Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Ellis Williams-Carolina Panthers must decide what to do with Brady Christensen. The film is telling


ladypanther
 Share

Recommended Posts

Matt Rhule just said hr evaluated an all pro LT as a guard in the NFL. It doesn't matter if BC is a guard or a LT  or the freaking waterboy. Rhule cannot evaluate oline talent.

We've seen it with Erving.

We've seen it with Elfien.

Miller. Jordan. Tecklenberg. 

Not starting Brown. Not starting BC. 

You don't fix the coach you cannot fix the line. It's that freaking simple no matter who you pick. 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I agree. And if Christensen is your LT, I think #6 is down to two choices. QB or auction block. Take a QB or trade down.

He’s saying if it was him BC wouldn’t be the tackle. He’d be an all-pro guard and he’d play next to Ekwonu, Neal, or Moton. 
 

There is only one thing to do with this pick. It’s to take the best OT on the board. The best thing about Ekwonu and Neal is that they can both play G and T and can do both at an elite level. This is literally a best case scenario possibility for landing the 6th pick and getting a player that is elite and that we badly need. 
 

I feel like Darnold is probably beyond repair. But the next QB that comes in could have an elite line if we do this draft right. 

Edited by unicar15
  • Pie 3
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, SmokinwithWilly said:

Matt Rhule just said hr evaluated an all pro LT as a guard in the NFL. It doesn't matter if BC is a guard or a LT  or the freaking waterboy. Rhule cannot evaluate oline talent.

We've seen it with Erving.

We've seen it with Elfien.

Miller. Jordan. Tecklenberg. 

Not starting Brown. Not starting BC. 

You don't fix the coach you cannot fix the line. It's that freaking simple no matter who you pick. 

It’s so simple yet folks around here act like this:

misfits shut up GIF

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Ikem Ekwonu or Evan Neal are there, you draft them to play LT and put Christensen at LG.

If neither of them are on the board, attempt to trade down and take either Tyler Linderbaum, Charles Cross, or a QB.

 

Ellis Williams is quickly becoming my favourite Panthers' beat writer since Jourdan Rodrigue 😮

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, unicar15 said:

He’s saying if it was him BC wouldn’t be the tackle. He’d be an all-pro guard and he’d play next to Ekwonu, Neal, or Moton. 
 

There is only one thing to do with this pick. It’s to take the best OT on the board. The best thing about Ekwonu and Neal is that they can both play G and T and can do both at an elite level. This is literally a best case scenario possibility for landing the 6th pick and getting a player that is elite and that we badly need. 
 

I feel like Darnold is probably beyond repair. But the next QB that comes in could have an elite line if we do this draft right. 

I agree on needing to make the call. I disagree with his call. Christensen has OT quickness. He doesn't have OG raw power. His lack of strength will be a bigger hindrance inside going against DTs than it is outside going against edge rushers.

He has OT skills and quickness with OG build. Skills and quickness are a lot more important than build.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's pretty simple.  Eliminate the doubts. No gambles: Free Agent Top Priorities

Ben Jones at Center

Duane Brown at Left Tackle

2 proven commodities. Armstead isn't coming here. Brown is older but his overall production the last 3 years is better than anything we can field by far. 

If Reddick cant resigned because of these two so be it... Center & LT DONE. No growing pains on the blind side. 

Round 1: Trade back .... Pick after 15-20. We'd swap 1sts, pick up a 2nd and 3rd via value. Select Kenyon Green with the first pick. 

Second Round grab Drake Johnson (Replaces Reddick) ...see above. I think his ceiling is actually higher than Reddick's. 

Brown-Christensen-Jones-Green-Moton

Also, as good as these 5 are as-is, they'll look even better playing next to each other. 

Oline problem solved and instantly becomes a strength... and with 1 trade we'd leave the draft with around 8 picks. At which point Rhule could go BPA crazy if he wants to idc. Just solidify that line. 

I've said that scenario before and will continue. Our solution is easy assuming the players are willing to come here. We have Samir which means I'm not too worried about the cap. So ofcourse I'ma keep touching on it like a blind reader. 

Just don't draft a QB early. That answer is not in this draft. 

Christensen needs to find his spot and STAY in that spot. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Carolina Cajun said:

i would feel alright if it werent a double monkey fuging hucklefug as HC.  Seriously  Christiensen would have started since Erving got injured if he werent licking door knobs in his free time.

Absolutely agreed. We SHOULD have a LOT of game tape on Christensen at LT and Brown at RG. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I agree on needing to make the call. I disagree with his call. Christensen has OT quickness. He doesn't have OG raw power. His lack of strength will be a bigger hindrance inside going against DTs than it is outside going against edge rushers.

He has OT skills and quickness with OG build. Skills and quickness are a lot more important than build.

If we cant sign Brown, Armstead, etc .. that makes things interesting. 

Do you trust Brady at LT enough to pass on Neal? Do you pick Neal and move Brady to LG? Or pick Linderbaum and let Brady develop? Sadly I dont think they have enough game tape of Brady playing LT here to fully come to a solid conclusion either way (and without an attribute bias).

Alot of situations for Rhule & Fitterer... I just have an extreme lack of faith in their Oline evaluation skills (Rhule atleast).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Um, no, just no. Bills, Chiefs, Chargers, Ravens, Bengals, Texans, Eagles, Commanders are 8 teams that it's not even a debate, they aren't trading their QB for Purdy. Patriots, Broncos, Titans, Giants, Bears, Vikings, Falcons are 7 more teams with QBs drafted in the last 2 years that also would rather stick with them than trade for Purdy as they all have more upside than he does. Lions, Packers, Cowboys, Bucs are 4 more that would likely keep their QB's as well, age aside for Goff, Dak, and Baker. Panthers and Colts are two teams in the same situation, QB's who have both struggled and shown flashes to where the teams probably stick with them because they drafted them, but in a re-draft of all QB's, they probably take Purdy over the guy they currently have. Jags, Cardinals, Dolphins, are 3 more with QB's who probably have a higher upside than Purdy but come with their own question marks, so debatable if they'd take Purdy over who they already have. That leaves Jets, Raiders, Steelers, Browns, Saints, Seahawks, and Rams. Rams would take him over Stafford for the future of course, but not for 2025, and I'd think the Seahawks would take him over Darnold, but honestly not sure if they would take him over Milroe at this moment as they really like his potential and have him for 4 years really cheap. That leaves 5 teams that I see who would absolutely take him over their current situation right now, and a handful of others who MIGHT take him over their current guy, a far cry from your 20.  
    • Agreed. Also as soon as they received the top pick in the next draft it was over. Bears won that trade. Gave up a top overall pick got one the next year plus pick 9, a couple 2nds, and DJ Moore a proven young WR. Had their 2024 pick from us be in the late teens or later it would be more debatable IMO. 
    • Option A:  Pay your starting QB starting QB money. Option B:  Look for a starting QB for 4-10 years (or longer) while wasting the talent at every other position.    How many of the top 20 QB's do you think are worth what they are being paid?   When you factor in the last year of his present deal his contract is really an average of 45 million per year which in today's QB market is a very, very good deal. I wish we'd had found a Brock Purdy to pay 50+ million a year right after we parted ways with Cam.  Ya'll go ahead and live in fairy tale land where good to great (much less elite) QB's are available to pay. Just the fact that they had the chance to pay Brock after the disaster of trading up for Lance is a testament that when you find a quarter back you can win with, complete in the playoffs and superbowls with, you pay him.  
×
×
  • Create New...