Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Steve Smith breaks down Curtis Samuel…


TheBigKat
 Share

Recommended Posts

I was bashed so super hard earlier this year when I made a post about Ron Rivera saying "If he plays, great. If he doesn't play, also great" when discussing his injury during the first game of the season.

This is a dude you paid WAY to much for and its ho hum if he plays? At least say you hope he gets healthy soon and he's a potential big part of your offense and blah blah blah.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, joemac said:

Well we chose Robby over him, so its not like we came out super ahead on things....

Idk man. We will have to wait and see how Robby performs the rest of the year because after last game I’m already convinced that is was almost 100 percent on Sam. I know he had a few games where he had 89 drops but he looks like a different WR now that Sam is out of the picture. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, OneBadCat said:

We made the right choice but I don't hate the player. Curtis is a hell of a player, just can't stay on the field.

He was fuging money on 3rd downs last year. Such a clutch player once we figured out how to use him properly. But yeah injuries have always been a bit of a concern with him and his upside is a bit limited. Glad we let him walk ultimately but would've been nice if we could keep him at a reasonable cap hit too. Washington did overpay especially since Rivera is clueless with him. Packers or Chiefs should have signed him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You guys are just going to have to accept the fact that Dan Morgan is a mid GM best case scenario currently. I used to have people get very belligerent over defending Scott Fitterer too. And that's not hyperbole. People used to go to bat for that guy like he was blood related. We have a truckload invested in the OL and what do we have to show for it? The whole unit is already banged up including one of our big signings. Even without all that the group has largely taken a step back from last year in pass protection. Then you get to the QB room and there's only two conclusions you can make about Dan Morgan. Either he deliberately ignored it two years in a row on his own accord or he took orders from Tepper to do so. Either scenario says he's not fit to be an NFL GM.
    • Frank, ceding control of the defense in no way verifies that Tepper told Canales to bench Young.    It certainly buttresses the idea that Canales would need permission to bench him but that is as far as you can take it.    After that it is pure speculation and it doesn’t make sense. 
    • Uhh, okay yes that happened. I didn’t like the pick either I am a 3rd or later RB guy. Always. Actually hated the CMC pick too. Hated the Stewart pick.  No one wants to talk about trading the #39 in that draft and what he did with that.  Got #52, #155, and the Rams 2025 2nd to boot.   The 52 and 155 plus our 142 5th rounder to go up for a Brooks Everyone wants to forget about the 2025 2nd for that Rams trade  which was used to move up for Scourton.  That Rams trade down was a great deal for us.     
×
×
  • Create New...