Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bills were interested in CMC


Panthercougar68
 Share

Recommended Posts

Don't quote me on this but I feel like I remember reading the bills offered their 3rd and Beasley during the combine. Thats when the reports we wanted a 1st + player came from.

Also worth noting the media in NY are under the impression Saquon is only garnering interest for a conditional 5th that could turn into a 4th. 

Pretty far fall from grace.

Edited by SteveSmithTD89
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, @bonafidebanter said:

That tweet said that the Panthers don't want to move him. But, weren't the Panthers actively shopping him? 

It was reported before we were taking calls, never actively shopping him. Which makes sense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, SteveSmithTD89 said:

Don't quote me on this but I feel like I remember reading the bills offered their 3rd and Beasley during the combine. Thats when the reports we wanted a 1st + player came from.

Also worth noting the media in NY are under the impression Saquon is only garnering interest for a conditional 5th that could turn into a 4th. 

Pretty far fall from grace.

RBs just don't hold their value, especially given their durability issues.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, SteveSmithTD89 said:

Don't quote me on this but I feel like I remember reading the bills offered their 3rd and Beasley during the combine. Thats when the reports we wanted a 1st + player came from.

Also worth noting the media in NY are under the impression Saquon is only garnering interest for a conditional 5th that could turn into a 4th. 

Pretty far fall from grace.

Yeah I remember WFNZ saying something about an offer of a 3, 5, and Beasley. 🤢

Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, SteveSmithTD89 said:

Don't quote me on this but I feel like I remember reading the bills offered their 3rd and Beasley during the combine. Thats when the reports we wanted a 1st + player came from.

Also worth noting the media in NY are under the impression Saquon is only garnering interest for a conditional 5th that could turn into a 4th. 

Pretty far fall from grace.

I would have flown to charlotte and openly taken a dump on the steps of BOA and burned every piece of panthers I have if we would have traded cmc for Beasley and a 4th. Hell to the No

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SteveSmithTD89 said:

Don't quote me on this but I feel like I remember reading the bills offered their 3rd and Beasley during the combine. Thats when the reports we wanted a 1st + player came from.

Also worth noting the media in NY are under the impression Saquon is only garnering interest for a conditional 5th that could turn into a 4th. 

Pretty far fall from grace.

Hence why I said that CMC will never garner a 1st. Only teams like us view RB's as being very valuable.

They aren't.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SteveSmithTD89 said:

Don't quote me on this but I feel like I remember reading the bills offered their 3rd and Beasley during the combine. Thats when the reports we wanted a 1st + player came from.

Also worth noting the media in NY are under the impression Saquon is only garnering interest for a conditional 5th that could turn into a 4th. 

Pretty far fall from grace.

Not that far really... he was a one year wonder and hurt ever since. CMC has been healthier than him and that is saying a lot. 

Saquan was over hyped and RBs do not have high value.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Sweet jebus this is idiotic Yes, overall team success in this league, you need a good QB, but beyond just that painfully obvious fact, let's get into the rest of the stupid in there......... First things first, you say.. "if we need a good QB for him to have success, then why are you drafting that player with the #1 pick" Show me one time I've ever said we would need a good QB for T-Mac himself to have success... you can't, because I never have.  I think you're referring to the "he's bad enough that we then have a Top 5 pick to target a QB" part of my post, which is very clearly talking about said QB, not T-Mac.  The other way to interpret that is just overall team success, which again, wouldn't be anything about T-Mac or his ability to impact the offense or overall team wins and losses. I'm quite sure I could do this with a number of teams over the years, but I don't want to spend the time to do multiple, so I'll keep it to just the 2023 Vikings right now since you wanted to use Jefferson as your example....... The Vikings went 3-6 after Cousins went down last year.  And two of those wins came before Jefferson even came back from his own injury, they were 1-4 in the final 5 weeks after Jefferson came back. In those 5 games, Jefferson had 31 catches, 503 yards, and 2 TDs Having the WR you specifically called out didn't help them go better than 1-4 with a bad QB, even though he still put up a great stat line for that time period either.  It also didn't make that QB good enough to where they then went out and brought in TWO new QB's this year to replace Doubs and Mullens who started down the stretch for them last year. And that's with 4th year Jefferson, not a rookie that T-Mac would be If you expect a WR getting drafted #1 overall to be the player to turn a franchise as bad as we are around in 1 season, make whatever QB we're able to put in there be successful, and lead us to a solid season, then you are literally insane. We are AWFUL, we have a few young guys who could turn into great players, but we are so far from being a good team, that there isn't any player we could draft next year that is going to change that in 2025.
    • They might be ass but it’s the professional level like NFL!! I will take a win no matter what!! Still not over
    • So you are just going by what these analysts are saying. So if come draft time they say Ward/Sanders is worth pick 1 you should be good. The future draft QB class is always going to be projected as the next great thing until these young players start playing the game and scouts can see some flaws. Think of all of the high school phenoms that didn’t look as good in college.  If Manning does turn out to be the next great prospect only one team gets to draft him. Odds are someone else could get the top pick, especially if go all in on building a supporting roster. I’m never going to be a just wait another year guy, because there are so many variables. If our staff loves Ward/Sanders then we should just draft them with our pick. It’s as simple as that. I also might go with Hunter over TMac as WR1 in this class.  The roster has the OL to help a young QB, young weapons in Coker, XL, and JT to grow with a QB, and a RB who can catch in Brooks as a safety net for a young QB. Sign a vet WR, extend BC and our offense would be set outside of depth. Let our young offensive core go through their growing pains while we iron out the defense. It’s definitely a path forward.
×
×
  • Create New...