Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Worst coaching staff in Panthers history.


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

6 hours ago, NanuqoftheNorth said:

In retrospect, if Dave had to chose which one to fire first, it should have been Hurney.  Rivera should've been given a chance with another GM.  Especially knowing Rivera's best seasons as HC weren't with Marty.

It may not have worked out, but Rivera was never as bad as the clown show we have now.

This is correct.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, mc52beast said:

I guess everyone understands now why the Jets didn’t want Rhule. He wanted to bring his band of college buddies with him and they knew it would be a catastrophe.

Understand this; the circus we call the JETS knew hiring Rhule would backfire.

I thought it was the Giants and we beat them to the punch? Didn't even know the Jets were in the talks at the time. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, RumHam said:

I thought it was the Giants and we beat them to the punch? Didn't even know the Jets were in the talks at the time. 

Jets were interested in Rhule a prior offseason.  

Nothing came of it because Rhule wanted to bring a college staff.  And even the Jets thought that was too bad of an idea 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, NanuqoftheNorth said:

In retrospect, if Dave had to chose which one to fire first, it should have been Hurney.  Rivera should've been given a chance with another GM.  Especially knowing Rivera's best seasons as HC weren't with Marty.

It may not have worked out, but Rivera was never as bad as the clown show we have now.

I liked Rivera outside of his love for Vets over the best player.  Hurney was more of the problem and his love for hidden offensive line gems from Division II teams.

Fitterer and Rivera would be an interesting combo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CRA said:

Jets were interested in Rhule a prior offseason.  

Nothing came of it because Rhule wanted to bring a college staff.  And even the Jets thought that was too bad of an idea 

Eh, it's not that simple.  NYJ wanted to pick the coaches coordinators or have a very strong hand in it...  NY Post reported that Bill Parcells told Rhule not to take a job where he didn't have final say in his OC and DC.  Which makes sense.  Rhule is bad but so are the Jets.  The problem isn't a HC picking their coordinators it's Rhule not being the coach people hoped.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yep. I was hoping for and calling for a day three guy. But I didn’t research the position to say if we should or should‘t have jumped at a particular guy at a particular spot.    And everything I read said it was a poor draft for RBs depth wise. I guess when Seattle takes a backup RB in the 1st, that kind of backs that up.    I definitely think we should keep 4 running backs and if King can play well enough then keep him too.    I believe I heard Canales say we are a running team (talking about drafting a WR he will be needing to block as well as catch). Well if we are gonna be a running team by identity we don’t need to stock the WR room to overflowing. If one room has to sacrifice, it should not be the RB room given our circumstances. 
    • If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
    • I just saw the funniest thing...or very disappointing, depending how you handle misery. A guy on YouTube did a 2027 'way too early' mock draft.  If I told you the simulator has the Panthers selecting in the top 10 , what would you say?  If I told you it was pick #8 and only two QBs were taken in the top 7, what would you say?  If I told you this dude had us taking a defensive player, what would you say?
×
×
  • Create New...