Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bills were interested in CMC


Panthercougar68
 Share

Recommended Posts

Don't quote me on this but I feel like I remember reading the bills offered their 3rd and Beasley during the combine. Thats when the reports we wanted a 1st + player came from.

Also worth noting the media in NY are under the impression Saquon is only garnering interest for a conditional 5th that could turn into a 4th. 

Pretty far fall from grace.

Edited by SteveSmithTD89
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, @bonafidebanter said:

That tweet said that the Panthers don't want to move him. But, weren't the Panthers actively shopping him? 

It was reported before we were taking calls, never actively shopping him. Which makes sense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, SteveSmithTD89 said:

Don't quote me on this but I feel like I remember reading the bills offered their 3rd and Beasley during the combine. Thats when the reports we wanted a 1st + player came from.

Also worth noting the media in NY are under the impression Saquon is only garnering interest for a conditional 5th that could turn into a 4th. 

Pretty far fall from grace.

RBs just don't hold their value, especially given their durability issues.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, SteveSmithTD89 said:

Don't quote me on this but I feel like I remember reading the bills offered their 3rd and Beasley during the combine. Thats when the reports we wanted a 1st + player came from.

Also worth noting the media in NY are under the impression Saquon is only garnering interest for a conditional 5th that could turn into a 4th. 

Pretty far fall from grace.

Yeah I remember WFNZ saying something about an offer of a 3, 5, and Beasley. 🤢

Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, SteveSmithTD89 said:

Don't quote me on this but I feel like I remember reading the bills offered their 3rd and Beasley during the combine. Thats when the reports we wanted a 1st + player came from.

Also worth noting the media in NY are under the impression Saquon is only garnering interest for a conditional 5th that could turn into a 4th. 

Pretty far fall from grace.

I would have flown to charlotte and openly taken a dump on the steps of BOA and burned every piece of panthers I have if we would have traded cmc for Beasley and a 4th. Hell to the No

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SteveSmithTD89 said:

Don't quote me on this but I feel like I remember reading the bills offered their 3rd and Beasley during the combine. Thats when the reports we wanted a 1st + player came from.

Also worth noting the media in NY are under the impression Saquon is only garnering interest for a conditional 5th that could turn into a 4th. 

Pretty far fall from grace.

Hence why I said that CMC will never garner a 1st. Only teams like us view RB's as being very valuable.

They aren't.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SteveSmithTD89 said:

Don't quote me on this but I feel like I remember reading the bills offered their 3rd and Beasley during the combine. Thats when the reports we wanted a 1st + player came from.

Also worth noting the media in NY are under the impression Saquon is only garnering interest for a conditional 5th that could turn into a 4th. 

Pretty far fall from grace.

Not that far really... he was a one year wonder and hurt ever since. CMC has been healthier than him and that is saying a lot. 

Saquan was over hyped and RBs do not have high value.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The good news is that we are pretty uniquely well established to address all of our needs this season. We have $14m real cap space, and something like $40m in trade deadline cap space. Not sure exactly how that works out. But, we have the room to absorb any bad contracts. With recent rule changes regarding retention, that went into effect this season, we now have a huge advantage in the trade market.  On top of that, while we do have obvious needs, we also have a glut of talent in certain areas that we struggle to find ice time for. We are over-stocked on scrappy talented lil-guys, strong defensively sound 3rd liners and shutdown left shot dmen. Whether it's a package or separate deals, idk. But, one of each from Stank/Blake/Nads, Erob/Carrier/KK/Jank, and Walker/Nystrom; throw in some 1st round picks (and frankly any other prospects they want) and we should be able to come out with a 1b to pair with Bussi and either a 2c with size or a 2c and size.   TL/DR We got the money, you got the stuff?
    • I don’t  think 6’4 was ever considered small or undersized. Baby hands tho, yes that was his thing That’s an interesting idea, like an optical illusion? Sounds like you have personal experience with this! 
    • in the 25' draft the Carolina Panthers had hired Brandt Tillis someone who actually understood how to build a successful team & build through the draft .  this team was yes mismanaged for years prior to Brandt Tillis joining the team in 25' & rarely done anything right in the draft outside occaionaly getting lucky on an UDFA such as Jalen Coker who's dad coincidentally happened to be a huge Carolina Panthers fan, hint hint  ...just saying 
×
×
  • Create New...