Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Panthers are the worst rated team in Madden 23


Recommended Posts

Team rank means nothing on Madden. The Panthers have good players at the right spots to be a deadly team. If the Panthers just find a QB that doesn't throw the ball to the other team so much see how that changes 

Edited by NCBlu
Misprint
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, NCBlu said:

Team rank means nothing on Madden. The Panthers have good players at the right spots to be a deadly team. If the Panthers just find a QB that doesn't throw the ball to the other team so much see how that changes 

We need a coach and a QB. Unfortunately, those are the two must have pieces. You can have a perennially great team that has weaknesses practically anywhere else but you cannot be weak at QB or coach if you want to consistently compete.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is silly.  We hate PFF ratings but put stock into madden ratings?   That's where this place is now?  We get it, everyone wants to be negative about the team all the time.  It just seems exhausting to me.

Edited by Tr3ach
  • Pie 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Tr3ach said:

This is silly.  We hate PFF ratings but put stock into madden ratings?   That's where this place is now?  We get it, everyone wants to be negative about the team all the time.  It just seems exhausting to me.

Nobody needed Madden ratings to know that we've been a bad team for a while now.

It ultimately serves as a "kick em while they're down" type thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is about getting open and YAC....and the QB we have.  You basically are just highlighting average depth when targeted vs 2 players. .  And yeah, I often say AT is a small slow reliable TE in terms of what he does for us.   That's what he is.   I think a couple of you want to make this into a Renfrow argument.   I'm a Renfrow fan.  Renfrow does not check the box of what a BY O needs either at the slot.  Renfrow just a niche roleplayer at this level.  it's easy to look up how horrific AT is with the ball in his hands and in terms of getting open.....and it's also easy to look up what a low ceiling of an offense the steady AT diet produces w/ BY. 
    • The one time he's actively tried to lose was the best we've ever done.
    • I simply acknowledge BY is the QB.  And just like we did when we drafted him.....the type O you would need to setup around him for success was always pretty simple.  But we have done virtually the opposite.  XL dropping some passes isn't why we were ranked the 32nd O and 30th passing the past 2 years.  *Ricky Prohel was brought up only in regards to role function he served on the team.  Niche/specialist.   He wasn't eating up the snaps in the O.    AT should have a similar snap %. People could MAUL Ricky Prohel and put hands all over him.   We got to the Super Bowl in part because we were mauling guys (our slot CB).   You can't do that now.  AT has a MUCH easier life and still can't get open.  Or run.    If you live in 3 WR sets, with a weak armed QB, and you choose to put someone who can't get open or run in the slot.......well, your are going to have a weak pass O.  That's by design IMO.  
×
×
  • Create New...