Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The one thing that is nagging at me about our QB pick...


TylerDurden
 Share

Recommended Posts

34 minutes ago, Proudiddy said:

But I'm NGL, and again, as an alum, I have vested interest in the Heels' success, but I can see that...  I dont think having a laid back attitude in interviews should have much, if any bearing on how I feel about a prospect, and likely has little to do with their on-field disposition...  but, watching him in 2020, it wasn't evident because they were having success and didn't encounter much adversity.  But, watching last season, I was bothered by his lack of fire at times.  His leadership did not show up in games, IMO.  He seemed very passive...  now, there are guys that can win that way - leading with their play rather than their voice, but when you watch Corral, his leadership immediately jumps off the screen and he is fiery.  It feels like guys would take a bullet for him, and he would do the same for them.  It makes a difference, imo.

There's other types of leadership than rah rah BS. Dyami Brown was VERY happy he was drafted by Washington.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I feel like Corral’s deep ball issues are overstated. It’s not like he wasn’t capable of throwing a bomb or was way off target. They just didn’t throw it deep very often and when they did he was either on the money or would overthrow (which is what you want, underthrow and get picked). I’ve seen clips of him hitting Moore on deep passes in stride the year before last. It’s just a timing issue and that can easily be coached/developed. I’m really not too worried about him physically except for durability. The big question to me is can he handle the mental side of the game reading defenses, going through progressions etc…

  • Pie 6
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think I'd read a few places that his deep ball miscues were mostly from throwing on the run and not setting his feet - totally coachable, and we now have a guy who can do that in McAdoo, so I'm not overly worried. He's a rook who will make mistakes that he can learn from, plus he can hit the weight room to add about 10 more pounds of muscle if we're genuinely worried about his size/frame/build. It's all in how he approaches his opportunity and either makes it work or doesn't pan out. I'm ok with Corral, and I can't say I would have felt the same with any other QB this draft.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

After rewatching Corral clips tonight, I have to say there's a few things that really stand out:

1) I'm not sure he really has durability concerns, rather, the guy absolutely propels himself into defenders when running.  He just wants the yards and TD and plays with spunk.  For a lighter frame (that he will build out), the kid is a warrior and I see why he's gotten dinged.  He does however need to cool that type of head leaning for yards style.

2) The mid-range placement is quite good (15-25 yards).  I can see the slight under or overthrows on his deep balls but in game clips (not just the highlights) he doesn't hospital ball any of the slants or seam routes.  Always a nice arc, leading the guys downfield, steps into his throws really well.  Will have no issue getting the easy chunks on the CMC screens and DJ slants.  

3) Here's an advantage of being in an RPO offense -- he's used to reading the defense those first few split-seconds and making a quick decision.  Uses his eyes to fake out defenders and he does NOT stare dudes down which I find pretty rare coming out of college.  The guys in pro-offenses with these awesome OL/time develop bad tendencies.  Corral had to face nasty DLs, process fast in-play and make quick decisions.  But his downside comes when he faces man.  I think he'll be able to run offenses effectively in the NFL against zone, but a tight, man heavy defense with disguised blitzes are where he may get into trouble.  

4.) I like his pocket navigation.  Good balanced footwork, not the best in class but he doesn't have glaring issues needing correction

--

Given it's McAdoo, I can see a lot of no huddle, west-coast, quick developing plays, not an extensive route tree; all designed to maximized YAC and keep an up-tempo rhythm.  An issue I see is that outside of CMC and DJ, we don't have the greatest RAC squad.  This is also why I think Higgins makes a run at the active roster and could stick.  But I actually see a bit of a void on the offensive skill player side of things.  Having a quick footed, lightning release RPO guy in Corral will translate pretty fine.  

I'm seeing a lot to be hopeful about.  He has top traits and intangibles that you can't teach which is the preferred type if we're going third rounder.   Not some volume guy with nothing that sets him apart from the other shmucks *cough* Grier

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, davos said:

After rewatching Corral clips tonight, I have to say there's a few things that really stand out:

1) I'm not sure he really has durability concerns, rather, the guy absolutely propels himself into defenders when running.  He just wants the yards and TD and plays with spunk.  For a lighter frame (that he will build out), the kid is a warrior and I see why he's gotten dinged.  He does however need to cool that type of head leaning for yards style.

2) The mid-range placement is quite good (15-25 yards).  I can see the slight under or overthrows on his deep balls but in game clips (not just the highlights) he doesn't hospital ball any of the slants or seam routes.  Always a nice arc, leading the guys downfield, steps into his throws really well.  Will have no issue getting the easy chunks on the CMC screens and DJ slants.  

3) Here's an advantage of being in an RPO offense -- he's used to reading the defense those first few split-seconds and making a quick decision.  Uses his eyes to fake out defenders and he does NOT stare dudes down which I find pretty rare coming out of college.  The guys in pro-offenses with these awesome OL/time develop bad tendencies.  Corral had to face nasty DLs, process fast in-play and make quick decisions.  But his downside comes when he faces man.  I think he'll be able to run offenses effectively in the NFL against zone, but a tight, man heavy defense with disguised blitzes are where he may get into trouble.  

4.) I like his pocket navigation.  Good balanced footwork, not the best in class but he doesn't have glaring issues needing correction

--

Given it's McAdoo, I can see a lot of no huddle, west-coast, quick developing plays, not an extensive route tree; all designed to maximized YAC and keep an up-tempo rhythm.  An issue I see is that outside of CMC and DJ, we don't have the greatest RAC squad.  This is also why I think Higgins makes a run at the active roster and could stick.  But I actually see a bit of a void on the offensive skill player side of things.  Having a quick footed, lightning release RPO guy in Corral will translate pretty fine.  

I'm seeing a lot to be hopeful about.  He has top traits and intangibles that you can't teach which is the preferred type if we're going third rounder.   Not some volume guy with nothing that sets him apart from the other shmucks *cough* Grier

Simplified route concepts are kind of a thing all over these days because it's gotten kind of hard to find college receivers that run a full route tree.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Simplified route concepts are kind of a thing all over these days because it's gotten kind of hard to find college receivers that run a full route tree.

That’s true—it’s also what McAdoo was known for that he was bringing from GB back in the day. Reread a few Giants articles when they brought him in before becoming HC. We definitely brought in an interesting dude. Depending on what new shades he’s added to his offense, it may be nice to have a consistently faster paced offense and not just one that only forces itself into no huddle situations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, davos said:

After rewatching Corral clips tonight, I have to say there's a few things that really stand out:

1) I'm not sure he really has durability concerns, rather, the guy absolutely propels himself into defenders when running.  He just wants the yards and TD and plays with spunk.  For a lighter frame (that he will build out), the kid is a warrior and I see why he's gotten dinged.  He does however need to cool that type of head leaning for yards style.

2) The mid-range placement is quite good (15-25 yards).  I can see the slight under or overthrows on his deep balls but in game clips (not just the highlights) he doesn't hospital ball any of the slants or seam routes.  Always a nice arc, leading the guys downfield, steps into his throws really well.  Will have no issue getting the easy chunks on the CMC screens and DJ slants.  

3) Here's an advantage of being in an RPO offense -- he's used to reading the defense those first few split-seconds and making a quick decision.  Uses his eyes to fake out defenders and he does NOT stare dudes down which I find pretty rare coming out of college.  The guys in pro-offenses with these awesome OL/time develop bad tendencies.  Corral had to face nasty DLs, process fast in-play and make quick decisions.  But his downside comes when he faces man.  I think he'll be able to run offenses effectively in the NFL against zone, but a tight, man heavy defense with disguised blitzes are where he may get into trouble.  

4.) I like his pocket navigation.  Good balanced footwork, not the best in class but he doesn't have glaring issues needing correction

--

Given it's McAdoo, I can see a lot of no huddle, west-coast, quick developing plays, not an extensive route tree; all designed to maximized YAC and keep an up-tempo rhythm.  An issue I see is that outside of CMC and DJ, we don't have the greatest RAC squad.  This is also why I think Higgins makes a run at the active roster and could stick.  But I actually see a bit of a void on the offensive skill player side of things.  Having a quick footed, lightning release RPO guy in Corral will translate pretty fine.  

I'm seeing a lot to be hopeful about.  He has top traits and intangibles that you can't teach which is the preferred type if we're going third rounder.   Not some volume guy with nothing that sets him apart from the other shmucks *cough* Grier

I think he's the best in the pocket/under pressure in this class, who's better? It's not Pickett or Malik

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’ve said it from the beginning. Corral has the most upside of anyone in this draft. That’s why they took him. If Corral hadn’t had the off-field stuff, the injury, and played in the Mountain West he would have been seen in the same light as Zach Wilson. 

The strength staff is going to put weight on him and work on his durability. The byproduct of that is picking up strength in his hips, quads, lower legs that is going to give him an even stronger arm. He is built like a high school senior right now. When he fills out and looks like an actual NFL QB it’s gonna be scary. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stuff like this is why I did not become too hung up on one particular QB. If the staff selected Howell I would have hoped for the best. But they and others felt Corral was the better prospect. I honestly agree. Heels fans are going to have to move on it's been a couple days join us in the real world now folks.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, WOW!! said:

I was a Howell guy and still think he was the most consistent producers in this QB class.. With Corral right behind him.. 

But we might have to admit maybe we were wrong...

Corral was Atleast consistently ranked 1 2 or 3 in the QB prospect rankings.. Howell wasn't.. And the league has spoken.. 32 teams passed on him 6x ...

Is this true?  Haven’t seen anything about this and very surprised by this if it is true…

Grabbed the wrong post…is it true he was drunk and high in interviews?

Edited by Shocker
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In before: "XL sucks, there is no hope." "As long as we have Bryce, none of this matters." My response: "It's X, not XL...we're not discussing apparel sizes, or we'd have to consider XS."  
    • Alain Pierre provides some food for thought on Last Word On Sports regarding Xavier Legette, and his article, though specifically on X, kind of puts me in the mind of QBs being overdrafted and put into situations that they're not prepared for, some ultimately failing due to drafting missteps by front offices who don't necessarily view prospective players within the contextual importance that situations demand.  At this point, Legette looks like a failure in reference to expectations, of not only what a consistently productive NFL receiver looks like, but a first round pick (which he obviously should never have been). But the story on X isn't necessarily completely over. Damn. I seem to be experiencing deja vu...It wasn't X's fault that he was overdrafted, that was a choice by an FO that obviously downplayed actual realized skill vs outstanding measurables and upside. Sure, the FO was impressed by X's one-year feats during his senior season at South Carolina, but it was the NFL god, RAS (a.k.a. Raw Athletic Score), that had Dave Canales's and Dan Morgan's jaws dropping in amazement at the sight of X running around in underwear at the Combine...   "At 6-foot-3 and over 220 pounds, Legette brought rare athletic upside to the position. His breakout season at South Carolina showed flashes of dominance that NFL teams dream of. Projecting forward, many scouts compared his physical profile to D.K. Metcalf, and the Panthers clearly believed they could develop him into a true wide receiver 1 over time. The issue was never his talent. The issue was the timeline. Just a few picks later, the Chargers selected Ladd McConkey, a receiver who may have lacked Xavier Legette’s physical ceiling but entered the league far more technically refined. McConkey immediately showed advanced route discipline, leverage awareness, good pacing, and separation ability.  Bryce Young’s game has always depended on timing and anticipation. His best football at Alabama came with receivers capable of winning through precision rather than pure athleticism. Jameson Williams and John Metchie III were excellent route runners and were able to get drafted in 2022. McConkey naturally fit that style of play. Legette, meanwhile, needed significant development in the exact areas where Bryce Young needed help. The Panthers drafted traits when Bryce Young needed reliability."   Yes, the FO was guilty. The good thing is that the execs appear to be improving. Some of that may be attributed to the hiring of Eric Eager (who was hired right after the Xavier Legette draft). Eager seems to have helped the Panthers FO fine-tune their analytical progress, and, at least on paper, they acquired players with a lot of value during the last draft in regards to actually (what I'll refer to as) "underdrafting" talent relative to their position with value already built in.  Look at Chris Brazzell: He may be more of the quintessential project receiver who was arguably more or less just as raw as Legette was when he was drafted, and with a relatively high RAS as well. The notable difference is value, as Brazzell was a round three pick and Legette was a first rounder.    "Unlike the Xavier Legette situation, Carolina’s environment for Brazzell is completely different. "The Panthers are not asking a raw receiver prospect to stabilize this offense for Bryce Young. "Brazzell enters a much healthier developmental situation with far less pressure. With Tetairoa McMillan established as the primary target and Jalen Coker continuing to settle as the number 2 option...Xavier Legette, Metchie III, and Jimmy Horn Jr. are also still in this rotation, fighting for reps. "It gives Carolina something they failed to give Legette when they drafted him: A developmental runway. "Xavier Legette entered the league with expectations attached to a first-round pick and an offense desperate for answers. Brazzell enters a room where he can spend a year working on his route running, learning the playbook, and earning snaps gradually rather than being asked to become part of Bryce Young’s solution immediately. "And truthfully, Brazzell needs that time coming out of college. Despite his elite physical tools, many evaluators have several concerns about his overall polish as a receiver. "His route tree at Tennessee was viewed as fairly limited due to the type of offense that they run. The receivers are expected to run a lot of choice routes, which are dictated by the placement of the defenders. It doesn’t require technical route-running and an understanding of the playbook needed at the NFL level...   "Context changes significantly when expectations change. "The Panthers are not depending on Brazzell to save the offense. They can allow him to develop slowly, expand his route tree, improve his technical refinement, and learn behind a much more stable receiver room... "Traits become much easier to bet on when patience is built into the plan."   It's all about understanding your situation. I don't agree that it's an inherently difficult choice like the author is suggesting in the following excerpt. At the very least, I think that it should be easier as long as all parties involved stay levelheaded and true to their process.    "That is what makes these draft decisions so difficult. "Every front office believes it can find the next Metcalf, Owens, or Marshall. Sometimes they do. More often, they are betting on a development path that may take years to complete. "The challenge is understanding what your offense needs right now. "If a team has patience, stability, and a quarterback capable of carrying the offense while a receiver develops, betting on traits can make sense. But if a young quarterback needs immediate help, there is a strong argument for prioritizing the receiver who already knows how to separate, create throwing , and earn trust from day one. "That’s why the Xavier Legette-Ladd McConkey debate remains so fascinating. "It was never really a discussion about talent. It was a discussion about timing."   For me, Ladd McConkey was talented enough in his own right, that the gap--the upside--was never as big as people are suggesting between not only McConkey and Legette, but McConkey and other receivers drafted in the first round during that draft. The technique divide between Ladd and X was pretty stark though, as was the roughly 35 pounds, but the speed was identical, the maybe 1½ height difference isn't huge (6' and 6'1"), and it may surprise some that Ladd's RAS (9.34) was also enough to put him in the top 10 percent of receivers since 1987. There is an argument that he would've been a better pick for Bryce and the Panthers, regardless of timeline and talent. But, I still appreciate the thesis (if you will) of the article, as it still provides some hope--perhaps a glimmer at this point, that X's RAS may finally translate to the NFL given more time, but, perhaps more importantly, it explains how Dan Morgan and company are showing improvement, even if it appears somewhat understated. My hope is that continued improvement is palpable by this time next year. https://lastwordonsports.com/nfl/2026/05/30/xavier-legette-draft-lessons/#google_vignette        
    • Won’t stop until people stop buying overpriced poo.
×
×
  • Create New...