Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

First impressions of McAdoo


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Situational awareness appears to have been vastly improved over previous play callers...

Play design looked pretty good, definitely saw receivers that were schemed open...

Not sure what the run/pass ratio was but it felt like it worked; did seem more run heavy in the red zone after the starters left the game...

Don't recall us having to call a time out because a playcall came in late, though at one point I thought PJ Walker had to use one out of confusion...

As always of course, there's only so much you can tell from a preseason game but again, these are only first impressions.

For what it's worth, they're good.

It’s all vanilla.  I don’t think you can judge anything.  NFL is all about team specific adjustments and game planning for each opponent. 

it’s not like people had their pitchforks out when TMJ was tearing up preseason ball with  the prior guy. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not too worried about the offense. 
 

MacAdoo looked good for running a vanilla scheme. Looks like we finally have a good stable of WR’s, as both Shi and Higgins look to be locks. TMJ gotta get healthy, and stay on the field, but if he doesn’t work out, I’m good with what we have behind him or possibly alongside him. 
 

The 1st thru 3rd quarters, I was pleased. 4th quarter was a dub, but we we’re fielding scrubs at that time. Scrubs that are worse than the other scrubs most teams have available to them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I really liked the down and distance management early on. On the first drive we consistently got into 3rd and short and converted. It's a lot easier to convert 3rd and 3 vs. 3rd and 8. At 3rd and short you have you're full playbook available.

Same. I knew I was forgetting something.

2 minutes ago, CRA said:

It’s all vanilla.  I don’t think you can judge anything.  

Hence why it's only "first impressions"...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Team stats

38 passing plays, 30 rushing attempts.

4 penalties ( off and def)...Washington had 6

no fumbles, no interceptions

Time of possession...Wash 31:12, Panthers 28:48 (turnovers influenced this)

Total Plays:  Panthers 71, Wash 66

3rd down efficiency  Panthers  11-18,  Wash 8-14 (Wash also 2-2 on 4th down)

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
    • I just saw the funniest thing...or very disappointing, depending how you handle misery. A guy on YouTube did a 2027 'way too early' mock draft.  If I told you the simulator has the Panthers selecting in the top 10 , what would you say?  If I told you it was pick #8 and only two QBs were taken in the top 7, what would you say?  If I told you this dude had us taking a defensive player, what would you say?
    • It is due diligence at that point. Irresponsible not to take him.  Crossing my fingers on this one, he has everything you look for except experience.  
×
×
  • Create New...