Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Matt "analytics" Rhule should NEVER have final say on personnel


TheBigKat
 Share

Recommended Posts

He's a good coach, he ain't Belichick to have final say on personnel and we should not give him Chip Kelly leeway to make personnel decisions.

 

We are winning today not because of Rhule, he had Fitterer bring in Matt TRASH Barkley, we are winning today because Mr. Tepper threw a poo fest and made the team bring in Cam.

 

Cam didn't do it on his own but Cam gave this team HOPE, he has energized the franchise. 

 

The Sam Darnold era is OVER and I am happy that this move will demonstrate that Rhule needs to stick with coaching or enjoy going back to college

 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rhule should not have total control. He doesn't know what the fug he's doing in QB evaluations or O-line evaluations. 

One thing that he definitely needs to learn is that you can't always go for the versatile athlete who is good at many things but master at nothing. Sometimes the expert at one thing is absolutely what you need. Just my opinion.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Castavar said:

This definitely had the feeling of a Tepper signing than a Rhule signing. Rhule was content with PJ and Matt fuggin Barkley as our QBs the rest of the year until Tepper probably cursed them TF out to bring Cam back.

While we don't know for certain, Cam said it was Rhule who called him.  My guess is that if Rhule didn't want him at all, then it would have been the GM calling.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Night and day difference in the front office investements.  Since Morgan has been in the FO (5 years)....4 out of 5 first round picks have been offensive players.  The one defensive pick was a corner. Expand it out to the first 2 rounds? 7 out of the 9 picks have been offensive.  That IMO is why our D sucks so bad.   You build defenses up front.   Carolina hasn't been investing there.  Ron's first 5 years? 3 of the 5 first round picks were defensive players.  Expand it all to include second rounders  7 of the 10 picks were defensive.  All front 7 players.     
    • I think he gets this year to show what he can do.  Last year, we had a lot of injuries. This year, we should have some players, even if we lose one or two.  It's the first preseason game.  Some of the starters weren't even in it.  There is no scheming or game planning.  Let's see how guys do when it counts. I think we have a GM that knows a thing or two about defense.  Let it play out.
    • I was ok with the mentor aspect of keeping Dalton, but wow has he fallen off the deep end. The slow behind the WR interception was awful. I keep hearing our WRs created no separation, but on that particular play dude was wide open and Dalton couldn't get it to him with a clean pocket. Next year, we need to address the backup QB spot haaaaaard!
×
×
  • Create New...