Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Watson Thread - Part Deux


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, suntick2021 said:

Ugh

Deshaun Watson is also meeting with the #Niners, per league source.  I’m told the #Saints remain the front runners, based on trade assets and their desire to acquire the 26-year-old superstar QB. Decision likely by tomorrow.

 

49ers meeting has already been debunked which makes the rest of his post meaningless

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Everyone thinks that Watson holds all the power here, he don't.  The radio guy down in Houston just said that Nick Caserio would absolutely sit Watson again, he isn't going to take 50 cent on the dollar.  Watson just might want to go to ATL, doesn't matter, Houston wants either picks or young defensive players, young  defensive players on rookie contracts to be exact. ATL can't offer them that so Watson can "want" to go there all he wants to but Houston still has to accept the deal.  Same thing with NO but not as bad as ATL.  Cleveland has talent but can they put a package together Houston will accept?  Deshawn does have final say when it comes to where he plays, unless he just isn't playing at all.  Texans have the ultimate final say in this and listening to what I just heard, it doesn't sound like the aren't afraid to pay a man 35 million to sit on the bench, they just did it.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, suntick2021 said:

Ugh

Deshaun Watson is also meeting with the #Niners, per league source.  I’m told the #Saints remain the front runners, based on trade assets and their desire to acquire the 26-year-old superstar QB. Decision likely by tomorrow.

 

9ers reporter said that was BS. They don't have a first round pick until 2024. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Doc Holiday said:

To those melting down after every twitter post:

1. Nobody with any actual insight has said anything. 

2. it’s the off-season where everyone lies.

3. Nothing has happened till it happens. We are in the Watson race until he is traded.

4. Houston has a say in where he gets traded too. 
 

5. even if we don’t get him it’s not the end of the world. Just means our draft pick which would be a QB is that much more important now.

 

Him going to a divisional rival is a big deal. Brady, while coming back, is bound to retire for good very soon. The division moving forward as it stands is void of any franchise QBs with longevity. Watsons secures a unique opportunity and advantage over our divisional peers. It’s that important. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On Kyle Bailey right now they're talking about Atlanta's chances and they're pretty much in agreement with what we are saying here.  1. It would look REAAAAALLLY bad for Atlanta to restructure the best QB they've ever had and then a week later send him to Houston.  2. They have an atrocious defense with no people to trade to Houston.  3.  They have hardly any cap space.  55 million dollar dead cap hit.  55 million dollars.  The consensus seems to be that its a huge bluff, and Atlanta has a gigantic uphill battle on multiple fronts if they truly want Watson.  Seem to think that this is a bluff to drive up the price for us and the Saints.  

 

They also just said to keep an eye on Terron Armstead coming to Carolina if we do land Watson.  We could have a great o line all of a sudden.  If there is a God out there PLEASE LET THIS HAPPEN!  

Edited by joemac
  • Pie 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Doc Holiday said:

To those melting down after every twitter post:

1. Nobody with any actual insight has said anything. 

2. it’s the off-season where everyone lies.

3. Nothing has happened till it happens. We are in the Watson race until he is traded.

4. Houston has a say in where he gets traded too. 
 

5. even if we don’t get him it’s not the end of the world. Just means our draft pick which would be a QB is that much more important now.

 

Don't come in here with logic. People are trying to leap from ledges.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, RJK said:

Even if he settles for Carolina, how long until he forces his way out like he did in Houston? A track record of not honoring contracts and tepper wants to give this kid the keys to the franchise 

Unless Tepper goes back on his word and freezes him out, like Cal McNair did, then I dont think it’ll be an issue.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Chiefzack said:

We need to get out of this, if HE is calling other teams, you don't give 2 of your young core players and 3 1sts for someone calling teams himself

This is Houston pumping fakenews to reporters in an attempt to drive up the price.  Dont believe the hype.  

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don't think Dave touches the defense. That might be a mark against him but definitely a huge red flag for evero. He refuses to run anything other than soft zone and when you don't get pressure that's an awful scheme
    • You don't have to convince me. I think not picking up the option should absolutely be firmly on the table but I just do not see Tepper and Morgan doing that for previously stated reasons. Therefore I'm not going to bother entertaining the notion. Just hoping we actually get real viable competition. If that doesn't happen at the minimum then my perception of that is complete and utter professional malpractice.
    • It was absolutely a catch, and I can’t believe how many folks were stating, before the NFL’s apology, that the overturn was the right call.  The ultimate question in this case is this: can a player complete a catch with only one hand? Of course, we all know the answer to that question, and it is an emphatic “Yes.” T-Mac maintained complete control with one hand (believe it was the right) while the other came off when the ball hit the ground. The ball was in the same position in the one hand (watch T-Mac’s fingers in relation to the NFL shield on the ball) after touching the ground as it was when it first went to the ground. Going back to the question above, if one hand can establish control, then there was no need for the other to stay on the ball, so long as the ball doesn’t move in that one hand that stays on it   It blew my mind that they overturned this in the first place. This should not be a “We got it wrong on the replay because there wasn’t clear and convincing evidence.” This should have been, “That was absolutely a catch.”
×
×
  • Create New...