Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Do you think there is a legitimate chance we sign Clowney? Considering his price tag, does it even make sense for us?


Julio
 Share

Recommended Posts

16 minutes ago, Pakmeng said:

What is his price tag? 

There are rumors that the Browns offered a two year deal worth $24m. We’d need to match or beat that, which would near Haason Reddick territory at that point.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Pakmeng said:

What is his price tag? 

This is the number one question.

16 minutes ago, xPariahx said:

I bet he stays in Cleveland. I only want him if he's cheap. That's the only way it makes sense.

Cheap doesn’t seem like it makes sense for any pro bowl level player. Why would offer his services for cheap you’d never sign up for a job and look to save the job money. He’s worth a decent two year deal and he’s excellent against the run and a decent pass rusher. We can scheme up blitzes and pressure but our run D was atrocious he makes to much sense. No one goes into the season thinking we are tanking we trying to win and you need skill players to do that.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, MHS831 said:

He is inconsistent and wears out his welcome quickly. I think he is motivated by money and not the love of the game.  Hard Pass.

Hes trying to bleed any foolish team dumb enough to sign him. Only time he's motivated is when he's playing for a contract. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Julio said:

There are rumors that the Browns offered a two year deal worth $24m. We’d need to match or beat that, which would near Haason Reddick territory at that point.

He made $8M last season on what was more or less a "one year, show us what you've got" deal.  So the rumors about what Cleveland has on the table are not unreasonable, especially since the Browns are not oozing DL talent, other than Garrett.

Whether he and his agent think it is reasonable is another question.  I could see it coming down to who is willing to guarantee him the most over the longest term, which given some of his injuries would be a gamble. 

There is also speculation that the only teams that would be a threat to the Browns resigning him are closer to home, so us, the Falcons, Jags, or Titans.  I'm not sure who out of that group would be interested enough to aggressively pursue him and vice-versa.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, trucpfan said:

This is the number one question.

Cheap doesn’t seem like it makes sense for any pro bowl level player. Why would offer his services for cheap you’d never sign up for a job and look to save the job money. He’s worth a decent two year deal and he’s excellent against the run and a decent pass rusher. We can scheme up blitzes and pressure but our run D was atrocious he makes to much sense. No one goes into the season thinking we are tanking we trying to win and you need skill players to do that.

My point is, I don't think he's worth over paying for. We start next year over the cap. He definitely would help. I think what im saying isn't that hard to decipher. He also has a reputation for only playing when he wants to soooo. Go get him if only if his price is respectable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

He is inconsistent and wears out his welcome quickly. I think he is motivated by money and not the love of the game.  Hard Pass.

He is good against the run.  We are REAL bad against the run.  Can't hurt and we have cap space. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

They need to makeup for the loss of Riddick. No two ways about it. If they want a decent pass rusher and run stopper, then they will have to spend some of that cap $$$.

Cheaping out at the edge will not win them games.....but could definitely lose them some. If not Clowney, then someone else who can do the job.

Edited by Jmac
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That’s not a bad idea at all. I was really liking the whole cali-style carne asada. We might do that next week instead of enchiladas for the rams. Was planning on: Saints-Gumbo Tampa-Cuban Sandwiches Seattle- Salmon Stew Tampa- Seafood Boil 
    • I agree, honestly you can not trade a player that has Balls talent. Just sitting in street clothes FOR years, it doesn't matter if you are averaging 50points on 88% with 18 rebs, 15 asst, 4 stls if you never can play. These are the worst type of players, teasers. Its HIS JOB to get his body in NBA shape and he has proven that he can not. Thus you break the rule about trading top shelf talent. Hell NBA need to have NFL contracts where the full sum isn't guaranteed, you bet your ass if his money was tied to his playing on the court he'd somehow figure out how to stay healthy.   Plus Im a old head, I member when Seth Curry in his 17(Jesus..) year career had ankle problems and guess what, he solved the issues and got all the money, championships, and fame. Ball doesn't have the same drive to figure out his body, he'd rather drive his car on kids feet while rushing home to drive his go-cart on the roof of his condo after missing his 42nd game of the season.....
×
×
  • Create New...