Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Corral heading to IR


Floppin
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Carolina Cajun said:

I won't, but I wouldn't mind them cutting pj, I don't see a way they don't run with 3 though.  I stand by that the coaching staff wanted a way to not have to keep corral on the active roster, they did not want him taking up a roster spot and the injury was the excuse needed.

There already reports saying the 3 Qb plan might change with Corral injury.. PJ is gone Especially after last night and that's why he look so depressed in his interview..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

It’s not like we would have the worse qb situation in the nfl. Baker at 1 and Sam at 2, isn’t a horrible position to be in.

Upgrade compared to the last two years.

Baker at 1 is okay but Sam Darnold is not a better QB than PJ Walker. Both stink even as backups.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Sgt Schultz said:

That is true, but neither you nor I are on this staff.  Our concerns are a little longer term.  And it will be their problem if they survive this year.

Long term is a win win for me..

Baker does good we have a winning season and I get to enjoy watching football again..

Or 

Baker sucks Rhule gets fired and we get Either Stroud,Levi's, Richarson or Young,...

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, WOW!! said:

There already reports saying the 3 Qb plan might change with Corral injury.. PJ is gone Especially after last night and that's why he look so depressed in his interview..

Well, to keep Corral, even on IR, he has to be on the final 53.  So my guess is that it will be Corral, Darnold and Mayfield, with PJ on the practice squad (if he can be on the PS).  And then Corral goes to IR, and PJ gets called up if needed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Davidson Deac II said:

Well, to keep Corral, even on IR, he has to be on the final 53.  So my guess is that it will be Corral, Darnold and Mayfield, with PJ on the practice squad (if he can be on the PS).  And then Corral goes to IR, and PJ gets called up if needed.

You could keep PJ on the PS all year and only call him up in a emergency... Ain't nobody picking him up and keeping him on their active roster..

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Carl Spackler said:

Absolutely nothing that has happened so far has shown Rhule's handling of anything is correct.

He wasn't ready, that was clear.  He needed more time to sit back and learn.  Even though this was more of a fluke injury, injuries were also a concern and more time in the weight room and to know the playbook were obviously needed.  He wasnt the great qb immediately that some fans had delusionally hoped he would be.  No coaching from any coach would have changed that in a couple weeks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, WOW!! said:

Long term is a win win for me..

Baker does good we have a winning season and I get to enjoy watching football again..

Or 

Baker sucks Rhule gets fired and we get Either Stroud,Levi's, Richarson or Young,...

It does come down to that. 

The worst that happens with Mayfield is not that he sucks this season (the Rhule demise offsets that), but his "good even years, not so good in odd ones" continues and we get Rhule for another year or more as we go up and down like yoyos.

FWIW, I think Mayfield's down 2021 was more a product of injuries than anything.  Seems like Stefanski used Rivera's philosophy of "rub some dirt on it and get back in there."  Not saying he would not have had a down year by comparison to his 2020, but not as much down.

I was not an advocate of trading for him, but was okay with what we gave up and paid for him.  But it beats another season of Darnold and PJ, even if they are on the depth chart under him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hornets shooting has definitely cooled off to end the season 
    • Would be cool if Melo and Kon tied for the season league lead in 3’s.  Either that or Kon straight-up.
    • I love the bottom feeding approach.  Not to say I was the only one, but I was screaming to draft Coker and then screaming to get him in here as an UDFA.  There were criticisms about him, etc.  As a Gamecock baby (Dad was a Tight End for them when I was born) I was against Legette.  I wanted the kid from Georgia.   All that to say this:  I am afraid of drafting a WR (I spent some time today researching) a few of the top names: 1. Jordan Tyson.  MCL, ACL, NHL---he has injured everything he could that ends in "L" and some things not related to his body.  He will drop, and everyone will start getting excited around 15.   NO! take him off the board. 2. KC Concepcion.  I want to like him, but is he not John Metchie III II?  I can't stand drops. To me, the most important characteristic for a receiver is hands.  I do not buy the "He can be taught."  I disagree to a degree.  Catching a football at a high level when you are being hit by someone behind you as you run full speed across the field is more about concentration and focus than anything else. You gotta trust your eyes, your instincts, and your QB.  Hard to teach someone not to fear something that hits you that you cannot see.  Dropping passes gets into your head--that makes you second guess yourself.  if it doesn't, it should.  Either way, it is a mental issue.   3. Omar Cooper.  I like him enough, but at 19? No.  He is a good YAC guy with solid hands.  However, he had a good WR across from him, the best QB in the country, a pretty easy schedule (He had his best games against FCS schools) and I wonder how much of the route tree he ran.  I am torn, not sold.  Of the three just mentioned, he has the worst skillset but I would like him the best as our Z. Who then, do I want, you ask? If it has to be WR, trade back.  If you can't, draft the slow guy who can't get a good release.  1.  Denzel Boston.   If it has to be a WR at 19, I think I would take Denzel Boston.  His biggest criticism is the release (and 40 speed) but he had great hands and runs good routes. as the Z, which is what we need, he would be perfect because he could motion toward the LOS and even when on the LOS, he is off the ball.  Lets do some bottom fishing in Coker Lake: Round 2: Ted Hurst.  He is a model Z WR for this offense.  Drops too many balls to my liking, but as a second rounder, I can tolerate that a bit more than a first rounder.  Round 5: Kendrick Law (UK):  This is the guy I am most comfortable drafting.  His average route at KY was under 4 yards.  He is great at running after the catch.  Stats? don't look at the game stats--look at the measurables. A 42-inch vertical, a 10-foot-8 broad jump, and a 9.60 Relative Athletic Score place him among the most explosive receivers in this class. That kind of lower-body power, paired with his balance through contact and proven ability to generate yards after the catch, gives him a real foundation to develop beyond what Kentucky asked of him. I think they were considering drafting a WR in the first round.  I get it, but as with the tackles in round 1, "Buyer Beware."  I have not given up on XL but I am very concerned that his mind is not right for the NFL. 
×
×
  • Create New...