Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers may now be hesitant to trade back...


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

7 hours ago, stirs said:

Sets up great for the Panthers

slide back and pick up a fantastic OT while letting the Saints mortgage their entire future on some big chances at QB.

Then we pick up a guy in the 2nd with the extra pick and we are on our way.  Next year, when the Saints have no picks, is a much better year for QB anyway

The Saints wouldn't be mortgaging their entire future on a qb, they've signed Winston, so the rookie qb could sit and develop...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

.

Suddenly, an imperfect quarterback class — one that might’ve led to a more patient approach in the draft — might have just become the main draft storyline, with teams knowing they’ll almost certainly need to fend off the Saints to get their guy.

I always laugh when at the beginning of draft season, no qb is going high. Invariably they move up the draft charts. Can set your watch to it.

  • Pie 2
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, KBRed said:

Unfortunately, Matt Rhule is playing for his job, and doesn’t care about next year. So, any chance of bettering our draft for next year, probably won’t happen. 

Not attacking you, but is Rhule making the decisions? I thought Fitterer makes those calls.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, PappyMay said:

I'm so OK with trading down. Probably would catch alot of flack, but could you imagine trading down to the mid to late 20's and picking up a 1st for a QB next year and maybe a 2nd or 3rd this year. Grab Green or Johnson to play guard and roll with BC at LT? Trading down for Penning is what I want to happen, but just thinking worst case here. Lets wait on a QB.

what i'm thinking...1st recover 2nd and 3rd...and next year 1st.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Panthero said:

Not attacking you, but is Rhule making the decisions? I thought Fitterer makes those calls.

Rhule got his choice at choosing the GM, and from my understanding, Rhule edges Fitterer. But, he could have a short leash if that is the case. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, KBRed said:

Rhule got his choice at choosing the GM, and from my understanding, Rhule edges Fitterer. But, he could have a short leash if that is the case. 

10-4 i dont track that info, so have no idea. Yeah if Rhule has a say then we are getting Pickett. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Neal or Ekwonu are there at 6 then take them. If not, trade back. Howell, Ridder, and Strong are just as likely to be NFL qb's as Corral, Willis, and Pickett. This is a very unimpressive qb class. Not sure why everyone loves Fields. He is no better than Darnold. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I mean, if Moore really wants out, then it would behoove the Bears to make it happen sooner than later. X is a lot younger and cheaper, and may be a better fit for Johnson's musings than a disgruntled, unnecessary, overpaid vet. If they can dump his salary and maybe get a fourth or so in return, it may be worth it to them. As for development, I'm not concerned. You're talking about a seeming bust, a day three guy and a UDFA. They are developing relative to their ceilings. I doubt any of them will ever command the coverage, money, or the respect that Moore has acquired. He's a tier above them. Yes, even X. 
    • IMO, if Ceedee plays against us, the game probably goes the other way. Same with Tyreek Hill and the Dolphins. Our team just isn't designed to beat teams with two high level receivers like that. But when you look at the league, how many teams really have two guys of that caliber?  There's nothing wrong with defensive adjustments, but sometimes I think a lot of fans want Evero to call a different play like a game on madden, and defensive football just isn't like that. That said, I thought we did a much better job this season against the Cowboys of flipping Jaycee and at least making them work for it, opposed to last season when they literally just lined CeeDee up on the other side of the field every single snap.  For us to just straight up switch to consistent man coverage, or a different zone, or whatever, we likely would consistently need different personnel on the field. Doing it a few times a game is a gamble and can work, but if we consistently run man coverage against the Cowboys, eventually a RB is going to beat a linebacker, or something of that nature with our personnel. Part of the reason Evero likes this scheme is that, while we have our defaults and presets, what we do is very multiple, and you can do a lot of different things pre and post snap. We are a challenging defense to read. But as you said, if guys are getting beat, it doesn't really matter what you call. 
×
×
  • Create New...