Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

It’s bad in Carolina, but this should make you smile…


mc52beast
 Share

Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, WUnderhill said:

And having the announcers take their side on top of that. “Of course that’s ridiculous for a game to end like that” like they should just be able to spot their own ball lol.

I thought I was the only one thought the booth was for cawdboys.  I love the way it ended myself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, PantherPhann89 said:

Yeah, every HC with a losing record was  fired every year. Tepper wants to give Rhule another year. I don't agree with it,  but I'm not going to constantly put My Team down!

Good for you!  

FYI:  I'm not putting down my team, I'm calling balls and strikes.  Rhule is a bad coach and should've been gone last Monday.

Ignoring reality, that Matt Rhule is out of his depth as HC, isn't going to make things any better for the Panthers. 

On the contrary, it will only make things worse.

Edited by NanuqoftheNorth
  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, PantherPhann89 said:

To what avail? It serves no purpose. What fans wants to constantly put down their team....

To vent the frustration from having a pyrite tongued coach with a playbook drawn using a half eaten crayon.

We've got nothing else. This is where we are now.

Unless we get the pitchforks out and go take down our fat sweaty dork of a feudal lorde over at Appaloosa and fire Rhule ourselves, whining is all we got!

Edited by Stumpy
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Carl Spackler said:

Shut the hell up and enjoy your 0-17 beatdown

I still wouldn't walk around bashing my team. If day we need a lot of work, we need a better o-line, we need better pay calling,  etc. I would not be tearing my team down from the inside and still call myself a fan. Yes we've got problems that won't be fixed in one season, but there's not a doubt in my mind that Tepper isn't working on it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, WUnderhill said:

And having the announcers take their side on top of that. “Of course that’s ridiculous for a game to end like that” like they should just be able to spot their own ball lol.

Don't think the announcers were taking their side at all.  Romo said "You can't spot your own ball, he should have been looking for the referee".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
    • adamantium? adam? adam thielen super bowl game winning catch ?
    • You're really gonna pass up the opportunity to make a joke about skidmarks in underwear here?  Alright fine.
×
×
  • Create New...