Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rockhill site going south fast it seems.


Big Sexy
 Share

Recommended Posts

12 hours ago, electro's horse said:

170 million is around 1% of his net worth. to put that into consideration, tons of people on this board are probably spending 15-20% of their net worth annually on an oversized truck they have no need for (that was purchased because they're insecure and decided to buy a personality) and would HAPPILY walk away from if they could. 

sunk cost is a thing too

Yes, its is only 1% but you know how rich people are with money, losing $100 is a big deal. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

😂

The one that I quoted.

i must have missed it in this thread, its 25 pages long... so pardon my oversight. 

I am just curious if you had an example of Tepper being petty. It would be interesting to read about how he is perceived as a petty person. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

i must have missed it in this thread, its 25 pages long... so pardon my oversight. 

I am just curious if you had an example of Tepper being petty. It would be interesting to read about how he is perceived as a petty person. 

https://www.townandcountrymag.com/society/money-and-power/news/a3777/david-tepper-sagaponack-house/

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Meh, I think this all gets worked out.  I think Tepp went into this deal knowing this was going to happen.  I mean, who the hell thought RH could pony up $225m in the first place?  It's Rock Hill!!  Tepper is bluffing and he's sending a message to CLT to get ready and bend over.  Yeah, he could pull the plug and have some financial losses, but his and the team's image will take more of a hit than his pocket book if they do move on from RH, even though it's not their fault RH couldn't pay in the first place.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, TheCasillas said:

I am just curious if you had an example of Tepper being petty. It would be interesting to read about how he is perceived as a petty person. 

“billionaire” = “petty”

It’s a mutually inclusive condition, I’m surprised you didn’t know this 🤦‍♂️🤣.

Just so you know, billionaires also aren’t allowed to hold the other side to their contractual obligations during the execution of a business deal…

…if said deal gets sideways due to lack of performance by the other side — the billionaire is expected to simply keep moving forward and fund the other side’s obligations too.

These are only 2 of at least a dozen immutable laws/conditions codified in The Official Billionaire’s Behaviorsaurus as published by The Huddle Society of Billionaire Haters…

…carry on 👋👍

Edited by SizzleBuzz
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Jon Snow said:

The news station in Spartanburg SC reported this morning that things have been worked out and construction is a go for the site.  Who knows who caved but I suspect it was SC officials. 

Probably the SC Governor meeting with Tepper yesterday. The state of SC is probably going to kick in to the project to get it done. That's my guess.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Jon Snow said:

The news station in Spartanburg SC reported this morning that things have been worked out and construction is a go for the site.  Who knows who caved but I suspect it was SC officials. 

..so this 25 page thread will drop down the page and the Huddle will march forth finding a new topic to bitch about😅

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Jon Snow said:

The news station in Spartanburg SC reported this morning that things have been worked out and construction is a go for the site.  Who knows who caved but I suspect it was SC officials. 

What changed from this report yesterday? https://www.wistv.com/2022/04/12/lets-get-moving-gov-mcmaster-talks-about-pause-new-panthers-headquarters/ 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Carl Spackler said:

 

5 minutes ago, Carl Spackler said:

Yep, the Post and Courier tweeted (16 hours ago) that "Tepper is taking bids to have the steel beams removed"..sorry no link.

Edited by 3838
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Squirrel said:

I think he will more than willing to walk away.  He will use it as a example for when he wants a new stadium.  He can always use it as a tax right off. 

Not having this complex in Rock Hill will at least make the threat of leaving Charlotte more plausible. 

Edited by Peppers90 NC
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Really? You don't see why a team can't draft a QB in the 1st round while then starting their former #1 overall pick over them while on the last year of their deal? It puts the team in a TERRIBLE place no matter how the season goes.  If Bryce sucks, you have to answer questions as to why he was still on the team to begin with, let alone starting over the rookie.  If he's good, then you run into the situation the Vikings were in last offseason with sticking with the rookie contract or the the guy who just performed instead of said young QB. It's one thing when teams keep a vet around as a bridge QB, it's something entirely different when that QB is still only in their mid 20's and was taken #1 overall by that team.   That just doesn't happen and not sure it ever has in NFL history before.
    • What is the alternative? - BY, will not play for less then his perceived contract (just like Cam Newton did). So you pay him top of market as befitting a 1st round, Heisman winning, playing birthing QB would get. Or you cut him. - Then we are forced to either sign a stop gap QB / previously failed QB and try to fix him or you spend a 1st round pick and draft a guy, basically resetting the team.  The reality is that we all want a top 5 QB. The problem is there are only 5 of those guys in the world and drafting, even #1 overall doesn't guarantee that.  The other problem is the NFL market. Young QB get paid. Even an average, young QB gets top of market deals. I know a lot of people here think we could sign him to an 'average QB contract' but thats not reality. Didnt happen with Cam wont happen with BY.  So we could let this season flush out and he is again a middling QB. But then we cut and restart or accept it is what it is (including compensation) and build a team around what we have.  My money is on the latter. 
×
×
  • Create New...