Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Watson Thread - Part Deux


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

17 minutes ago, AggieLean said:

Dudes just want clout. If they get it right, they can be seen as someone who broke it first. If not, no one will care. Getting sick of this clout era we live in 

It also has to do with the NOW NOW NOW world we live in. Jesus, just wait for one or two of THE trustworthy guys to break it or wait for ESPN to break it. Twitter has made people want to have info 27/7/365. #okboomer

  • Beer 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Chiefzack said:

Can we lock this thread now? Garry Cobb has ended any need for it. I'm on my way to the store to get some celebration drinks!

Cobb is a former NFL LB and a current analyst for a fox station. I dont see any reason he should jeopardize his credibility. 

The guy is 64, I think whoever told him this he really trusts, whether it is true or not. 

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Brooklyn 3.0 said:

It also has to do with the NOW NOW NOW world we live in. Jesus, just wait for one or two of THE trustworthy guys to break it or wait for ESPN to break it. Twitter has made people want to have info 27/7/365. #okboomer

Garry Cobb broke it, we did wait

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, PootieNunu said:

Cobb is a former NFL LB and a current analyst for a fox station. I dont see any reason he should jeopardize his credibility. 

The guy is 64, I think whoever told him this he really trusts, whether it is true or not. 

#allinonCobb

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, AggieLean said:

Dudes just want clout. If they get it right, they can be seen as someone who broke it first. If not, no one will care. Getting sick of this clout era we live in 

and the media takes notice---our news is fully aware that people will believe what they want to hear and attack opposing viewpoints.  They can spin almost anything.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That's neither on Ickey nor Bryce, that's a coverage sack. There were plenty of examples where he drifted into pressure or didn't move in the right direction, but on this play we sent two men out deep and Max Protected with both TEs and the RB staying back to block. Both receivers were completely covered down the field with zero checkdown options and the pass rush got home. Bryce took a deep drop back due to the PA and to let the receivers get deeper. That was the play design This sack isn't "Clearly on the QB". There were plenty of examples where Bryce drifts in the pocket or bailed toward pressure last season (open up a random clip from the Jags game for examples), but this is not one of them. Blame Frank and his dumbass playcalling/design for sending two slow receivers who don't get open well on deep routes with no other options on this one.
    • Some things look horrible but you had the position covered. Some things look horrible because they really were.
    • Well this one is more like it, 28-3 Falcons in the 3rd before I just stopped.  Sorry.  Bryce lovers: watch the Chicago game not this one. Bet the farm on Bryce.
×
×
  • Create New...