Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Chelsea set to name ex-Man City, Carolina Panthers executive Tom Glick in top director role

TheSpecialJuan

By TheSpecialJuan,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Ja Rhule Grand Master

Ja Rhule

Posted
Posted

Chelsea is fishy as hell.  Everyone quit Chelsea front office after Russian sugar daddy owner and close Putin friend got banned.  Chelsea was purchased by the American guy including investment company Clearlake Capital (private equity firm) that got an investment of $50 billion in 2020 out of the blue (they were worth $7.1B and company only 15 years old).  Clearlake Capital is funneling money back into Chelsea.  Some believe ex Chelsea and Putin closest friend Roman Abramovich set up shell company and indirectly owns Chelsea and uses American guy as face of the franchise.

Glick, who ran Manchester City that is owned by another sugar daddy aka Sheikh Mansour bin Zayed Al Nahyan aka Royal princess of Abu Dhabi is known for using shell companies to funnel money into the club.  He helped develop a scheme where prince of Abu Dhabi owned all Manchester City sponsors and gave himself outrages contracts to bypass FairPlay rules (expenses cannot exceed revenue so he used sponsors to give the team insane contracts to make revenue look inflated).

That’s Glick to you ladies and gentleman. 

  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Pejorative Miscreant Veteran

Pejorative Miscreant

Posted
Posted
On 7/1/2022 at 6:25 PM, TheCasillas said:

Well that explains a lot. I will rescind my comment about Tepper being the reason Glick left when the event occurred. Just shows I have no idea wtf im talking about when it comes to behind close doors situations at BoA. 

Yeah but hell, none of us really do.  I say it’s the off-season and just let it fly.  
 

Reaction GIF by moodman

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Cam's New Arm Proficient

Cam's New Arm

Posted
Posted
On 7/1/2022 at 6:01 PM, Ja Rhule said:

Chelsea is fishy as hell.  Everyone quit Chelsea front office after Russian sugar daddy owner and close Putin friend got banned.  Chelsea was purchased by the American guy including investment company Clearlake Capital (private equity firm) that got an investment of $50 billion in 2020 out of the blue (they were worth $7.1B and company only 15 years old).  Clearlake Capital is funneling money back into Chelsea.  Some believe ex Chelsea and Putin closest friend Roman Abramovich set up shell company and indirectly owns Chelsea and uses American guy as face of the franchise.

Glick, who ran Manchester City that is owned by another sugar daddy aka Sheikh Mansour bin Zayed Al Nahyan aka Royal princess of Abu Dhabi is known for using shell companies to funnel money into the club.  He helped develop a scheme where prince of Abu Dhabi owned all Manchester City sponsors and gave himself outrages contracts to bypass FairPlay rules (expenses cannot exceed revenue so he used sponsors to give the team insane contracts to make revenue look inflated).

That’s Glick to you ladies and gentleman. 

Sir, that's a conspiracy and I've been told on here, conspiracies are only correct 5% of the time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Shocker Grand Master

Shocker

Posted
Posted
On 7/1/2022 at 6:01 PM, Ja Rhule said:

Chelsea is fishy as hell.  Everyone quit Chelsea front office after Russian sugar daddy owner and close Putin friend got banned.  Chelsea was purchased by the American guy including investment company Clearlake Capital (private equity firm) that got an investment of $50 billion in 2020 out of the blue (they were worth $7.1B and company only 15 years old).  Clearlake Capital is funneling money back into Chelsea.  Some believe ex Chelsea and Putin closest friend Roman Abramovich set up shell company and indirectly owns Chelsea and uses American guy as face of the franchise.

Glick, who ran Manchester City that is owned by another sugar daddy aka Sheikh Mansour bin Zayed Al Nahyan aka Royal princess of Abu Dhabi is known for using shell companies to funnel money into the club.  He helped develop a scheme where prince of Abu Dhabi owned all Manchester City sponsors and gave himself outrages contracts to bypass FairPlay rules (expenses cannot exceed revenue so he used sponsors to give the team insane contracts to make revenue look inflated).

That’s Glick to you ladies and gentleman. 

Salty Arsenal supporter.  In truth you could be right but Chelsea are better off with the new owners
 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • CRA
      Where would the Panthers be if they sat Bryce Young last season?

      By CRA · Posted

      And I’m fine with that.   But, with an impatient owner….that carries high odds of just him employing a new HC in the not distant future.  The “we will see if the scheme that doesn’t fit our #1 overall pick QB works or not” approach seems like a rocky plan for all.  If I was Canales I would give it shot but demanded I need to be able to sign a legit backup QB in case what I was given just doesn’t work and can transition at the end of the year 
    • PNW_PantherMan
      Where would the Panthers be if they sat Bryce Young last season?

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      That's really unlikely to happen.  The reality is, they are building for what Canales wants to do.  That's what all coaches do.  And if Bryce can't do that, he's another peg that has to be replaced.
    • Gapanthersfan
      Where would the Panthers be if they sat Bryce Young last season?

      By Gapanthersfan · Posted

      There is nothing unpopular at all about your opinion. How everything played out on the field backs it up. Bryce starts the season with much fanfare, gives the atl game away, and showed anyone who watched that his arm talent was shockingly bad. bad look, so after a few weeks, the team cooks up a fake injury that nobody saw, presumably to decide what direction to go next. Enter Dalton for one game while Bryce is seen walking comfortably on the sideline, smiling and yucking it up like he’s a 5 year vet.  Dalton performs admirably given the circumstances (please no Dalton ve Bryce retort). The contrast between the two was so strong that it’s still debated today. If Dalton’s performance was similar to what Bryce had done up to that point, I truly believe they would have sat Bryce longer, but it wasn’t.  Dalton relied on vet savvy and a better arm. It’s debatable how many games that gets us. Meaningless to fans, but not to players with serious financial incentives on the line.  What it really was, was a ‘young man (see what I did?)’ playing a grown man’s game, who lacked basic fundamentals and essential physical talent, behind a line that was VERY ill suited for the scheme forced on them, WRs who looked completely confused and unmotivated, with a back stabbing coaching staff in give up mode, GM who I wouldn’t trust to organize my cooking utensil drawer and an owner who meets with coaches every week and tells them which plays he likes and which ones he doesn’t.  Bryce doesn’t get a mulligan, but I’m willing to give him a ‘my bad’ from the team. Last season stunk worse than Bigfoot’s di**. It literally can’t get ANY worse than the unwatchable sh** show that was last year.  I have to see a monumental change in his physical ability and overall confidence. I have to see that he found a laser arm, somewhere, in the offseason, or everything else is irrelevant. 
×
×
  • Create New...