Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Being completely objective here, McAdoo was the best available Candidate for the Job


Ricky Spanish
 Share

Recommended Posts

12 minutes ago, AU-panther said:

From 2006-2013 he was either the TE or QB coach for GB.  I realize he didn't call plays and they had a pretty good QB but their PPG ranking those years were, 23,4,11,3,9,2,6,7.  At least he has been around good offenses.  I'm trying to be positive here.

His first two years as an OC, in 2014 and 2015 their rankings were 11 and 13.

Granted he struggled as a HC but for the most part he has always been on staff for some really good offenses.

 

 

Giants were (i think) ranked 28 * before Ben took over, so that is one huge leap forward. Like you Im trying to find the pros, the cons are plenty tho... let all the whiners do that...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rhule says he wants an OC with NFL play calling experience.  He is widely criticized for the lack of NFL experience and nepotism involved in picking his staff. 

Here is a sentence from David Newton's press release to SI.  See if you can spot the "SMH" phrase in this statement:

"Rhule talked to eight or nine candidates, some from the college ranks, before settling on McAdoo."

 

Edited by MHS831
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Basbear said:

Giants were (i think) ranked 28 * before Ben took over, so that is one huge leap forward. Like you Im trying to find the pros, the cons are plenty tho... let all the whiners do that...

Same.

Fact is his resume was as good or better than most guys we could have chose from.

 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, MHS831 said:

Rhule says he wants an OC with NFL play calling experience.  He is widely criticized for the lack of NFL experience and nepotism involved in picking his staff. 

Here is a sentence from David Newton's press release to SI.  See if you can spot the "SMH" phrase in this statement:

"Rhule talked to eight or nine candidates, some from the college ranks, before settling on McAdoo."

 

Im firmly in the belief one David Newton has been trolling panthers fans for nearly 2 years. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Snake said:

I understand you're trying to polish a turd but it's still a turd. 

Yes of all the two people who would actually join a lame duck situation we got the best one of those whippeeee

Its the Panthers remember if McAdoo had any hope anywhere else that's where he'd been have been. Went from consultant to OC ofc someone would take that. We only have people who were banished to the shadow realms as candidates...Gruden lol.

1 minute ago, FugginPoo said:

Is he in good terms with Aaron Rodgers?

Used to be in good terms at least.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Sgt Schultz said:

Why would this be any different than any other topic?  This is the Huddle, remember? 

Let's not get delusional with our expectations.

You're right..

But it was getting to the point where ppl are posting stats of teams he didn't even coach..lol

I thought I could help..

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Of the candidates we had, I probably would have taken Gruden.

McAdoo had the most connections of anyone though. He's previously worked with Sean Ryan, Tony Sparano Jr and Kevin Gilbride, plus there's the Tom Coughlin connection.

How good will he be? Honestly not real sure right now. I do know working with Eli Manning is a little different than working with our quarterback room.

Edited by Mr. Scot
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So he liked Josh Allen and Patrick Mahomes, I wonder how he feels about this class? I’m not too concerned about him as an OC, Rhule has too much roster control to even tell if he is going to be good or not. He wouldn’t active Brown (when he was healthy) and let his terrible vets play Guard/Center instead all year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It is simple if you focus only on OT.  But there is the cap, talent levels that differ from year to year, and team needs that fluctuate, as you know.  While I would be happy with an OT and understand it, I am not sold on OT as the answer. I agree that the game is won or lost in the trenches, but I do not think over-drafting with the first round pick is the only way of addressing it--especially if it may be a year before you know what you have or reap the rewards.  We both agree that you have to stay ahead of it.  Just because you take a T in round 1 does not mean that you have met the need. Teams need qbs too, but drafting them too early in round one is usually disastrous A few weeks ago, I was high on Freeling.  I still am (cautiously), but there are reasons to approach some of these tackles with a "Buyer Beware" approach.  Again, I am not against drafting an OT in round 1, but not if that OT has a late first or second-round grade.  That is not good value.  On top of that, put him in the garage for a year?  Take Freeling, for example.  Some project him to Cleveland at 6.  Really?  He is a fringe first rounder, IMO.  IF you want to give away draft capital to get a non-starter, that is how GMs get fired. First, we can address Freeling’s seemingly massive improvement in pass protection. He did earn an outstanding 86.1 PFF pass-blocking grade in 2025, which ranked seventh among qualified FBS tackles. That was an improvement over his 65.3 mark in 2024. Georgia’s passing game was heavily built on play action and screens, which allowed Freeling to partake in just 95 true pass sets all season. That ranked just barely among the top 200 tackles in the country.   Freeling earned a solid 75.4 PFF pass-blocking grade on those true pass set reps, but that pales in comparison to top tackles in the class, such as Francis Mauigoa and Spencer Fano. Mauigoa earned his 85.8 true PFF pass-blocking grade, second best in the nation, across 212 such reps, more than twice as many as Freeling.   What about Freeling's run blocking?  61.3--which is slightly above all tackles in the country.  So if you draft Freeling in round 1, you are getting a guy whose numbers were padded by play action and screens--but in pure passing sets and in run blocking, he was average when compared to every tackle in the country. Elite?  Buyer beware. Lomu?  Athletic, Can struggle in the run game and against power rushers.  Late first rounder-early second, imo.  Arms less than 34", which could scare some teams. Proctor?  Can play high and the weight could be a problem he fights.  Personally, I see him as the best option for an immediate starter but his ceiling is lower.   I realize all players have areas of concern, but I think you will see some of these OTs drop on draft day, with good reason.   Fano?  32 inch arms may kick him inside to G. You will respond that all OTs have question marks, and they do--but not researching the situation is not the answer.  Freeling is a stud athlete, and despite the stats, I like him, but not as depth at 19.  Proctor?  I get it if you needed your starter now, and speed rushers give him fits.  To adjust, his angle to block a 9 tech is nearly 90 degrees when it needs to be closer to 45 degrees.  That decreases the pocket, and a short QB can't have that.     
    • Stupid to say golden maye and Lloyd weren't coming just because you said but we're North Carolina? To be fair I don't think anyone would jump ship just to come to Duke either. 
    • Jaelan Phillips, Devin Lloyd and the rest of the Carolina Panthers’ new recruits will begin work at Bank of America Stadium on April 20.   The first phase of the offseason program will launch later this month, the team announced Friday. Organized team activities (OTAs) will begin on May 26, with six workouts spread out through June 4. Those workouts are considered voluntary. Mandatory minicamp will run June 9 to June 11.   Read more at: https://www.charlotteobserver.com/sports/nfl/carolina-panthers/article315275598.html#storylink=cpy
×
×
  • Create New...