Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Predict who we are taking


Khyber53
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, DJ feed me moore said:

it literally sucks so hard that we don't have a 2nd

Technically we do. He's currently the starting QB.

What they are most likely looking to do is acquire another 2nd to compensate for what an utter disaster that pick turned out to be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, grimesgoat said:

They need to come out of this with QB competition for Darnold, a difference maker on defense, and solid rotation/future starters at LB, TE, and G. 

This is what we'll do:

1. Trade back with Philly.  6 for 15, 51, and Minstache.

2. If Cross is still there at 15, Take him.  Otherwise trade back with Pittsburg.  15 for 20, 84, 138.  (Pitt moves up for Willis).

3. At 20 we take Devin Lloyd, LB (alternative - Kenyon Greene G or Penning T)

4. At 51 we take Cole Strange G, Rasheed Walker T, or Petit-Frere T (assuming we did not go G/T in First).  (Alternative - Muma LB or possibly Troy Anderson LB).

5. At 84 I could see Barno DE, Cross S, Kolar TE, Robinson RB, or maybe Bruss G/T. 

We would still have 137, 138, 144, 149, 200, and 243 for more projects - but I think the top 2 picks (plus stache) would see the field a lot in 2022.

 

That's a lot a darts to throw at talent. I like where your head is at.

I Like This The Phantom Menace GIF by Star Wars

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

Technically we do. He's currently the starting QB.

What they are most likely looking to do is acquire another 2nd to compensate for what an utter disaster that pick turned out to be.

Yeah, they skipped over that in the presser when they said the Jags corner was our 3rd rounder.  Apparently, the GM didn't want to brag about the very good QB we got in the 2nd round. 

Thomas Davis is currently scheduled to announce our 2nd round pick.  I assume they really want Thomas Davis to get that opportunity.  These drafts continue to be about making up for trading away our picks. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, The Lobo said:

lol Thomas Davis is supposed to announce or second round pick...but we don’t have one. Unless they know something we don’t...

Nah, I heard earlier we were picking at 7 so don't put any stock in what you hear. They will be lucky to get the teams name right. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, MHS831 said:

Cross.  That is what I hope we do

However, I think they will trade with Philly/Balt and end up with Penning AND Howell.

I could see this happening but i hope it doesn't. I want one of the top three LT or Willis. Trading back will give us more draft picks but less quailty to chose from.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah, Bryce has to put that a little deeper. But XL can't allow the pick there. Gotta become the DB when you're undercut like that.
    • You see, I just don't subscribe to a cookie cutter type of philosophy when it comes to trades or team building. Every situation is different. Many may disagree, but I think that FOs that can't draft impact-players beyond the first round aren't really viable.  Just for argument's sake, because we all know this hypothetical trade is as realistic as the moon being made of cheese, Micah is a young dawg really just beginning his prime and is arguably the most valuable pass rusher in the league. He could realistically play at a high level for at least the next five to seven years. Parsons' current trajectory is Canton. That being said, he's not some old merc that fits the mold of "one piece away," he's a core piece to any defense for the better part of the next 10 years. Pass rushers of his caliber and age don't generally become available, so, sure, he'd help an elite team, but he's also a fit for a younger team that's building. I know that you don't agree, but it's all good. I respect your rationale.
    • Here's my not important take on this subject.  Who wouldn't want a pass rusher of his consistency?  I would absolutely love to have him on this defense.   Would I give up Brown in a trade for him.  Nope, I would never do that.  Interior linemen are way to important to be settling for whatever you can get at the position.   Would I trade 2 firsts,  plus fork out a big contract for him?   Without knowing if Young is for sure going to be our long term, franchise guy,  there is no way I'd be okay with letting go 2 firsts. As for the contract that he'd demand, I just dont get caught up with NFL contracts.  They have been out of control for decades.  So I really dont get upset over big contracts. It's just a fact of life in the NFL.  You HAVE to pay for talent. 
×
×
  • Create New...