Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Panthers are the worst rated team in Madden 23


Recommended Posts

Team rank means nothing on Madden. The Panthers have good players at the right spots to be a deadly team. If the Panthers just find a QB that doesn't throw the ball to the other team so much see how that changes 

Edited by NCBlu
Misprint
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, NCBlu said:

Team rank means nothing on Madden. The Panthers have good players at the right spots to be a deadly team. If the Panthers just find a QB that doesn't throw the ball to the other team so much see how that changes 

We need a coach and a QB. Unfortunately, those are the two must have pieces. You can have a perennially great team that has weaknesses practically anywhere else but you cannot be weak at QB or coach if you want to consistently compete.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is silly.  We hate PFF ratings but put stock into madden ratings?   That's where this place is now?  We get it, everyone wants to be negative about the team all the time.  It just seems exhausting to me.

Edited by Tr3ach
  • Pie 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Tr3ach said:

This is silly.  We hate PFF ratings but put stock into madden ratings?   That's where this place is now?  We get it, everyone wants to be negative about the team all the time.  It just seems exhausting to me.

Nobody needed Madden ratings to know that we've been a bad team for a while now.

It ultimately serves as a "kick em while they're down" type thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Basically agree.  He is the one of that bunch that offers upgraded pass catching along with he is supposed to be kind of special.   Then you have the OL and the ideas that if they perform you can have JAG backs and still do well. So okay we could be fine.  But Brooks is important and to me that receiving element sets him apart.  So there sure is something riding on him.     What strikes me as incongruent is people over in Atlanta or those that follow them look at Penix with a third surgery and act like it is no big deal.      And we are on pins and needles over Brooks.  Either they should worry a lot more or we should worry a lot less.  
    • I usually go a game or two optimist over the consensus here but this is too early for me to say. I need to see some players on the field.  I am not feeling real optimistic though.  
    • Okay as a ‘take CJ’ fan I actually don’t obsess over CJ and Houston, contrary to the narrative.  But I thought I picked up some noise that his OL left a lot to be desired.    Not a single Beyce supporter would judge him harshly if he had a crappy OL. We all know that.    So be fair about it.  A QB needs to be protected.  Especially a guy that gets to his spot and wants to finish the play from there. Which CJ is.  
×
×
  • Create New...