and Dan Morgan's jaws dropping in amazement at the sight of X running around in underwear at the Combine...   "At 6-foot-3 and over 220 pounds, Legette brought rare athletic upside to the position. His breakout season at South Carolina showed flashes of dominance that NFL teams dream of. Projecting forward, many scouts compared his physical profile to D.K. Metcalf, and the Panthers clearly believed they could develop him into a true wide receiver 1 over time. The issue was never his talent. The issue was the timeline. Just a few picks later, the Chargers selected Ladd McConkey, a receiver who may have lacked Xavier Legette’s physical ceiling but entered the league far more technically refined. McConkey immediately showed advanced route discipline, leverage awareness, good pacing, and separation ability.  Bryce Young’s game has always depended on timing and anticipation. His best football at Alabama came with receivers capable of winning through precision rather than pure athleticism. Jameson Williams and John Metchie III were excellent route runners and were able to get drafted in 2022. McConkey naturally fit that style of play. Legette, meanwhile, needed significant development in the exact areas where Bryce Young needed help. The Panthers drafted traits when Bryce Young needed reliability."   Yes, the FO was guilty. The good thing is that the execs appear to be improving. Some of that may be attributed to the hiring of Eric Eager (who was hired right after the Xavier Legette draft). Eager seems to have helped the Panthers FO fine-tune their analytical progress, and, at least on paper, they acquired players with a lot of value during the last draft in regards to actually (what I'll refer to as) "underdrafting" talent relative to their position with value already built in.  Look at Chris Brazzell: He may be more of the quintessential project receiver who was arguably more or less just as raw as Legette was when he was drafted, and with a relatively high RAS as well. The notable difference is value, as Brazzell was a round three pick and Legette was a first rounder.    "Unlike the Xavier Legette situation, Carolina’s environment for Brazzell is completely different. "The Panthers are not asking a raw receiver prospect to stabilize this offense for Bryce Young. "Brazzell enters a much healthier developmental situation with far less pressure. With Tetairoa McMillan established as the primary target and Jalen Coker continuing to settle as the number 2 option...Xavier Legette, Metchie III, and Jimmy Horn Jr. are also still in this rotation, fighting for reps. "It gives Carolina something they failed to give Legette when they drafted him: A developmental runway. "Xavier Legette entered the league with expectations attached to a first-round pick and an offense desperate for answers. Brazzell enters a room where he can spend a year working on his route running, learning the playbook, and earning snaps gradually rather than being asked to become part of Bryce Young’s solution immediately. "And truthfully, Brazzell needs that time coming out of college. Despite his elite physical tools, many evaluators have several concerns about his overall polish as a receiver. "His route tree at Tennessee was viewed as fairly limited due to the type of offense that they run. The receivers are expected to run a lot of choice routes, which are dictated by the placement of the defenders. It doesn’t require technical route-running and an understanding of the playbook needed at the NFL level...   "Context changes significantly when expectations change. "The Panthers are not depending on Brazzell to save the offense. They can allow him to develop slowly, expand his route tree, improve his technical refinement, and learn behind a much more stable receiver room... "Traits become much easier to bet on when patience is built into the plan."   It's all about understanding your situation. I don't agree that it's an inherently difficult choice like the author is suggesting in the following excerpt. At the very least, I think that it should be easier as long as all parties involved stay levelheaded and true to their process.    "That is what makes these draft decisions so difficult. "Every front office believes it can find the next Metcalf, Owens, or Marshall. Sometimes they do. More often, they are betting on a development path that may take years to complete. "The challenge is understanding what your offense needs right now. "If a team has patience, stability, and a quarterback capable of carrying the offense while a receiver develops, betting on traits can make sense. But if a young quarterback needs immediate help, there is a strong argument for prioritizing the receiver who already knows how to separate, create throwing , and earn trust from day one. "That’s why the Xavier Legette-Ladd McConkey debate remains so fascinating. "It was never really a discussion about talent. It was a discussion about timing."   For me, Ladd McConkey was talented enough in his own right, that the gap--the upside--was never as big as people are suggesting between not only McConkey and Legette, but McConkey and other receivers drafted in the first round during that draft. The technique divide between Ladd and X was pretty stark though, as was the roughly 35 pounds, but the speed was identical, the maybe 1½ height difference isn't huge (6' and 6'1"), and it may surprise some that Ladd's RAS (9.34) was also enough to put him in the top 10 percent of receivers since 1987. There is an argument that he would've been a better pick for Bryce and the Panthers, regardless of timeline and talent. But, I still appreciate the thesis (if you will) of the article, as it still provides some hope--perhaps a glimmer at this point, that X's RAS may finally translate to the NFL given more time, but, perhaps more importantly, it explains how Dan Morgan and company are showing improvement, even if it appears somewhat understated. My hope is that continued improvement is palpable by this time next year. https://lastwordonsports.com/nfl/2026/05/30/xavier-legette-draft-lessons/#google_vignette        
×
×
  • Create New...