Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Albert Breer on the Panthers quarterback options


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

41 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Big splash vet, 1st round QB, or stick with Darnold should be the only three options. Enough with these third tier vet acquisitions. We've sank enough resources into them and the results are going to keep being the same. 

What is the cut off for "big splash vet"?  Cousins? Carr?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am going to hope most of the options he mentioned aren’t taken.  Kenny Pickett would be a disaster and not better than Darnold.  If we build the OL and left QB for later I would like that much better than a Pickett or other QB reach.  Sadly, I would put us reaching for a QB at like 90% probability atp.

Fitty and Rhule better do some serious evaluations before taking any of these QBs at 6.  

I like Sam Howell personally but even then I would want him in a trade down scenario.  

Willis…same.  Trade down first.  This QB group is really suspect overall.  You shouldn’t just pick the best suspect talent and call him the savior.

Edited by Shocker
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, hepcat said:

I think they’ll either try to get a mid tier vet FA QB or stick with Darnold. I don’t see them drafting Pickett. If they passed on Fields and Jones, why would they pick Pickett? He’s a lesser prospect than either of those guys. 

I disagree. I like Pickett a lot and no doubt in my mind he has better arm talent than Fields, who I dont like at all or Jones, who had a good year at NE. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Shocker said:

I am going to hope most of the options he mentioned aren’t taken.  Kenny Pickett would be a disaster and not better than Darnold.  If we build the OL and left QB for later I would like that much better than a Pickett or other QB reach.  Sadly, I would put us reaching for a QB at like 90% probability atp.

Fitty and Rhule better do some serious evaluations before taking any of these QBs at 6.  

I like Sam Howell personally but even then I would want him in a trade down scenario.  

Willis…same.  Trade down first.  This QB group is really suspect overall.  You shouldn’t just pick the best suspect talent and call him the savior.

If we trade down how do we know the team trading to our spot isnt getting a qb? That would be insanity to trade back with that plan and then all of the talent is gone

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, hepcat said:

I think they’ll either try to get a mid tier vet FA QB or stick with Darnold. I don’t see them drafting Pickett. If they passed on Fields and Jones, why would they pick Pickett? He’s a lesser prospect than either of those guys. 

Because he's desperate for his job and Tepper doesn't understand or care.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

If we trade down how do we know the team trading to our spot isnt getting a qb? That would be insanity to trade back with that plan and then all of the talent is gone

Naw…when I say trade down it would not be very far.  Target OL and QB.  Take what the board gives you.  One of these QBs will definitely be there mid first round.  

I know where you are going here though.  If they pinpoint a QB he will go at 6.  They won’t risk it IMO.

Edited by Shocker
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Gronk is the best TE of all time, but he also played with Brady. Clarke was great, but had Peyton and in an era TE's didn't make crazy money. Kittle is great, but the two times he's made the SB, he was still on his rookie contract for one, and the other the 49ers had Purdy on a cheap rookie deal which help them build the rest of the roster. So again, it's not about not wanting an elite TE, of course it would be nice.  But realistically, in today's NFL, unless that elite TE with a top end TE salary is on a team with a GOAT level QB and/or other serious cap savings (i.e. key players on rookie deals), then I think it's not a good use of cap space.  
    • This place was the poo pre tepper with tons of hilarious posters like phillyB. Joined in the 2000s during the 07 season and have been here bitching about this team since. but yeah its sadly been dying a slow death, every time I come to this site I am surprised its still up. I think the 2015 season was the absolute peak, the Panthers and this board especially just haven't "felt" the same since then. Igo should really sell the board since he clearly doesn't care anymore. Also, Reddit blows and the Bryce defenders on there need Jesus.
    • Guessing the price is too rich here given the injury history.  2024 was brutal and production dropped off in 2025 with a few more injuries (albeit rough qb play).    Don’t really understand the narrative that Young can’t benefit from talented upgrades on offense. Especially here with respect to a tight end. Any QB will benefit from talented receivers that threaten the top of coverage and tight ends with skills to stress zone.    The age and injury history, coupled with what he’s likely asking, just probably means we can better spend that money elsewhere.
×
×
  • Create New...