Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Pep Hamilton declines Panthers interview


X-Clown
 Share

Recommended Posts

Read somewhere that one of the stipulations for the new Texans HC is to keep Hamilton on staff as OC.  Idk if it’s true, but Caserio is a micro managing GM.  If he likes Davis Mills or thinks Watson would stay, why the hell would he come here?  Mills improved a lot under his tutelage.  It’s almost like… Matt Rhule doesn’t know what he’s doing 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, jb2288 said:

This is absurd. I've lost almost all respect for Tepper here. Do the right thing and pull the trigger. Go cut Flores a check 

I'm torn on Flores

He's clearly a good coach, he had back to back winning seasons with the Dolphins.

However, he got fired because he couldn't get along with his QB or GM.  That to me is a bit of a red flag, if you have a good thing going and you're willing to get rid of the coach because of those issues, they must have been pretty bad.

Sure, maybe the GM is at fault there, but Too seems like a good guy, I doubt the issues between them were on his end.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, tukafan21 said:

I'm torn on Flores

He's clearly a good coach, he had back to back winning seasons with the Dolphins.

However, he got fired because he couldn't get along with his QB or GM.  That to me is a bit of a red flag, if you have a good thing going and you're willing to get rid of the coach because of those issues, they must have been pretty bad.

Sure, maybe the GM is at fault there, but Too seems like a good guy, I doubt the issues between them were on his end.

He reminds me of Harbaugh in that regard.  Good coach, tough personality to handle.  I’d prefer him over Rhule since we would be competitive at the very least 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Newbie said:

He was the best of the candidates on our list. His work with Davis Mills this season and Justin Herbert last year gave me some hope he could help us mold a QB. 
 

There’s no reason that anyone that’s any good would want this job. Rhule will constantly meddle with your work, blame you for the lack of success and then you lose your job when he’s finally fired. 
 

Everyone can see the problem except David Tepper. 

Yup clean house and you could have Pep as HC and some decent coordinators would sign on, and still have a couple years of cheap rookie contracts while you fix the problem areas on the roster. It's becoming super obvious no one of merit is gonna do a favor for Matt Rhule after his scapegoating and general lack of real time game management 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You could say that-- but if we don't need a starting OT this year, why would you draft a flawed one that is not going to play? (We are coming from different underlying assumptions and perspectives--I see your argument and don't disagree with the premise) Your thinking is based on the assumption that an OT for the future is more important than immediate needs at other positions, or that we can meet other needs in later rounds even if we take the OT in round 1.  I do not think there is but 1 OT worthy of a first-round grade---they are mocked based on need and demand--if we do not have a need for a starter right now, a team at 18 may grab a T that is the 33rd best player--worth it if you have no starting T, but not if you have a starter.  So just because they are mocked around the middle of the first it does not mean that the players are good values--teams get desperate.  QBs are a great example.  Simpson may be worth it in round 1 for the Cardinals, but not the Jets, because they have Geno Smith.  Sure, they will need a QB by next year, but taking Simpson is a reach. I do not see our need, with 2 starters (Walker and Moton) and another possibly returning by the end of the season enough to justify ranking OT over positions like Safety, Will LB--I do not think we replaced A Shawn Robinson (We gonna put a NT out there?  Wharton (280lbs)?  So do we reach in round 1 for a player who may not play much or do we get a Will LB that can cover?  A deep free safety?  A quality center? A playmaking TE?  A DT to replace Robinson?  A wide receiver to balance the secondary?  Long term, if the right player was there, you would be right.  Short term, OT is a luxury at this point, in my view.  
    • Put Huey P Newton on the helmet. With his AK. 
    • We arent switching. Evero is 3-4 to the core. Given how 3-4 has been a noticeable characteristic of top defenses recently and we have drafted and signed players fir it  I dont know why anyone would think that's a good idea 
×
×
  • Create New...