Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

ESPN suggests 2 QBs for 2022 for the Panthers...

musicman

By musicman,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

onmyown Grand Master

onmyown

Posted
Posted

I don’t understand how you have a coach come in, choose their guy, backpedal and trade more resources for a new guy.

fuging no. You don’t let Rhule destroy future assets he shouldn’t have control over. That’s going to fug the panthers and new staff.

He chose Sam. He needs to continue with sam. Too fuging bad. This is what he wanted. And when he fails next year we can start again whole.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
FuFuLamePoo Mentor

FuFuLamePoo

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Wolfcop said:

If this team does not have another option at QB next year, ticket sales and TV ratings will be horrid. We need a QB that is at least not going to hand it to the other team several times every game. That crap got old real quick. 

Ticket sales will be fine, it’ll just be fans of other teams buying them all up

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ForJimmy Grand Master

ForJimmy

Posted
Posted
13 minutes ago, unicar15 said:

Gimme Jimmy G for a conditional pick with Armstead, best available OL for every pick of the draft, and lean on the D to win. 

Don’t give up anything for injury prone average Jimmy G. If we draft OL this year, we will need our picks to draft a QB next year. Just sign Mitch or Marriotta for cheap and have Cam be our Hill/back up QB for the year. 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
mrcompletely11 Grand Master

mrcompletely11

Posted
Posted
27 minutes ago, Smithers said:

It’s past time for us to draft a QB in round 1.  Keep Cam and/or Sam around as our mediocre QB 1/2 until the rookie is ready.  Address OL through FA and any 2/3 round picks we can accumulate via trades 

We’ve tried to address the oline in free agency.  It doesn’t work and we are stuck with bad contracts.   You have to build the line through the draft.   This isn’t hard.  

  • Pie 2
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
mav1234 Grand Master

mav1234

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, kungfoodude said:

This sounds about right. I expect Rhule to trade the farm for someone or roll with his boy Darnold.

God I hope he just sticks with Darnold.  Can't trust this guy to evaluate anything and we already are on the hook for Sammy D next year regardless.  Maybe if he's dumb enough to believe in Darnold he can stumble into building other parts of the team for our next HC.

The fewer assets we let Rhule deal the better...

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
PNW_PantherMan Grand Master

PNW_PantherMan

Posted
Posted

Giving up any draft resources for a QB like Jimmy G or Love would be awful.  Neither of those guys are good enough to win a championship, so what’s the point?  Jimmy is average and Love hasn’t shown any signs he’s an NFL starter.

Just sign some veteran QB for cheap and keep Cam next year.  Darnold is 18m no matter what, so he may as well be a backup on the roster next season.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
PNW_PantherMan Grand Master

PNW_PantherMan

Posted
Posted

Also I’d just like to add this.

If Green Bay is willing to trade Love for picks, it means he isn’t the answer.  If Love was showing signs he was the next great QB, Rodgers would have been shipped off to the 49ers or Rams this past offseason.

Instead, the Packers are hanging onto Rodgers for as long as he will stay there.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Smithers Grand Master

Smithers

Posted
Posted
52 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

We’ve tried to address the oline in free agency.  It doesn’t work and we are stuck with bad contracts.   You have to build the line through the draft.   This isn’t hard.  

uhhh - did you even read my post?  I clearly said build the OL through FA and the draft. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • MHS831
      Disturbing

      By MHS831 · Posted

      I can say that I have defended Canales because I get that they are doing all they can to keep from looking like idiots for drafting Bryce, from the trade up to signing $150m guards to drafting XL and Brooks etc---nothing seems to work.  And Hiring Canales was part of the Bryce Young rehab program, so so he can't really decide to "move on."  That has to come from Morgan and Tepper. Personally, I think Bryce is due for an injury.  He is small, he is not thick, and he has been a LOT more healthy than most any other QB has who has endured so much pressure.  The thing that bothers me is this---Bryce really does not go through his progressions quickly.  He locks on to his presnap read and stays locked onto him for too long--he seems to fail to anticipate the WR/TE's positioning on the play before the cut--for example, if the WR is running a dig and the CB has his back to the inside of the field, he should be open for a second or less just after the cut.  He seems to wait until the cut has been made before deciding, then checking down quickly while moving in the pocket. OL:  There seems to be a lack of communication--is that on Mays?  Watch this team presnap--they seem a bit confused at times.   I can almost predict the success rate of the play by watching the center and QB before the snap.  
    • KSpan
      Eric Collins Calling First NFL Game (ours)

      By KSpan · Posted

      Anyone else remember back in 2010 when Fox piloted having music under the in-game replays during one of Carolina's games? Not the commercial bumpers but the actual replay clips that the announcers would talk over. Pretty sure it was vs the 49ers. And it was terrible. Point being, Carolina continues being so bad that we get the networks trying things out during their games.
    • PleaseCutStewart
      Disturbing

      By PleaseCutStewart · Posted

      Is it bad I found this video more hilarious than pathetic? I am still laughing at that one play where half the people on the field ran into each other and Bryce still couldn't see Chuba wide open... Also laughing at Cade blocking nobody and somehow losing his cleat Man this offense is a poo show
×
×
  • Create New...