Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Pep Hamilton declines Panthers interview


X-Clown
 Share

Recommended Posts

Read somewhere that one of the stipulations for the new Texans HC is to keep Hamilton on staff as OC.  Idk if it’s true, but Caserio is a micro managing GM.  If he likes Davis Mills or thinks Watson would stay, why the hell would he come here?  Mills improved a lot under his tutelage.  It’s almost like… Matt Rhule doesn’t know what he’s doing 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, jb2288 said:

This is absurd. I've lost almost all respect for Tepper here. Do the right thing and pull the trigger. Go cut Flores a check 

I'm torn on Flores

He's clearly a good coach, he had back to back winning seasons with the Dolphins.

However, he got fired because he couldn't get along with his QB or GM.  That to me is a bit of a red flag, if you have a good thing going and you're willing to get rid of the coach because of those issues, they must have been pretty bad.

Sure, maybe the GM is at fault there, but Too seems like a good guy, I doubt the issues between them were on his end.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, tukafan21 said:

I'm torn on Flores

He's clearly a good coach, he had back to back winning seasons with the Dolphins.

However, he got fired because he couldn't get along with his QB or GM.  That to me is a bit of a red flag, if you have a good thing going and you're willing to get rid of the coach because of those issues, they must have been pretty bad.

Sure, maybe the GM is at fault there, but Too seems like a good guy, I doubt the issues between them were on his end.

He reminds me of Harbaugh in that regard.  Good coach, tough personality to handle.  I’d prefer him over Rhule since we would be competitive at the very least 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Newbie said:

He was the best of the candidates on our list. His work with Davis Mills this season and Justin Herbert last year gave me some hope he could help us mold a QB. 
 

There’s no reason that anyone that’s any good would want this job. Rhule will constantly meddle with your work, blame you for the lack of success and then you lose your job when he’s finally fired. 
 

Everyone can see the problem except David Tepper. 

Yup clean house and you could have Pep as HC and some decent coordinators would sign on, and still have a couple years of cheap rookie contracts while you fix the problem areas on the roster. It's becoming super obvious no one of merit is gonna do a favor for Matt Rhule after his scapegoating and general lack of real time game management 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...