Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Matt "analytics" Rhule should NEVER have final say on personnel


TheBigKat
 Share

Recommended Posts

He's a good coach, he ain't Belichick to have final say on personnel and we should not give him Chip Kelly leeway to make personnel decisions.

 

We are winning today not because of Rhule, he had Fitterer bring in Matt TRASH Barkley, we are winning today because Mr. Tepper threw a poo fest and made the team bring in Cam.

 

Cam didn't do it on his own but Cam gave this team HOPE, he has energized the franchise. 

 

The Sam Darnold era is OVER and I am happy that this move will demonstrate that Rhule needs to stick with coaching or enjoy going back to college

 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rhule should not have total control. He doesn't know what the fug he's doing in QB evaluations or O-line evaluations. 

One thing that he definitely needs to learn is that you can't always go for the versatile athlete who is good at many things but master at nothing. Sometimes the expert at one thing is absolutely what you need. Just my opinion.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Castavar said:

This definitely had the feeling of a Tepper signing than a Rhule signing. Rhule was content with PJ and Matt fuggin Barkley as our QBs the rest of the year until Tepper probably cursed them TF out to bring Cam back.

While we don't know for certain, Cam said it was Rhule who called him.  My guess is that if Rhule didn't want him at all, then it would have been the GM calling.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I mean, yes, there is a difference between looking at a box score and watching film.  But PFF has a big subjective aspect to some of their grades.  That's how you get a 2/4 being better than 3/5 with a TD.  You aren't using stats at that point or factual events, but subjective analysis of plays.   And it's not like it is the same subjective analysis applying across all the players.   Same guy grading BY's incompletions (which are putting him over the top) isn't grading everyone else's incompletions and completions.  So it's different subjective takes/viewpoints applied.  There is no way everyone at PFF views grading out a play the same.  Then it all dumps into the same spreadsheet.  Hit the sort button.  Sometimes I feel it gets really weird and and collective data starts saying some weird stuff that just isn't true.   
    • Yeah, Sanders had a very nice debut preseason performance but the folks acting like he's arrived based on that performance are getting way out ahead of themselves.
    • I won't be surprised if Graham disappoints. Maybe not outright bust but never lives up to his draft status. The more I watched him at Michigan the more I came away impressed by the other Michigan DT. I think he might be the real player. Usually when you have two high level prospects in the same college unit one of them ends up getting fraud checked in the NFL as being largely carried by the other guy. Peppers and Ryan Sims at UNC comes to mind. Lavar Arrington and Courtney Brown at Penn State, etc.
×
×
  • Create New...