Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Washington Commanders lol


CRA
 Share

Recommended Posts

23 hours ago, PhillyB said:

literally the most uncharismatic, vague, unmarketable, weird ass name they possibly could've picked

Agreed. I could have maybe got used to it if it was something like "The Washington Commando's" but Commanders is just.....bad. I just picture a commander being a person shouting orders and not really doing anything as opposed to the Commando actually taking action and fighting. Neither would be my first pick but even just that simple difference is big.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Shocker said:

I like the new name. Jerseys and logo are tight too

 

12921F44-57B9-4066-AD3E-9A7AD4FB97E4.jpeg

The uniforms are dope the name is trash. No way it stands at this rate. Too much backlash.

Admirals, Sentinels, The Warriors, all would have been 100x better.

Edited by OneBadCat
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/2/2022 at 6:20 AM, PandaMan said:

I don’t think Dan Snyder is capable of much critical thinking.  The name Commanders isn’t catchy, and it doesn’t even have a good abbreviation/nickname like you said.  Commies is literally the only thing lol.  Aside from Cummanders 

Yes but at least in Europe WC is an abbreviation for toilette 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Posts

    • The worst most dangerous drivers always seem to be the ones who think they are the best drivers
    • Leaving Smitty off of there is a crime
    • The intro to the article talked about how they picked the teams and it wasn't just on overall career, it was a factor, but their peak ability also factored in. He 100% should be on a roster like this, because it was building the best roster from players since 2000, not the best careers during that time. And no matter how you slice it, CMC's peak ability if he could have had a long healthy career would have made him one of the best RBs of all time.  He had back to back seasons with over 1k rushing and 100 catches, with the 2nd of them also having over 1k receiving, that's wild. He's also still only 29 and I think is going to end up playing at least another 5-6 years as he's going to slowly shift into being a slot WR at some point I believe and basically become what Deebo was for the 49ers for a while.
×
×
  • Create New...