Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Albert Breer on 2022 QB Class


BurnNChinn
 Share

Recommended Posts

30 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

We've consistently made the dumbest possible QB decisions and consistently overvalued former Matt Rhule college recruits since Rhule was hired. Pickett at #6 is so on brand for Rhule's Panthers that it feels inevitable.

 

 

I hate this, but I can 100% see it happening. 

I was in the Fields camp last year, hoped he fell to #8 and we took a f****** corner because ''we believe in Sam'' guaranteed him 18.8M BEFORE EVER PLAYING A SNAP. 

Now we'll get the Kenny's a 3 or 4 year starter bs, and he's ''athletic'' for the position. Blah, blah. 

My stance for this off-season was trade back from #6, swap with that team and secure a future first as a part of the trade, and some day 2 compensation this year. 

At this point, ride it out with Darnold, sign Cam, let them battle in camp, and use FA / the draft to solidify the roster. Then with our 1st, and the additional 1st from trading this year's #6 look to move up if needed to select a QB in 23'.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, stbugs said:

Why? Strong didn’t look like a good QB against draftable talent. Why weaken your OL by trading down and picking a QB who isn’t going to be a successful NFL starter?

I think he is inferring trade down with Washington and still get a great Olineman and get Strong in the 2nd. Strong still has the physical traits where he could be something after a season or two in an NFL program. 1 quarter behind an awful offensive line doesn't make a player.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, thunderraiden said:

I think he is inferring trade down with Washington and still get a great Olineman and get Strong in the 2nd. Strong still has the physical traits where he could be something after a season or two in an NFL program. 1 quarter behind an awful offensive line doesn't make a player.

I don’t see those physical traits. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, ECHornet said:

I hear the scouts and huddlers, but give me Sam Howell over Zach Wilson and Trey Lance. 

Trey Lance is a great athlete who sat for a year at SF, soaking up what an NFL QB needs to know.

Zach Wilson has a rocket arm and the charisma to lead an NFL team.  I don't know if that will happen in NY because they are such a dysfunctional franchise.  But Wilson is a player.  

I can't see Howell being anywhere near either of those two. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mr. Scot said:

Is Matt Rhule still in charge?

Yep. Doesn't matter what anyone else sees, Rhule sees what he wants to see and thinks everyone else is missing it.

Pickett will be the pick. He likes him... probably more accurately, the idea of him, and thats enough for him.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, thunderraiden said:

I think he is inferring trade down with Washington and still get a great Olineman and get Strong in the 2nd. Strong still has the physical traits where he could be something after a season or two in an NFL program. 1 quarter behind an awful offensive line doesn't make a player.

If we want to improve this offense both OL and playmakers, we should capitalize on this WR class as much as the OL. A trade down scenario netting us something like Linderbaum+Olave is where I’m starting to lean. 

The QBs just look like career backups and rather erratic. They’ve officially deflated any optimism. Corral still has some due to SB omission. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, Panthera onca said:

What do you see in Sam that makes you think he will be a better pro than Wilson or Lance?

I think Sam has better arm talent than both. I believe Sam has a stronger arm than Wilson and every bit as accurate. I like Wilson’s ability to navigate in the pocket and keep his eyes downfield better. 
 

I think Sam will be more accurate than Lance. 
 

I also think Sam will be a threat in short yardage situations with his legs. He’s built similar to a fullback. My main concern is his feet and did the terrible talent around him last year teach him some bad habits with progressions. 

Edited by ECHornet
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • A team should always be putting at least one or two draft picks in at tackle and guard each season. Those guys just don't last nearly long enough and those that do get very, very expensive. In our situation, we need a little more time to see what the Icky injury works itself out to. Njiman performed really well out there and if this injury lingers into the next season, then he might do well enough there to hold the line for the team. Or we could draft early if there is a stud LOT in the draft when our spot comes along.  Honestly, we may be looking at replacing both LT and RT this season at this point. Moton is getting long in the tooth and while he deserves a shot to go for a playoff run with this team, I don't know whether we will really see him come back next season yet. It's still so darned early in all of this to say.
    • Because we had a ton of things go our way this year and made the playoffs with a -70 point differential.  This year was the outlier.  Regression to the mean is unavoidable.  So the team will have to significantly improve to beat 8 wins next year.
    • One thing I noticed in this game (and I say this as the biggest of Bryce Young haters) is that Bryce did do a solid job of throwing into voids in this game, and leading receivers on crossers.  There were a few times where I was thinking "where the hell is he throwing it" only for a receiver to appear out of nowhere and catch it in stride.  Mike McDaniel might be a guy that can squeeze a little bit of production out of the otherwise ghastly Bryce Young. His offenses heavily feature that style of passing game.  I've heard Idzik is drawing interest from other teams.  If so, bringing McDaniel in at OC would be a stellar move.  I know it'll never happen, but fun to think about. 
×
×
  • Create New...