Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

We need New Uniforms


The Huddler
 Share

Recommended Posts

This current "modern" look with what looks like matte colors is an eye sore. 

 

After we lose again next season, get a new coach and get some new fresh uniforms.  

 

I like our old ones but these modernized ones just look bad. with the skinny rings on the shoulder pads and the shineless matte colors

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It would make something worth monitoring this offseason.  First time I would actually think it would be more exciting than the product we're trotting out there and personnel moves we're making. 

Although Tepper has given off very dated corporate vibes circa early 2010s so I think it could likely go very poorly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, The Huddler said:

This current "modern" look with what looks like matte colors is an eye sore. 

 

After we lose again next season, get a new coach and get some new fresh uniforms.  

 

I like our old ones but these modernized ones just look bad. with the skinny rings on the shoulder pads and the shineless matte colors

Dude read the room 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, The Huddler said:

we need to install some of these around the stadium. We will need quite a few or else people will be waiting for ages just like those who want another beer. 

 

FFF92A56-70AA-46B5-A63F-676B790348C5.gif.64bc6be211460c7a8be1643827da429d.gif

"Oh coach, coach check this out...take a picture in this here picture booth..."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Well that's part of where the disconnect is then, you think Chark was a "solid NFL player" I couldn't disagree more, he's someone who had one solid NFL season and then was at best a JAG the rest of his career, I wouldn't call that a "solid NFL player" If he was a #3 WR and put up the stats he did outside of that 1 season, then sure, he's a "solid NFL player" but he put up those numbers as the #1 WR in 3 of his 4 seasons that he had meaningful roles and the #2 in a high powered offense the 4th.   That's not good and not what I'd call a "solid NFL player"
    • Everything always makes sense in hindsight. Hell, I've seen guys who were touted by everyone as slam dunk "safest player in the draft" type prospects bust massively. Remember Aaron Curry? Robert Gallery? I'm just never going to say that a prospect is definitely a better NFL player than a solid NFL player. Better as a prospect? Sure, you can always make those arguments. But ultimately it comes down to what you do on Sundays and what you did on Saturdays just isn't relevant when you're talking about who's the better NFL player.
    • And that's totally fair to say, but I think it also shows you guys are conflating what I'm saying with thinking I'm saying something like, "T-Mac will 100% have a better NFL career than Chark had" which is a completely different statement and one I'd agree, you can't really say about any NFL player before they've ever taken a snap. Because what I'm saying, is that T-Mac's actual ability and skills right now, are at a higher level than Chark's ever were, it's a completely different statement that is independent of what his NFL output will be. Look at it this way, without even knowing what the rest of Chark's career turned out to be, would anyone seriously say they'd take Chark after the 2019 season over today's T-Mac if they somehow were in a draft and we were deciding between the two?  As even after that season, his potential was never what T-Mac's is right now. Even with those other prospects, I'm sure some of them before their NFL career started, still had more ability and physical talent than Chark had, because again, this is so much less about T-Mac and so much more about Chark.  A bad coach, system, QB, injuries, etc, that derail a WR's career no matter how good they may have been and is much more of the reason they were a bust than their own abilities.   Chark was a tall WR with little WR speed, he was a deep ball threat and wasn't even particularly great at it, he was not that good of an actual WR. If the Jags had another above average WR in 2019, then Chark doesn't get his 1k season that I think people are getting too hung up on in thinking he was some great player in this league.
×
×
  • Create New...