Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Chelsea set to name ex-Man City, Carolina Panthers executive Tom Glick in top director role


Recommended Posts

Chelsea is fishy as hell.  Everyone quit Chelsea front office after Russian sugar daddy owner and close Putin friend got banned.  Chelsea was purchased by the American guy including investment company Clearlake Capital (private equity firm) that got an investment of $50 billion in 2020 out of the blue (they were worth $7.1B and company only 15 years old).  Clearlake Capital is funneling money back into Chelsea.  Some believe ex Chelsea and Putin closest friend Roman Abramovich set up shell company and indirectly owns Chelsea and uses American guy as face of the franchise.

Glick, who ran Manchester City that is owned by another sugar daddy aka Sheikh Mansour bin Zayed Al Nahyan aka Royal princess of Abu Dhabi is known for using shell companies to funnel money into the club.  He helped develop a scheme where prince of Abu Dhabi owned all Manchester City sponsors and gave himself outrages contracts to bypass FairPlay rules (expenses cannot exceed revenue so he used sponsors to give the team insane contracts to make revenue look inflated).

That’s Glick to you ladies and gentleman. 

  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/1/2022 at 6:25 PM, TheCasillas said:

Well that explains a lot. I will rescind my comment about Tepper being the reason Glick left when the event occurred. Just shows I have no idea wtf im talking about when it comes to behind close doors situations at BoA. 

Yeah but hell, none of us really do.  I say it’s the off-season and just let it fly.  
 

Reaction GIF by moodman

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/1/2022 at 6:01 PM, Ja Rhule said:

Chelsea is fishy as hell.  Everyone quit Chelsea front office after Russian sugar daddy owner and close Putin friend got banned.  Chelsea was purchased by the American guy including investment company Clearlake Capital (private equity firm) that got an investment of $50 billion in 2020 out of the blue (they were worth $7.1B and company only 15 years old).  Clearlake Capital is funneling money back into Chelsea.  Some believe ex Chelsea and Putin closest friend Roman Abramovich set up shell company and indirectly owns Chelsea and uses American guy as face of the franchise.

Glick, who ran Manchester City that is owned by another sugar daddy aka Sheikh Mansour bin Zayed Al Nahyan aka Royal princess of Abu Dhabi is known for using shell companies to funnel money into the club.  He helped develop a scheme where prince of Abu Dhabi owned all Manchester City sponsors and gave himself outrages contracts to bypass FairPlay rules (expenses cannot exceed revenue so he used sponsors to give the team insane contracts to make revenue look inflated).

That’s Glick to you ladies and gentleman. 

Sir, that's a conspiracy and I've been told on here, conspiracies are only correct 5% of the time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/1/2022 at 6:01 PM, Ja Rhule said:

Chelsea is fishy as hell.  Everyone quit Chelsea front office after Russian sugar daddy owner and close Putin friend got banned.  Chelsea was purchased by the American guy including investment company Clearlake Capital (private equity firm) that got an investment of $50 billion in 2020 out of the blue (they were worth $7.1B and company only 15 years old).  Clearlake Capital is funneling money back into Chelsea.  Some believe ex Chelsea and Putin closest friend Roman Abramovich set up shell company and indirectly owns Chelsea and uses American guy as face of the franchise.

Glick, who ran Manchester City that is owned by another sugar daddy aka Sheikh Mansour bin Zayed Al Nahyan aka Royal princess of Abu Dhabi is known for using shell companies to funnel money into the club.  He helped develop a scheme where prince of Abu Dhabi owned all Manchester City sponsors and gave himself outrages contracts to bypass FairPlay rules (expenses cannot exceed revenue so he used sponsors to give the team insane contracts to make revenue look inflated).

That’s Glick to you ladies and gentleman. 

Salty Arsenal supporter.  In truth you could be right but Chelsea are better off with the new owners
 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...