Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

If you have a heart you root for the Bengals, if you have a brain you bet on the Rams....


TheBigKat
 Share

Recommended Posts

I want the Bengals to win, it epitomizes the theory that you can be a franchise QB away from winning it all. They are fun, they remind me of the 2003 Panthers in the sense they came out of no where. Joe Burrow did America a favor and kept Jackson Mahomes and Brittany Lynn OUT of the Super Bowl. 

 

but at -4, this is one of the easiest SB bets of all time. The Rams are at home (kinda I guess) but that D-line is going to make it miserable for Cincy. We all know what a wreak havoc D-line can do to a SB, it happened in 2015, happened last year, happened for the Giants, etc. Yes Burrow has been sacked a lot, but he and Cincy have not faced a pass rush like this all year. To make matters worse, the Rams offense isn't a dud, they can SCORE and score often. Cincy's defense isn't terrible but it won't impose their will on a game, they are more of an opportunistic defense lead by a star in Jessie Bates and breakout FA in Hendrickson.

 

I love the Bengals story but a big stack of greenbacks says LAR 34 Cincy 17

  • Pie 4
  • Beer 1
  • Poo 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

The Rams don't have a home. That stadium gets overrun by opposing fans nearly every week and that's with them fielding a SB caliber team. Imagine what it's going to look like in down years. There's a reason why the NFL left LA, they just forgot.

 

 

The Super Bowl really isn’t a home field advantage for any team as every game for the past 20 years is basically the Corporate America Bowl

  • Pie 4
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This Matchup reminds me of the Finals last year. Like the Bucks, a team like the Rams have been building towards a title for years and the Bengals have came out of nowhere with a young core like the Suns. I do see flashes of the 03 Panthers in Cincy as well. Oddly enough, this the first super bowl in years where I won't be bummed at either team taking it all. Solid Analysis OP.

Edited by NeederNodder
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Judging by the coverage so far on NFL Network (who has a permanent studio on the Rams campus), I am going to assume that even if the Bengals show up strong, they will not get the calls from the refs to win the game.  The biggest "tell" the refs give off on how they are going to call the game is a timely defensive holding or illegal contact on 3rd down to give the Rams a 1st down.  As soon as you see that, it should be more than a yellow flag.  It should be a red flag for anyone watching the game.

Personally I am okay with either team winning the game.  The storylines in this one are so plentiful that the media has barely needed to touch the Sean McVay vs old assistant coach Zac Taylor angle.  In normal years that would have been front and center.  With this Super Bowl, it has been a side note.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stafford put up with poo for years I won’t be mad if they win, but I do like underdogs and the bengals have also been poo for years

slight edge to wanting to see the bengals win but honestly it doesn’t matter…it’s not all that interesting but it is nice not to have see more same ol mahomes or Brady

meanwhile Rhule is strategizing trading up for Pickett

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'd hold on to Walker - we have no OT depth at all. Freeling is a block of clay - all the tools are there and he appears to have a great attitude. He needs serious work on his technique to realise his potential though.
    • From my watch last night: They weren't trading out of 19 unless it was a daft offer once Freeling got there. They were clearly antsy to get Hunter - and Minnesota actually called to offer the trade down. They weren't trading out of the third round pick once Brazzell fell to it (and Canales would have been happy with him in the second round). They traded back a lot on Day 3 - even if Morgan 'Babe Ruth'd' it with Lee, Hecht and Wheatley; they clearly weren't the only guys they would have taken at those picks. I'm curious to know which player caused the reaction at the start of day 2 (Dan Morgan): "of course they'd pick him"
    • Watching this confirms that this staff and front office is super high on Monroe Freeling. I wouldn't be surprised if he's gotta a real chance to win the starting LT job in camp. If he does, we can look to flip Rasheed Walker to a contender desperate for tackle help.   As for Ickey I still really like him and wanna extend him but based on how the staff was talking about Freeling it might be time for ickey to start taking some practice sets at guard if he wants to stay here as we are gonna have to have figure out a solution for the contracts of Lewis and Hunt.  My preferred scenario for the Oline in 2027 is Freeling-Ickey-Hech-Lewis-Moton. 
×
×
  • Create New...