Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Joe Brady to the Saints? Speculation about OC


ladypanther
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, The Huddler said:

those players made joe brady 

 

 

Yeah pretty sure those guys were like "We got it coach". This is from an observer fluff piece, he basically never ran a full offense until learning on the job with us. 

While Brady did not call all of the plays at LSU, he was responsible for talking to Burrow after drives from the booth to go over what to improve. He was not responsible for calling all of the plays, but he would call red zone, third down and other packages

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, The Huddler said:

while rhule sucks, so does brady

 

dude rode the coat tails of Burrow, Chase, and Jefferson. 

Using this as a source is like quoting a huddler or using wikipedia to write a paper. pretty dumb imo

No, it's not the same. USA Today is a well-regarded national publication. It's a legit operation owned by one of the largest media companies in the world. Just saying.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, top dawg said:

No, it's not the same. USA Today is a well-regarded national publication. It's a legit operation owned by one of the largest media companies in the world. Just saying.

Dude the article is an opinion piece from a saints fan… it’s not a national publication written by a national columnist.

 

these sub sites are just fan run op-eds  on the USA Today platform. Like a blog. 
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The entire OP is about the play calling and results and only mentioned T-Mac one time, in the sense of our offensive struggles only made me more frustrated about our #1 WR only getting a single 2nd half target in a game we were behind for the majority of it. How is that showing my true colors? It's way more of other people reading too much into it and thinking this is all and only about T-Mac for me, but it's not.  He just happens to be the player that I specifically was upset by his 2nd half usage, but it had nothing to do with my personal feelings towards him, but that he's our only legitimate WR and he had a single target in the 2nd half after going for 73 yards in the first. To me, that is a very legitimate play calling gripe, the win or particular player aside.
    • Dowdle looked great. Watching him made this game alot of fun.  
    • We’re stuck with Bryce for now.  He led TWO drives where we came from behind to take the lead. One of them was the winning drive and he threw the winning TD. Taken as a whole…he played at expectation after the 1st quarter. That’s not so bad under the circumstances.  We got the win. Maybe they’ll struggle to build on it but a win is a win. He drove the offense down and took the lead when it was needed. You can’t take that away from him.    We’re not changing QBs anytime soon.  Or owners.  So…when they win, we should take it at face value and give credit where it’s due.  Bryce came up big in clutch moments. You can’t take that away from him.
×
×
  • Create New...