Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Per sources, the #Panthers have had conversations with Cam Newton regarding a return


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

Cam absolutely deserves a shot to prove he can still play. He came of his couch last year to play behind a JV offensive line and work with two trash OC's and was still our most exciting offensive player. Give him a full offseason and see what he can do. You can then trade down or take a LT at 6 and continue to build the team. If it doesn't work out then rhule is fired and fitter and a new coach can draft one next year in a better class. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I wouldn't rank is above Seattle or Indy.

Is it really gonna be a farewell tour though, or are we gonna see one or two good performances followed by three or four that leave everybody saying "yeah, he's done"?

I mean, they probably envisioned last year as a redemption story of some sort but it didn't really work out that way.

Rhule would bench him after he throws his second interception.  Rinse and repeat between Cam and Sam. It will get ugly. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, w280sax said:

Honestly, I think if we can get a stud lt in the draft, I'd be OK with this.  It would be awesome to see cam at his best again surrounded with a solid line and weapons.

I still feel like cam could dominate again if everything went right.

We need a viable backup in about any route we can take now.

Hahaha no. Cam is toast. Can’t pass, runs slow. Move on people. 

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, TheSpecialJuan said:

Rashad from Panther Nation Podcast had inside info that told him we offered Cam a contract but he turned it down 

Did they say he actually turned it down, or just set it aside to return to later? Can't remember but I'm assuming he's not in a rush with all the crazy QB poo going on in the league

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Basbear said:

How on earth? they post totally different..

 

 

58 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

As others have said, for whatever you think of them individually, those two are nothing alike.

 

25 minutes ago, BurnNChinn said:

Damn man

I think y’all came in at the around the same time and though y’all post different takes y’all post spammy at times. I dunno. I just seriously lump you two as the same poster. Like, my brain just reads your two very different screen names as the same. 

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No you dont.  He had all those records for years before his final season. Whether career or season he had them all years before his final season in which he played 6 games.
    • Williams covered for Moore by saying they were on the wrong page about Moores specific route. Williams could have easily covered for him by saying he messed up. Suggesting only 1 route was ever intended to be a viable target is absurd.
    • I am going to agree with Linville this time--I think we need to get a veteran edge (We have Jones II, Scourton, and Princely--2 developmental guys and a decent veteran).  We don't really think of Jones because he had a hamstring injury weeks 3 and 4 and a back that required surgery Week 6-17.  He still managed 10 pressures, and he will be 28.  Princely Umanmielen only played in approximately 18-20% of the snaps and he struggled at times.  Basically, he was a situational pass rusher.  He got 1.5 sacks and 10 pressures.  He should improve, but for now, he is what he is.  Scourton gives us hope.  For a rookie (and thanks to Jones II's injuries, he was given more PT), he had 8 sacks--and held the edge.  He played at a first-round draft pick level.  He has the potential to become "that guy" in 2026. We lose Wonnum, who played nearly 700 snaps and amassed 3 whole sacks.  For a person raised a Gamecock, I would not be upset if we purged our roster of all South Carolina alumni.   However, I see it this way:  Wonnum was decent holding the edge, something Patrick Jones II and Scourton have demonstrated at a high level.  He is a liability, if you ask me.    Jones had 7 sacks one season in Minnesota and is known for his inside rushing ability--not what you would call a speed rusher.  I think Princely was a bit disappointing, but he was a bit raw.  Out of college, they described him as being a bit predictable.  I see no reason he will not improve in 2026 and become a situational pass rusher.   Basically, with Scourton and Princely expected to continue to develop and Jones II returning from injury, I think we need another veteran (if we can get a good one) to give us balance and depth.  A third developmental player is not ideal.   Draft:  OT, LB, WR, OL depth, S. Free Agency:  Edge, possibly a WR;  re-sign Mays, Cuhran, BC (??), and Nijman.  Let walk:  Wonnum, Scott, Dowdle.  I see about $20m per year after signing the OL depth.  Spend it on a veteran edge.   Players like Reddick (Tampa), Bosa (Buffalo), Khalil Mack (LAC) could be available on a one or two year deal in the $15m range.  We could splurge here, but I think a veteran situational pass rusher (depending on Jones II's back) is all we need while our 2 young guns develop.    
×
×
  • Create New...