Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Who do you BLAME THE MOST?


Admiral Ackbar
 Share

Who is THE MOST to blame for Sam Darnold?  

111 members have voted

  1. 1. Who is the MOST to blame for the Sam Darnold Experience?

    • Rhule
      72
    • Tepper
      21
    • Brady
      30
    • Fitterer
      6
    • Panthers fans for being hornswoggled into thinking this was even an a viable choice...
      6


Recommended Posts

I hate I can't make this a completely different topic...But yall realized we got rid of Teddy B because he couldn't win close games....BUT WE CANT EVEN GET CLOSE TO A CLOSE GAME TO LOSE NOW!!!..I blame the coaches and the fans who actually thought Sam Darnold would be better than Teddy B...and the ones who hate on Cam Newton too...yall garbage too...Cam NEVERRRRRRRR played this bad and yall act like he was trash....

  • Pie 2
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Darnold? He threw three balls into the DL hands and threw three INTS. Brady isn’t the problem. The offense at least looked decent last year with TB and idt Teddy is good. I just think unfortunately SD is worse. 
 

There are two other phases of the team that have been very good. 

Edited by unicar15
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Chaos said:

Rhule for me - you can't forge a winning NFL product with Baylor and Temple cast-offs.

That's one of my biggest issues with Rhule, you're not going to win in the NFL with a bunch of average players. Rhule still thinks this the Big XII and you can coach up everybody, you need talent at the highest level.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

All of them.  Tepper for getting a green college coach.  Rhule for getting a green college OC, Fitterer for not devoting more resources to fixing the OL.  Poo rolls downhill and it's only picking up steam.  Again, FANS...you know people who don't get paid good money to do this for a living, saw this poo show coming months ago.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I can't help but think that you are equating physical attributes alone with wins. I don't subscribe to that thought. No one will argue that Young has a strong arm, but he makes up for it in other ways. The real limitation for him is he needs good route runners with great hands. That's why Young was so good at the end of the 24 season. Thielen and Coker were perfect receivers for him and he had his best games with them. Not having them to start the 25 season hurt. Look at the first 10 games in 25 with a rookie receiver and no Coker and then look at the final 7 games with a more experienced rookie and Coker back and there is a telling difference in Young's performance. Prior to week 10, Young had 1 game with a QB rating above 100, 2 games with a rating above 90 and 6 games with a rating below 90. In the last 7 games with Coker back, Young had 3 games with a QB rating above 100, 2 games with a rating above 90 and only 2 games with a rating below 90. The tools a QB has to work with matter more than their arm strength.  To go back to Darnold and Stafford, yes they both have great arm strength but neither had much success with that alone. As I already pointed out, Stafford, even with a canon for an arm, only had 4 winning seasons in his first 12 years. It was only when he went to the right environment that he had true success.
    • I don't love this role for him if I'm being totally honest The pregame show is much more flash than substance and doesn't seem like the right fit for what Luke would bring to the table, and that's his vision of the game. I'd like to see him do something where it more involves him breaking down film and explaining what he's seeing out there, as he sees the game in a way very few ever have.
×
×
  • Create New...