Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Being completely objective here, McAdoo was the best available Candidate for the Job


Ricky Spanish
 Share

Recommended Posts

15 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Of the candidates we had, I probably would have taken Gruden.

McAdoo had the most connections of anyone though. He's previously worked with Sean Ryan, Tony Sparano Jr and Kevin Gilbride, plus there's the Tom Coughlin connection.

How good will he be? Honestly not real sure right now. I do know working with Eli Manning is a little different than working with our quarterback room.

Everyone seems to be focused on his time at the Giants but he spent a good bit of time with the Packers.

From what I can tell he was on the Packers staff from 2006 to 2013.  

He definitely has "NFL" experience and has been around some very successful organizations. 

All of that might not mean anything in the long run but at least he is the opposite of what we had.  

Big question for me is how much latitude he is given with the offensive staff, especially the offensive line.

 

 

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, WOW!! said:

No he was definitely overrated and not having experience as a play caller at any level cost us..

No, he failed because our offensive line was constantly blown up not because he wasn't a good OC.

If you can block up plays, they'll work, if not, they won't. It's that simple.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well they best listen to this guy when it comes to picking a QB:

 

Ben McAdoo had Josh Allen and Lamar Jackson as the top 2 QBs in 2018. He also wanted the Giants to draft Patrick Mahomes in 2017. I'd be curious to see his opinion on the 2022 QB class.

 

We also heard he didn't like Darnold and there was another one that escapes me he had as a good QB...maybe this is the method to the madness. Use homie to get a QB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Dory said:

No, he failed because our offensive line was constantly blown up not because he wasn't a good OC.

If you can block up plays, they'll work, if not, they won't. It's that simple.

Coming up with plays and knowing situational football are two different things. Doesn't matter how good the plays are if you use the wrong play at the wrong time...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Dory said:

We already had the hot name OC in Brady and it failed because our offensive line was constantly blown up not because he wasn't a good OC

OC's are overrated, if you can block up plays, they'll work, if not, they won't. It's that simple.

It is obviously true the OL and QB didn’t help Brady but his ego (which wasn’t deserved at all) is why he was canned.  That plus he didn’t know situational football in this league 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, Dory said:

No, he failed because our offensive line was constantly blown up not because he wasn't a good OC.

If you can block up plays, they'll work, if not, they won't. It's that simple.

That's one reason .. But he also failed because he had no audible to that situation or could game plan past that situation..

Joe Burrow got sacked and pressure way more this year.. And Zac Taylor still game planned beyond having a bad Oline and made half time adjustments. Which gave him a competent offense. Something Brady hasn't done yet.. Ppl need to stop making excuses for Brady.. He was inexperienced and was never a play caller at any level of football.. And He failed trying to do it at the top level of football...

We need to accept the fact we got fooled by the media about a coach who wasn't ready and a OC who wasn't nearly ready to run a NFL team...

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Panthercougar68 said:

The report that McAdoo wanted Mahomes in 2017 and the Giants front office said no is kinda believable. 
 

Ben the OC needs to be separated from Ben the HC. If he brings Pat Flarhety with him as a line coach I’ll have a little more faith in the staff next year. 

Ben was the OC play caller the majority of the time he was the HC in NY.    And his teams really stunk on O once the league got accustomed to Beckham Jr.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, OldhamA said:

Giants Offense Rankings:

-2013: 28th in Points and Yards (before McAdoo)

-2014: 13th in Points and 10th in Yards (McAdoo)

-2015: 6th in Points and 8th in Yards (McAdoo)

2016 - 26th in points 

2017 - 31st in points 

his teams got worse.  He was the play caller on those horrible ones too.   And his teams always sucked at running the ball…..which goes against the Rhule narrative that he is the key to a physical running team emerging. 

his teams lobbed it for Odell and that got figured out.  Then he got fired. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Fox007 said:

Well they best listen to this guy when it comes to picking a QB:

 

Ben McAdoo had Josh Allen and Lamar Jackson as the top 2 QBs in 2018. He also wanted the Giants to draft Patrick Mahomes in 2017. I'd be curious to see his opinion on the 2022 QB class.

 

We also heard he didn't like Darnold and there was another one that escapes me he had as a good QB...maybe this is the method to the madness. Use homie to get a QB.

It was Rosen that he liked too. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CRA said:

2016 - 26th in points 

2017 - 31st in points 

his teams got worse.  He was the play caller on those horrible ones too.   And his teams always sucked at running the ball…..which goes against the Rhule narrative that he is the key to a physical running team emerging. 

his teams lobbed it for Odell and that got figured out.  Then he got fired. 

 

But we’re gonna ignore 11-5 and playoffs on 2016?

The giants defense couldn’t stop anyone when he was a head coach and the revolving door of coaches that game afterwards showed that maybe there might be something to the giants themselves and not McAdoo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You kinda gloss over this, but this is really at the crux of this whole argument....which Flacco are we talking here?  You bring up that he played with 3 different teams but ignore the fact that his performance varied quite a bit from team to team. 2024 Colts: 65.3% completion, 12 TDs, 7 INTs, 220.1 YPG, 7.1 Y/A, 90.5 rating 2025 Browns: 58.1% completion, 2 TDs, 6 INTs, 203.8 YPG, 5.1 Y/A, 60.3 rating 2025 Bengals: 63.4% completion, 12 TDs, 3 INTs, 290.6 YPG, 6.8 Y/A, 96.2 rating 2025 Flacco (Browns + Bengals): 61.1% completion, 14 TDs, 9 INTs, 252.0 YPG, 6.1 Y/A, 80.8 rating vs. 2025 Bryce: 62.7% completion, 14 TDs, 7 INTs, 196.2 YPG, 6.2 Y/A, 86.0 rating I bolded the comparison that I think objectively makes the most sense...just simply comparing the two QBs for the entire season.  Otherwise you'd be cherry-picking Flacco's time with the Bengals and ignoring his earlier stint with the Browns, which sounds an awful lot like people cherry-picking Bryce's stats in the second half of last season. So again, which Flacco?  Basically the only thing consistent with Flacco across each of these teams was his W/L records: 2-4, 1-3, and 1-4 respectively.  I'd say if we're comparing each version of him to Bryce this year: Colts Flacco > 2025 Bryce, Browns Flacco <<< 2025 Bryce, Bengals Flacco >> 2025 Bryce, and 2025 Flacco < 2025 Bryce - Flacco this year only beats out Bryce on YPG but in part because he throws significantly more passes (almost 60 YPG more than Bryce, despite a lower Y/A which is pretty telling) .  Flacco is maybe the most apt case study about how important a QB's circumstances are to his success.  He was easily a bottom 3 QB in Cleveland and arguably top 10-15 in Cincinnati...and we're talking about the same player from the same season.  All that happened was taking him from one team and plopping him onto another team; nothing inherently changed about him as a QB.  Funny enough I think that's all that one dude on here was trying to say when he made that long poorly-received post after having an epiphany working for PFF behind the scenes or w/e.  That it's largely short-sighted to just try to evaluate QBs in a vacuum when there are so many variables at play that ultimately decide whether a QB is successful or not.   I think Bryce has been mediocre at best this season and I'm ready to move on regardless of how he ends this season - I'm highly skeptical a strong end to the season will carry over into next year considering how last year ended and this year began.  I would certainly agree that he's a bottom-third QB this year.  I just don't understand you scoffing indignantly at anyone holding the opinion that Bryce has had a better season than Flacco...I can only assume it's recency bias.  Or maybe you know the stats don't support you, which is why you're conjuring up the god-forsaken arbitrary "eyeball test" which is the kinda thing people in here were saying about Fields for years, pinky promising that he really truly was a franchise QB despite his awful stats.  Perhaps it's called the eyeball test because I roll my eyes anytime I hear someone bring it up seriously as an argument.
    • CMC said he expected to play his career here.  He didn't think he would be traded.  Carolina decided they wanted to trade him.  He picked here he wanted to go.   But we dumped him.  For largely peanuts.   But we dumped DJ Moore and he never had a blood and guts game.   So it's never a guarantee. 
    • I have many people telling me CMC was blindsided and heartbroken by the trade, but that's not how I remember everything going down.  49ers are pretty wounded right now on defense so if our offense can sustain drives and score, that'd be the difference maker. Their offense? I'm not scared of CMC. 
×
×
  • Create New...