Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Apparently the Browns wanted this for Baker.


Recommended Posts

17 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Baker is much more fixable than Darnold.

Although that isn't really saying a lot.

Fixable!?? Lol.. I am not sure about that!! He seams to be set in his ways.. that’s why teams aren’t touching him.. We have to go best player available!! Which I think we will if we can’t trade back.. smokescreens!! We get a qb in trade back.. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Browns will need a QB while Whip-It-Out's never-ending legal problems continue to limp along...

...hell, they may as well keep Baker on the roster because the way things are going Mr. W.I.O. could very well miss another entire season 🤦‍♂️

Has there been any confirmation of a formally-executed/legally-binding contract between the Team and Whip It Out?

Interesting that W.I.O. left an organization with 7-winning records and 6-playoff appearances in last 11-seasons...

...for some bumblers with 1-winning record and 1-playoff appearance in the same 11-seasons😬.

Assuming he does get to play again, how long before he starts acting out when things don't go his way?

Edited by SizzleBuzz
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, SizzleBuzz said:

Browns will need a QB while Whip-It-Out's never-ending legal problems continue to limp along...

...hell, they may as well keep Baker on the roster because the way things are going Mr. W.I.O. could very well miss another entire season 🤦‍♂️

Has there been any confirmation of a formally-executed/legally-binding contract between the Team and Whip It Out?

Interesting that W.I.O. left an organization with 7-winning records and 6-playoff appearances in last 11-seasons...

...for some bumblers with 1-winning record and 1-playoff appearance in the same 11-seasons😬.

Assuming he does get to play again, how long before he starts acting out when things don't go his way?

Dude, you gotta give it up or seek help one.

  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • And that makes you right. 
    • Mel Kiper said he would retire if Jimmy Clausen wasn't a successful NFL starter too. Just because the experts make a claim doesnt mean it's true either.  Bryce may be a serviceable QB for someone. Serviceable QBs don't bring you a perennial winner or lead you to the playoffs over and over. Serviceable QBs also dont get 50m plus per year deals which is what a Bryce extension would look like.  The stats show he hasn't been even a serviceable QB in the 3 years he's been here. The eye test shows he hasn't put together 2 franchise QB salary games back to back in 3 years.  Complain all you want about people being negative, but people pointing out that Bryce is held to a different standard than anyone else on the team isn't complaining. It's stating the obvious. 
    • We have big bodied WRs and 3 TEs who all have potential and each bring something different to the table. I never saw the need to go out there and try and find a new starting TE.  While it's nice to have a guy like McBride, Bowers, etc, I think a team's better use of the cap is by having TEs on rookie contracts or cheap vets, not having to pay elite TE money.
×
×
  • Create New...