Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Maybe I was wrong about KENNY PICKETT after reading these evaluations.


Panthers Rhule
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, SizzleBuzz said:

I will take the other side of your trade...

In terms of actual talent level it's not even close. Darnold >>>>> Pickett all day long. All things being equal I'd take Pickett over Darnold too but not if it means spending the #6 overall pick. fug that. I'd rather take another fuging CB than drafting Kenny "Baby Hands" Pickett.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Shocker said:

This is actually very true as amazing as it seems.  I will laugh out loud whichever team picks him…including us

He's the kinda guy I woulda taken in the 3rd/4th last year and he'd be a decent backup QB for 4 years. Like slightly better than Will Grier

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, unicar15 said:

He should have been the best player in the league.

He was.  

ACC POY.  

ACC Offensive POY.

ACC 1st Team.

NCAA All-America Team.

Johnny Unitas Golden Arm Award.

1 hour ago, unicar15 said:

He sat out for 4 years before becoming good.

Complete horse 🐴 hockey.

KP started 49 games over 5-years and went 33-16 which is amazing for Pitt!

Burrow never started until his 4th year and overall started 21 fewer games than Big KP.

In no way suggesting Big KP will succeed like Burrow but your "sat out for 4 years" is 100% a false narrative and you should knock off phony talk pal 🤦‍♂️

 

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ForJimmy said:

Interesting stat comparisons. I think his biggest negative is he only had one good season in his 4 as a starter. I kind of prefer Willis because of his upside, or a trade down and get Howell but I’m definitely not against Kenny. 

To be fair, so did Burrow

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pickett's interviews at the Combine were good, which means a lot in the evaluation process.  That's not too much of a surprise since he's the oldest and most experienced prospect there.  

He's got decent physical skills.  Confidence.  Seems to have the maturity to be a leader in the clubhouse. But his upside appears to be more limited than others.  

Maybe worth a late first round pick.  Almost surely not worth #6.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Immaculate said:

Herbert was a talented QB with a strong arm. His problem coming out of college was that he is introvert and not a good leader. Kenny Pickett isn’t Herbert. If you want a QB that has the best chance to be a franchise QB, it’s Malik Willis. I’ll always go with the guy with the arm talent. 

And he threw to one of the worst receiving corps in FBS

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Could ppl stop being disingenuous when trying to prop up Kenny Pickett 1 × please??

Don't just post 1 season of numbers when he played 5.. 

When comparing him to other QBS compare more then 1 season..

Try to effectively show a progression from year 1 to year 5 not just showing Year 5 and based his whole college career on it...

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
    • adamantium? adam? adam thielen super bowl game winning catch ?
×
×
  • Create New...