Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

It’s this week or next


Cdparr7
 Share

Recommended Posts

So here we are the final 3 games. The way I see it is if Rhule isn’t terminated this week or next, he will be with us next season. Just doesn’t seem like we wait until the 10th and allow other teams to have their “pick of the litter”.

19-Dec @ Buffalo (loss)

26-Dec VS Tampa (TBD)

2-Jan @ NO (TBD)

9-Jan @ Tampa (TBD)

December 28th is the day that teams can start requesting interviews IF their HC is not employed or informed he will not be here next season.

There are already 2 (JAX, LV) that need HCs and likely a few more seeing their end Monday. (CHI, HOU, Possibly MIN, CLE, NYG)

 

580380B3-03E9-4F0A-AB0E-C93B5BCF546D.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If, as I suspect, we lose out, I just cannot see how you can retain a coach that loses 7 straight and 12 of 14 games to end the season in what is year 2 of said coach installing his culture/regime. So if we do lose these next 2 weeks, I honestly believe Tepper will pull the plug and let a dead man walking interim coach the season ending game. 

Edited by UNCrules2187
  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Camp Fodder said:

No way Cleveland fires their coach. If they are that dumb I would take him

 

3 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Cleveland isn't firing Stefanski.

It's conceivable they might part ways with Baker Mayfield.

Minnesota nor Cleveland will fire their HC.

Chicago, Houston, NYG are pretty solid guesses to go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, PantherKyle said:

Think he gets fired after the year, not after this week.

The problem with waiting until the season ends this year is that with the interview window that the NFL is granting at the end of this season, you give at least two and potentially more teams a head start on interviewing the best candidates.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The aversion to tying up too much money in the ground game when it’s what’s winning us games is crazy to me. I get letting Rico walk if you think he’s easily replaceable but I don’t see many people arguing that, just applying an arbitrary salary cap based on what we think RBs are currently worth. I’d rather be stuck with Hubbard as an overpaid backup (not the worst one to have, mind you) than lose out on the most productive player on the offense personally.
    • Why do people keep saying things like “it’s not Young’s fault we spent so much to draft him”? Who cares if it’s his fault?  Nobody is saying send him to jail or anything.  People aren’t talking about blame for the decision to draft him, they’re talking about how bad he is as a QB and how we’d be much better with even an average QB.  Pointing out that we sunk a lot of resources into drafting him isn’t invalidated because he didn’t make that decision himself. Doesn’t matter whose fault that was, he’s still not playing like a QB who was drafted at all, much less one that cost two firsts, two seconds and a #1 WR. 
    • Might wanna edit your post https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/nfl/2025/01/13/rams-vikings-live-score-updates-nfl-playoffs/77665954007/
×
×
  • Create New...