Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Apparently the Browns wanted this for Baker.


Recommended Posts

17 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Baker is much more fixable than Darnold.

Although that isn't really saying a lot.

Fixable!?? Lol.. I am not sure about that!! He seams to be set in his ways.. that’s why teams aren’t touching him.. We have to go best player available!! Which I think we will if we can’t trade back.. smokescreens!! We get a qb in trade back.. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Browns will need a QB while Whip-It-Out's never-ending legal problems continue to limp along...

...hell, they may as well keep Baker on the roster because the way things are going Mr. W.I.O. could very well miss another entire season 🤦‍♂️

Has there been any confirmation of a formally-executed/legally-binding contract between the Team and Whip It Out?

Interesting that W.I.O. left an organization with 7-winning records and 6-playoff appearances in last 11-seasons...

...for some bumblers with 1-winning record and 1-playoff appearance in the same 11-seasons😬.

Assuming he does get to play again, how long before he starts acting out when things don't go his way?

Edited by SizzleBuzz
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, SizzleBuzz said:

Browns will need a QB while Whip-It-Out's never-ending legal problems continue to limp along...

...hell, they may as well keep Baker on the roster because the way things are going Mr. W.I.O. could very well miss another entire season 🤦‍♂️

Has there been any confirmation of a formally-executed/legally-binding contract between the Team and Whip It Out?

Interesting that W.I.O. left an organization with 7-winning records and 6-playoff appearances in last 11-seasons...

...for some bumblers with 1-winning record and 1-playoff appearance in the same 11-seasons😬.

Assuming he does get to play again, how long before he starts acting out when things don't go his way?

Dude, you gotta give it up or seek help one.

  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He can’t even learn to run routes. No chance in hell he can do both that and pick up blocking schemes 
    • Well he had essentially a 70% completion rate for almost three thousand yards.  Biggest issues were awkward and inconsistent release.  I wouldn't call arm strength bad, but not great.    
    • I see him being better and most of that is a few downfield passes that were seemingly non existent.    But it is what is around him that has dictated the trajectory more than the quarterbacking. He is game manager level and unable to dictate to defenses.  And even if I am wrong and he is the reason we ‘upwarded’, we are bumping our heads on the ceiling and only making meager gains. If it is an incline it is awfully shallow degree wise. Like a finance graph that tracks your progress and hovers around the rate of inflation. Barely breaking even.  Is that where you want your money?  We make up these deadlines expectations and generally he does the minimum of what he needs to do to hang around.    It does not encourage me to believe that when we get into a game against a good run d that we cannot break down with our run game, to believe that we can pivot to the air and successfully counter their strategy.  But they run it back again. Of course I am gunshy of a repeat of the same thing we have watched for three years.    oh, and yes his durability is his most impressive positive for my money. I fear the other shoe dropping on that and the contractual consequences that will follow.   Last  of all, too late to edit my mistake here but would like to acknowledge it: the last three years has done very little to convince me that I was not wrong in not wanting him. One too many “not”s. 
×
×
  • Create New...