Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Round 2-3 predictions. Do the Panthers get a pick,?


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

We have very little to trade away in the way of  personnel or draft picks that would interest other teams . We don’t want to give up starters on rookie contracts ,, we have literally no draft capital.  Btw , no one wants Robbie,, we don’t want him,, ( I’d love to eat crow and someone trade for him )

I know many kept saying ‘trade back’ yesterday,, but as we saw,, no one wanted our pick.  There are teams who need QB’s , but the class is not good. We can want to trade back,, but other had no interest. 

Edited by OceanPanther
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I cannot see Fittterer sitting on his hands as 131 picks go by. It's just not in his nature.

Just curious,, what do we have to trade ? Future draft picks ? One of our players on a rookie contract that we already like ? 
I can’t see other teams wanting to help us without us giving up something we don’t want to

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well only 1 QB went in round 1.   So there will be QBs around throughout all round 2. 

I think our front office will struggle not to trade picks in order to have something to sell the average fan on.  Which they shouldn’t.   

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, d-dave said:

I don't think so because what are they trading to move up that high?

Our 4th rounder is a comp pick, so it's right there at the end of the 4th.  We'll have to start moving future draft assets and players.  I'm not sure we're ready to pull that trigger unless someone wants to eat a big fat contract like Sam's or CMC's (who I am against trading).

Nah, we made our bed with the trades for Sam and for the talented yet unproven CB.  Let's try to actually keep next year's draft intact as much as possible.  We can still find good value players in the 4-6 rounds this year due to the COVID push.

While it's not fun as a fan, it's the right thing to do.

It's the last pick of the 4th round, before the Comp picks. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, OceanPanther said:

We have very little to trade away in the way of  personnel or draft picks that would interest other teams . We don’t want to give up starters on rookie contracts ,, we have literally no draft capital.  Btw , no one wants Robbie,, we don’t want him,, ( I’d love to eat crow and someone trade for him )

I know many kept saying ‘trade back’ yesterday,, but as we saw,, no one wanted our pick.  There are teams who need QB’s , but the class is not good. We can want to trade back,, but other had no interest. 

Pretty much - for all the grief Rhule gets, 90% of our best players are still on their rookie contracts. We don't want to trade those.

Fitterer pretty much ruled out trading future picks too, so we're kinda stuck. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looking at the defensive tackles  that are still available,  I see a few we could still add. I would look into adding one of Larry Ogunjobi, Eddie Goldman,  Sheldon Richardson or Danny Shelton. With that being said, trade Derrick Brown to get back into this round. Davion and the other rookie last year showed promise too, while Ionadiss also is a solid player. 

Screenshot_20220429-074210_Samsung Internet.jpg

Edited by Lurk21
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • They said there wasn't clear evidence to warrant the overturn.  How would it have made a difference at that point in the game?   https://www.nbcsports.com/nfl/profootballtalk/rumor-mill/news/nfl-privately-admitted-to-erroneous-reversal-of-catch-by-panthers
    • Me, I'm sick of WWE channel hopping their PLEs and shows. Netflix now with Raw. USA still has Smackdown but you can't get it with Roku if you don't also have cable. Then they went from all the PLEs on Peacock to ESPN+ which required upgrading your Disney+ package. Then they frikkin' move Saturday Night Main Event with John Cena's retirement match back over to frikkin' Peacock, which we'd just cancelled two months prior because no PLEs there anymore. And there are fewer, but longer matches and its the same danged stories again and again. Rematch after rematch after rematch between PLEs. Fewer matches, fewer wrestlers, more promos (of lesser quality) and less action.  It just seems like it's all fillers and re-runs. I'm tired of Cody Rhodes. I'm tired of Jey Uso. I'm tired of the two Brons. Shuffle the deck a bit guys, this game's getting stale.
    • Chuba was 3 yards behind the 3 gap. He was lined up weak offset I. It was a 33 dive. Chuba needed to power through off of Ekwonu's block and slip off into the 5 gap where the Tremble had the lane sealed and Rick pulled the LB out of the 5 gap. Here's a visual if you need proof. Chuba did a jump cut laterally to the 2 gap on the right side with unblocked defenders crashing down and went airborne.   This is a 33 dive that should have been slipped off the block into the 5 gap. Chuba lacked vision, but you can see Rico and Bryce staring at the intended running lane sealed off by Tremble and Ekwonu. He should have read Ekwonu's block. The blocking and misdirection is NOT set up for the right side. The play worked. Chuba failed to execute on this play. Trust who you want to, but I wouldn't suggest you argue with the video. Anyone telling you this was drawn up to go right with the blocking did not analyze it. They are correct it should have been a called dive, and it was a called dive.  This was a weak offset I bringing Tremble in motion from the right to the left.
×
×
  • Create New...