Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Matt Corrall


NAS
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Let's hear this history, wise sage.

Peyton Manning was 11-of-21 with 2 interceptions and 123 yards in his preseason debut.

On an off note, not that you have to agree..

 

I think you've lost all objectivity when it comes to Corral. I don't know what you expect with him getting so little practical time in TC. He's a rookie doing the bulk of his real learning during these preseason games. He's going to have to take his lumps traveling on a rocky road. 

Baby steps...

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, top dawg said:

Peyton Manning was 11-of-21 with 2 interceptions and 123 yards in his preseason debut.

On an off note, not that you have to agree..

 

I think you've lost all objectivity when it comes to Corral. I don't know what you expect with him getting so little practical time in TC. He's a rookie doing the bulk of his real learning during these preseason games. He's going to have to take his lumps traveling on a rocky road. 

Baby steps...

Peyton Manning. When you have to go back a quarter century to "prove" to our point I think you've lost all objectivity.

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I mean it's early but so far out of all the big name guys willis picket corral and ridder, I think we have the worst. Just doesn't pop or wow with what I have seen so far. That undeniable talent. 

Has been really what a rookie who isn't getting many reps should look like. I don't see him as the future.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, micnificent28 said:

I mean it's early but so far out of all the big name guys willis picket corral and ridder, I think we have the worst. Just doesn't pop or wow with what I have seen so far. That undeniable talent. 

Has been really what a rookie who isn't getting many reps should look like. I don't see him as the future.

Those other guys haven't played yet this week so it's all camp hearsay til they step on the field Tmrw-Mon. I think they've all been put in better situations to succeed based on camp reps and better coaching for the most part. Ridder maybe not better actual coach but def more reps to be prepared

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think I can guess who here didn't play ball at a high level in high school or beyond based solely on this thread.

 

Corral doesn't look like a starter. He's not expected to look like a starter. Nobody with a brain expected him to impress, only to show some progression and capability. He has. Not at a starter level, but for a young raw kid, he's showing most people a little bit of ability. He looks like a kid with good physical tools, good mechanics and footwork, and improvisational talent when needed.

He has promise. He isn't ready. To write him off as a bust now is dumb. To say anything more glowing than is typed here is dumb. Can we just lock this thread now? We're all worse off now for reading some of these takes.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Peyton Manning. When you have to go back a quarter century to "prove" to our point I think you've lost all objectivity.

Yeah, OK.

Manning is arguably the most notable. 

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.nfl.com/_amp/troy-aikman-peyton-manning-among-qbs-with-bad-first-starts-0ap3000000445192

I'm not trying to prove anything, just stating information. Furthermore,  no one can prove anything to a person who's not receptive or has made up their mind about something.

If you don't see what others see, that's your prerogative. But, patience really is a virtue in the face of knee-jerk reactions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, lightsout said:

I think I can guess who here didn't play ball at a high level in high school or beyond based solely on this thread.

 

Corral doesn't look like a starter. He's not expected to look like a starter. Nobody with a brain expected him to impress, only to show some progression and capability. He has. Not at a starter level, but for a young raw kid, he's showing most people a little bit of ability. He looks like a kid with good physical tools, good mechanics and footwork, and improvisational talent when needed.

He has promise. He isn't ready. To write him off as a bust now is dumb. To say anything more glowing than is typed here is dumb. Can we just lock this thread now? We're all worse off now for reading some of these takes.

Our point is he actually looks like he would have been worth more reps this camp if not for Rhules confusion.

Nobody gets to the level this kid has without talent. Of course he could've played, with a better line. PJ got twisted up too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, top dawg said:

Yeah, OK.

Manning is arguably the most notable. 

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.nfl.com/_amp/troy-aikman-peyton-manning-among-qbs-with-bad-first-starts-0ap3000000445192

I'm not trying to prove anything, just stating information. Furthermore,  no one can prove anything to a person who's not receptive or has made up their mind about something.

If you don't see what others see, that's your prerogative. But, patience really is a virtue in the face of knee-jerk reactions.

He looks bad so far. The other rookies look better. That's it, that's all. No one is saying to cut the kid. You're just twisting in the wind.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, GOAT said:

he looks confused and frantic. it's funny that he went to Oaks like Jimmy, they really do look a lot a like. That release is nice but when you're just gunning it at people that arent ready or finished with their route, it just looks like you're way off target.

the one play that really told me he wasn't an NFL QB was against the redskins when he was getting sacked and tried to get rid of it which resulted in a fumble. He got bailed out by a penalty.

I'm bummed, I was really rooting him on trust.

Against who?

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Jaxel said:

Matt might have a broken foot at this point, so it may be moot.

This is the bigger issue than how he looked. Durability was a concern in his draft profile and he missed most of the draft build up because he got hurt (foot/ankle) in his bowl game. 

I don't know what his ceiling might be, but if he can't stay healthy, he can't help the team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/13/2022 at 4:07 PM, NAS said:

Not the start he wanted, completely lacked composure today.  He should have been allowed to play behind a better offensive line.  He was rattled early and never recovered.  

You know what you have with PJ yet they insist on giving him bulk of the quality reps. 

The sooner rule's gone the better off he and the Panthers will be.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, rippadonn said:

Think About It Thinking GIF by For(bes) The Culture

He actually looks good. With reps and actually playing football he may have been ready to be QB1(with the right coach) or QB2.

I was just thinking of Matt Moore the other day. He had a better than average career. Matt Moore would actually win this "QB Competition".

Corral is a slightly more skilled, more mobile Matt Moore. I think that's his career trajectory. Once he bulks up a little, gets stronger he'll be a problem.

He looks very good at times in spite of Matt Rhules sabotage.

Revisionist history - Moore was a competent backup, but found out any time he had to start for an extended period of time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Nobody is saying we don't need it, just that we have bigger needs elsewhere, and that type of WR is actually something that is often found in the mid rounds, you just have to scout and evaluate properly. Here's another way of looking at why WR in the 1st shouldn't even be considered an option. Looking only at players currently on the team, what position group would you feel strongest about 4 years from now? I'm not sure there is a better answer there than WR, as you have to think T-Mac is our best player on the team in 4 years (Brown is the only current player I think there is even an argument to be made over T-Mac there), with Coker not far behind. Our OL is too old to be considered, my opinions on Bryce is well known, Hubbard will be done by then and the rest of the RB is an unknown, Off-ball LB is maybe our biggest need, we only have 1 legit safety, it's certainly not TE, and our 2nd best CB right now will be 33 by then.   Brown should still be a beast as he'll only be 31, but nobody else on the DL projects to be that good in 4 years.  Edge rusher with Phillips, Scourton, and Princely is probably the only other possible answer than WR. So yes, that fast/shifty type of WR is 100% a need of ours, but we have so many other bigger needs both in the immediate and future, that to me, taking a WR in the 1st for the 3rd year in a row and having hit on another WR in the same time frame, just makes zero sense both currently and looking into the future.
    • Laughing at Slayton (Mooney or Calvin Austin III), but telling me that Coker is the next best thing since sliced bread...You laughing at Theo Johnson in reference to our guys too? LOL No one in their right mind thinks Nabers is anything but a stud (definitely top 10 if not 5 potential). You do realize that Thomas was in a new system with a furst-time coach last year (with a questionable QB to boot)? And yet still, it's possible that he eclipses even T-mac (not saying that he will). They didn't even mention Travis Hunter. In any event, we're not in the top half. Draft another legit receiver, and we will be. 
    • Absolutely, very fair assessment of the team. 
×
×
  • Create New...