Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Where were you when...


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, cookinbrak said:

I even remember exactly what I said.

(Smith catches the ball, cuts inside towards the middle of the field, and takes off)

"Get inside, inside, first down! RUN, MOTHERFU**ER  RUNRUNRUN SH*T HOLY SH*T!!"

I'd imagine many similar statements were made around that same time 😕

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was watching the game at home with my wife, 4 year old and 1 year old sons who are Panthers fans. I was 40 years old at the time and we went crazy as soon as Smitty caught it.

I was screaming "HE’S GONNA SCORE! HE’S GONNA SCORE! IT'S OVER BABY!"  My 4 year old was dancing all over the living room and my wife was in tears. She couldn't believe it and was shaking all over. She was a reck by the time the second overtime started.  So was I honestly. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, TheCasillas said:

Standing in middle of my parents living room jumping up and down with tears running down my face. I was 15 at the time. 

this. I just remember the house also being hot as hell and I would go outside every commercial break to cool TF off.... the emotional roller coaster of that game....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Watched the game at work, which was at a sports bar, but requested the night off for the game.  I had recently moved to Raleigh and noticed the lack of Panthers following.  So needless to say there wasn't many avid Panthers fans there (like none) but people interested in the game because it was a NFL playoff game.  Being half crocked and yelling at the TV made me sort of a spectacle.  When X clown happen, I ran around the room dishing out high fives to strangers and co-workers alike.  It was awesome!

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, kungfoodude said:

Watching at home. Was losing my mind over the course of that game. So many crazy highs and lows.

In OT and I took off and put on the jersey like a maniac as plays went against us and for us.

The final play I was losing my mind.

Speaking of highs and lows, man that was one hell of a clutch interception by Manning to get the ball back when the Rams were driving and looking hot. I was excited when Steve made the catch especially with how open he was but 17 year old me flipped when the one Ram defender near him missed the tackle. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not trying to steal thunder here, but the following week in Philly had a great play as well (Foster 1 yd run).  Still, beating the Rams (I think they had a 14-game home winning streak) was awesome.  I was at my aunt's house and my cousin came in from KY. They arrived in OT.   She thought it was funny to stand in front of the TV.  I nearly lost a cousin that night.

Edited by MHS831
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
    • adamantium? adam? adam thielen super bowl game winning catch ?
    • You're really gonna pass up the opportunity to make a joke about skidmarks in underwear here?  Alright fine.
×
×
  • Create New...