Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

I feel they take a LT at 6 and then...


musicman
 Share

Recommended Posts

Trade next years 1st round pick to be get back in to this years 1st round.. IF... QB Malik is still available late in the round. Probably give up a 5th this year and a 3rd next year to get it. Then all positions of real need have been addresses. Then sign a decent DE/DL still available. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, musicman said:

Trade next years 1st round pick to be get back in to this years 1st round.. IF... QB Malik is still available late in the round. Probably give up a 5th this year and a 3rd next year to get it. Then all positions of real need have been addresses. Then sign a decent DE/DL still available. 

Vikings Headbutt GIF by HISTORY UK

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, musicman said:

Trade next years 1st round pick to be get back in to this years 1st round.. IF... QB Malik is still available late in the round. Probably give up a 5th this year and a 3rd next year to get it. Then all positions of real need have been addresses. Then sign a decent DE/DL still available. 

History repeats. Last time it didn’t workout that well for us. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nope. If they’re realistic they’ll know that trotting a rookie out there (especially Willis) will end in us getting another top 5 pick that was then handed over to the Packers. 
 

Rhule made his bed with Darnold. Get the LT. Let McAdoo do his job and roll with the cards he dealt himself. There is no way wirh next years QB class that Tepper and Fitt let him trade a future 1st. 
 

Young, Stroud, Richardson, and maybe Rattler are ALL better than the top QB in this class. You do not trade that pick. Period. Sorry Matt…

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, musicman said:

Trade next years 1st round pick to be get back in to this years 1st round.. IF... QB Malik is still available late in the round. Probably give up a 5th this year and a 3rd next year to get it. Then all positions of real need have been addresses. Then sign a decent DE/DL still available. 

I will barf we make that mistake…we better not dare trade back into the first

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, unicar15 said:

Nope. If they’re realistic they’ll know that trotting a rookie out there (especially Willis) will end in us getting another top 5 pick that was then handed over to the Packers. 
 

Rhule made his bed with Darnold. Get the LT. Let McAdoo do his job and roll with the cards he dealt himself. There is no way wirh next years QB class that Tepper and Fitt let him trade a future 1st. 
 

Young, Stroud, Richardson, and maybe Rattler are ALL better than the top QB in this class. You do not trade that pick. Period. Sorry Matt…

As much as I despise Rhule and would like nothing better than for him to rot in the bed he made, neither the players or the fans can stomach another year of Darnold 

don’t forget those players have incentives in their contract and some actually aspire to, you know, make it to a playoff game, and that is absolutely not happening with Darnold. 

Too, do not expect the fans in the stadium to be anything other than opposing fans 

why travel to see the worst qb in the league look like the worst qb in the league 

it’s called Hope…and right now, this franchise and it’s fans, have none.  

losing hope in September is a helluva lot worse for a pro football team than losing it in December 

 


 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah and I am doubtful he can offer that consistently. I don’t have many years left at my age and in my view we have wasted two and this whole exercise with him was always a three year minimum.  I am out on that with a guy I don’t believe in, and never believed in, it has sucked. To me it is a costly detour off the right track. Years.    But I am not so rigid that I can’t see excellence. He needs to display it though, consistently before I change my outlook.  
    • No, when I said rage, I meant rage, which only applies to certain fans on this board. Your timeline of trying to assess whether he is the future or not is really tied to the discussions surrounding his second contract. If this team is going to commit to some monster contract while he has shown nothing but glimpses of brilliance would be deservedly worrisome, so the clock is genuinely ticking for him to settle into something resembling his final form. Perhaps a best case scenario is that he plays well, the team succeeds, but he does so with a more limited role that makes the rest of the league view him as a game manager, and his second contract value reflects that. Then he continues to improve and becomes a bargain comparatively while not handicapping the team around him, and we enter an era of consistent championship competitiveness that the fanbase has craved for decades and has never really experienced before. But that requires many, many things to go right and for Bryce himself to facilitate that if he ends up being the quarterback of the future.
    • Exactly. And the flame throwers as well, get location benefits from not going all out. But they have it in reserve.  Not sure how much Greg had but he was an artist.  There was a YouTube I came across last year or maybe even 2023 and I don’t how to even find now but it had two NFL QBs I want say one was Carr from the Raiders but I don’t really remember  The point of it is they stood side by side throwing identical distances to identical targets. Radar gun was used.  They threw the normal effort (not all out) and it was measured etc. Then they were asked to throw their ‘fastball’. They were missing and most often they were missing high. It demonstrated the same principle.    edit: and applying that to arm strength, give me the guy that doesn’t need max effort to have good velocity. The margins are so narrow with less velocity in tne NFL the defenders can Close on it and this is a league where they value down to the 100th of a second level. It is that tight 
×
×
  • Create New...