Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Audio: The State of the Panthers (Fox Sports Upstate)


ellis
 Share

Recommended Posts

The problem with keeping Rhule now is actually rather simple to express:

It's very clear that if he happens to be the coach next year, he's on a one year contract.  Given that, what experienced NFL coach worth a cracked nickle is going to sign up for that?  Given that, what free agents with any sort of ambition will come here?

Keeping Matt Rhule at this point is handicapping yourself.  We're bad enough that we don't need extra weight to carry climbing out.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Great great listen.  I love the Luiz interview.

 

I want a reporter to ask the following questions:

-You preach analytics but you gave cmac a record breaking when the data says RB's on their second deals are not worth it, what was your mindset with this deal?

 

-Can you explain the rush to sign the 2 lineman in the first HOUR of free agency?

 

-Can you explain your thought process of giving up so much capital for Sam Darnold when it appears your were clearly bidding against yourself?

 

-Can you explain your thought process in picking up the 5th year option of darnold needlessly?

 

-Can you explain your evaluation of Rashawn Slater and Micah Parsons? 

 

-Can you explain your hesitation in playing BRady Christenson even when your playoff chances were minuscule and the left tackle in front of him was clearly struggling?

 

 

I think those are fair questions that Fit, Rhule and Tepper should answer

  • Pie 4
  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Great great listen.  I love the Luiz interview.

 

I want a reporter to ask the following questions:

-You preach analytics but you gave cmac a record breaking when the data says RB's on their second deals are not worth it, what was your mindset with this deal?

 

-Can you explain the rush to sign the 2 lineman in the first HOUR of free agency?

 

-Can you explain your thought process of giving up so much capital for Sam Darnold when it appears your were clearly bidding against yourself?

 

-Can you explain your thought process in picking up the 5th year option of darnold needlessly?

 

-Can you explain your evaluation of Rashawn Slater and Micah Parsons? 

 

-Can you explain your hesitation in playing BRady Christenson even when your playoff chances were minuscule and the left tackle in front of him was clearly struggling?

 

 

I think those are fair questions that Fit, Rhule and Tepper should answer

Yes. All of this. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, ellis said:

Hey guys. I do an afternoon show down here at Fox Sports Upstate. I spent some time today diagnosing some of the problems with the Panthers, thought I would share my perspective with you. 

Hoping to have Joe Person on tomorrow to dive into his latest article, and some thoughts on Carolina’s future. 

Thanks for letting me share. Hope everybody’s having a good new year!

Direct link: Fox Sports Upstate: John Ellis on the Panthers

That was a good listen!

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

For all the talk about analytics, just about nothing David Tepper's done has indicated an analytical approach.

That started from the beginning with keeping and trusting Marty Hurney, whose record absolutely did not justify it.

There was a lot of talk about sport science, as well. What is the application of this? For a team that continues to see you guys go down, and couple that with the overutilization of McCaffrey, hard to see where it comes in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ellis said:

There was a lot of talk about sport science, as well. What is the application of this? For a team that continues to see you guys go down, and couple that with the overutilization of McCaffrey, hard to see where it comes in.

Mentioned it elsewhere, but the Eagles reportedly invested big in having a sports science department a while back.

A few years later, they realized it wasn't really helping much of anything so they dropped it.

That absolutely strikes me as something David Tepper would do, even though somebody's already done it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Mentioned it elsewhere, but the Eagles reportedly invested big in having a sports science department a while back.

A few years later, they realized it wasn't really helping much of anything so they dropped it.

That absolutely strikes me as something David Tepper would do, even though somebody's already done it.

They can hire me instead.  panthers: MrC - what can we do to extend Cmacs longevity?   Mrc:  How about this stop giving him 30 touches and stop giving him the ball needlessly at the end of blowouts.

 

Pay me

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, ellis said:

Yeah, I don’t get the sense that he’s getting fired on Monday. I think there will be some conditions, including some potential changes on the staff. Outside of that, it’s anybody’s guess. Anything could happen, I suppose. At this point, I think most signs seem to indicate he’ll probably return.

"The house is on fire, let's get some new curtains." Yaaay!

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

And while I'm repeating myself, I'll repeat this too.

When we heard the story of how Matt Rhule got hired, how they went into "recruiting mode" just 90 minutes into the interview and all that bullsh-t, I couldn't help but picture an elderly person intently listening to a fast talking insurance salesman.

That Tepper and Hurney came out of that meeting feeling like they just had to have this guy (so much so that they weren't even going to interview Josh McDaniels) made it sound like 100% emotional, suspend logic, "feel it in my gut" decision making. Hell, Marty pretty much said that when he was describing the process.

And coming from Marty, that's not a surprise. He always trusted his gut, even though more often than not his gut was full of sh-t.

But from the guy who was supposed to be a believer in analytics...well, it showed that when it comes to football, his gut rules his decision making too.

(and it's equally full of sh-t)

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm likely on my way out for a while anyway...as far as being an every game watcher, keeping up with every move the team makes.....but if Rhule is back next season...I'm for sure done.

Not that the team will miss me, but I bet there are a LOT more of me out there.  Money will tighten up this coming year for most of us, the first line item I will cut will be the Panthers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

There definitely are things I hope get done in this hiring cycle, but my big fear is that we're totally going to screw it up.

Unfortunately, Panthers history makes that a pretty reasonable fear.

My biggest concern is that there's not someone between Rhule and Tepper that know how to build a franchise.

Fitterer is a pawn that may or may not be good at his job. Rhule is in charge of everything we he shouldn't be.

Who knows what Tepper is thinking about this mess.  But whatever it is he shouldn't be in charge of the football leadership decisions.  

First and foremost they need someone in there that knows how to run a successful pro football organization. Until that happens expect more of the same.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I gave you a full breakdown and examples from last year as to why I think it's unfair to expect 1k from T-Mac this year if everyone stays healthy. But the TLDR version is we will have 4 legitimately good WRs next year, most rookies who get to 1,000 yards don't have any others on the team with them let alone 3 others, it will be hard for him to put up 1k with out the others being injured or falling short of expectations themselves, but in 2026 without Thielen it's different.
    • Ulcerative Colitis is not CTE. 
    • Last year Thielen had 615 yards in 10 games (had more ypg than his 1k season in 23).  XL had 497 in 16 games with tons of drops and Coker had 478 in 11. They also only had only 192 of our 518 targets to get those numbers. So if Thielen has 1,000 yards again, XL and Coker each improve to say 600 yards each, and T-Mac comes in at 800 yards, you're going to say that's not good enough?  Especially if he ends up with close to, if not getting to, double digit TD's like I think he will, as he's going to be a red zone monster for Bryce? Because if that's the breakdown of just the Top 4 and Bryce plays all 17 games, he's going to be pushing a 4,000 yard season as the TEs, RBs, and other WRs will probably add up to 750-1k yards as well, and I think that would be far more than anyone here could be expecting of him this season. Last year the Giants only had 2 players with more than 331 yards besides Nabers and they were 699 and 573 while Nabers "only" had 1,200 yards (granted in 15 games).  While the Jags second leading receiving was a TE with 411 yards and BTJ also "only" had 1,282 but in all 17 games. If everyone stays healthy and XL/Coker have improved, I think Bryce is going to spread the ball around rather than focus on T-Mac in a way that most of the 1k rookies have been able to get. Again I point to MHJ and the Cardinals last year. They had 3,859 yards receiving.   McBride had 1,146, MHJ had 885, then their 3rd and 4th in rec yards were 548 and 414. Take the 146 and 85 that McBride/MHJ had over my example for our guys and give them to the other two and they get to 7 yards shy of the 600 I'm using for XL/Coker, while the rest of the team added up to 866 yards. So, if you expect T-Mac to get to 1k, where are you taking those yards from? if anything, XL and Coker each getting 600 yards seems like a low projection, so they wouldn't come from there. Maybe they come from Thielen now that we have T-Mac as the true #1.  But I think if anything, having T-Mac draw attention will just make it easier for Thielen to get open and him and Bryce have great chemistry already, he's not going to stop throwing his way if he can pick up easy chunks of yards there. So maybe they come from the RBs, TEs, other WRs, but it's I think a very fair example to show why expecting 1,000 yards if everyone stays healthy isn't necessarily fair to him. It's also why I said I'd then expect at least 1,200 yards in 2026, as once Thielen leave and all 3 of T-Mac/XL/Coker get better, they absorb that 1,000 yards Thielen leaves behind with T-Mac probably taking close to half of it and the other two splitting up the other half.
×
×
  • Create New...