Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Chelsea set to name ex-Man City, Carolina Panthers executive Tom Glick in top director role


Recommended Posts

Chelsea is fishy as hell.  Everyone quit Chelsea front office after Russian sugar daddy owner and close Putin friend got banned.  Chelsea was purchased by the American guy including investment company Clearlake Capital (private equity firm) that got an investment of $50 billion in 2020 out of the blue (they were worth $7.1B and company only 15 years old).  Clearlake Capital is funneling money back into Chelsea.  Some believe ex Chelsea and Putin closest friend Roman Abramovich set up shell company and indirectly owns Chelsea and uses American guy as face of the franchise.

Glick, who ran Manchester City that is owned by another sugar daddy aka Sheikh Mansour bin Zayed Al Nahyan aka Royal princess of Abu Dhabi is known for using shell companies to funnel money into the club.  He helped develop a scheme where prince of Abu Dhabi owned all Manchester City sponsors and gave himself outrages contracts to bypass FairPlay rules (expenses cannot exceed revenue so he used sponsors to give the team insane contracts to make revenue look inflated).

That’s Glick to you ladies and gentleman. 

  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/1/2022 at 6:25 PM, TheCasillas said:

Well that explains a lot. I will rescind my comment about Tepper being the reason Glick left when the event occurred. Just shows I have no idea wtf im talking about when it comes to behind close doors situations at BoA. 

Yeah but hell, none of us really do.  I say it’s the off-season and just let it fly.  
 

Reaction GIF by moodman

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/1/2022 at 6:01 PM, Ja Rhule said:

Chelsea is fishy as hell.  Everyone quit Chelsea front office after Russian sugar daddy owner and close Putin friend got banned.  Chelsea was purchased by the American guy including investment company Clearlake Capital (private equity firm) that got an investment of $50 billion in 2020 out of the blue (they were worth $7.1B and company only 15 years old).  Clearlake Capital is funneling money back into Chelsea.  Some believe ex Chelsea and Putin closest friend Roman Abramovich set up shell company and indirectly owns Chelsea and uses American guy as face of the franchise.

Glick, who ran Manchester City that is owned by another sugar daddy aka Sheikh Mansour bin Zayed Al Nahyan aka Royal princess of Abu Dhabi is known for using shell companies to funnel money into the club.  He helped develop a scheme where prince of Abu Dhabi owned all Manchester City sponsors and gave himself outrages contracts to bypass FairPlay rules (expenses cannot exceed revenue so he used sponsors to give the team insane contracts to make revenue look inflated).

That’s Glick to you ladies and gentleman. 

Sir, that's a conspiracy and I've been told on here, conspiracies are only correct 5% of the time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/1/2022 at 6:01 PM, Ja Rhule said:

Chelsea is fishy as hell.  Everyone quit Chelsea front office after Russian sugar daddy owner and close Putin friend got banned.  Chelsea was purchased by the American guy including investment company Clearlake Capital (private equity firm) that got an investment of $50 billion in 2020 out of the blue (they were worth $7.1B and company only 15 years old).  Clearlake Capital is funneling money back into Chelsea.  Some believe ex Chelsea and Putin closest friend Roman Abramovich set up shell company and indirectly owns Chelsea and uses American guy as face of the franchise.

Glick, who ran Manchester City that is owned by another sugar daddy aka Sheikh Mansour bin Zayed Al Nahyan aka Royal princess of Abu Dhabi is known for using shell companies to funnel money into the club.  He helped develop a scheme where prince of Abu Dhabi owned all Manchester City sponsors and gave himself outrages contracts to bypass FairPlay rules (expenses cannot exceed revenue so he used sponsors to give the team insane contracts to make revenue look inflated).

That’s Glick to you ladies and gentleman. 

Salty Arsenal supporter.  In truth you could be right but Chelsea are better off with the new owners
 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Sir. You have been shouting down any and all valid skepticism and criticism of our #1 overall pick for 2+ years running. You spent all last spring running cover for him and complaining about derails and toxicity only for us to open the season with back to back blowout losses largely contributed by Bryce Young's abysmal play. You have engaged in the exact same formula this spring. You've spent the last two months rage pooing my posts like an angry ten year old even while you've had me on ignore just for speaking the truth about this QB room and our offense. We opened the season with yet another blowout loss this time to a previously 4 win team. And here you are still trying to play the victim while weaponizing the reactions. Any suggestion of you being victimized by anyone else here is a complete and utter farce. You know it. I know it. Have yourself a great day.
    • If he went to Clemson he would be off the board. Still hard to believe they have never drafted a Clemson player.
    • Simply put, Evero has been shafted during his time here. The talent we left him to play with last season was criminal. They've invested some more into the D this offseason, but it's still a unit that's woefully short of talent.  We should have let him walk in the offseason when he wanted to go. 
×
×
  • Create New...