Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

BS: IF There's A Team That COULD Be This Year's Version Of The 2021 Bengals, It's The Carolina Panthers


TheCasillas
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, TrevorLaurenceTime22 said:

Tell me again how they are always spot on?

I mean they generally are spot on.  The goal of the line isn’t to actually get it right.  It’s for the masses to be equally split on what might happen.  7 seems about perfect.   Hard to argue going over or under 7 right now.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, mrcompletely11 said:

I said "for the most part" I sure as hell said there were not 100%,  I clearly indicted there were exceptions to the rules.  But for the most part they are pretty accurate

 

https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/2021-nfl-win-totals-odds-predictions-best-bets-proven-expert-picks-under-six-wins-for-jets/

 

feel free to cross reference here

@mrcompletely11 has a point with this data. One thing to note though, "vegas" was off by 2 or more wins on 14 teams, or nearly half the league. In many cases, that didn't make much difference, the Panthers, Jags, Lions, Giants etc as they were all bottom tier teams and vegas had that part right, just the positioning is all wrong.

This 2 win differences make a much bigger difference in the middle and top half, where playoff positioning matters. My opinion, there is a much bigger difference between 10-7 and 8-9, compared to 5-12 and 3-14.

All in all though, it's impressive the accuracy is at least ballpark. The Bengals are the only real outlier and the others with a greater than 2 win difference were mostly bottom tier teams. They were projected to be garbage so that part was accurate.

23 minutes ago, TrevorLaurenceTime22 said:

One season of data that just by glass is 50/50...

 

I'll import a larger data set and use an excel SQL spreadsheet to break it down for you over a larger sample size.

This is also correct. More data is needed. Like 10 years or more.

Edited by Luciu5
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Luciu5 said:

@mrcompletely11 has a point with this data. One thing to note though, "vegas" was off by 2 or more wins on 14 teams, or nearly half the league. In many cases, that didn't make much difference, the Panthers, Jags, Lions, Giants etc as they were all bottom tier teams and vegas had that part right, just the positioning is all wrong.

This 2 win differences make a much bigger difference in the middle and top half, where playoff positioning matters. My opinion, there is a much bigger difference between 10-7 and 8-9, compared to 5-12 and 3-14.

All in all though, it's impressive the accuracy is at least ballpark. The Bengals are the only real outlier and the others with a greater than 2 win difference were mostly bottom tier teams. They were projected to be garbage so that part was accurate.

This is also correct. More data is needed. Like 10 years or more.

The article in op was in comparison to the Bengals of last year. Suddenly it’s hijacked by the same rhetoric…

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, TrevorLaurenceTime22 said:

Frankw rippadon just to add another few. 

I haven't entered the thread yet and I'm already in your head. Amusing. But I would be thrilled if Baker leads us to the playoffs. First I need to see this coaching staff field an OL that isn't bottom of the league though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, The Natural said:

There are posters here who I honestly think would be angry if we had a good season.

This is the unfortunate truth.

A lot of resident shitposters find comfort in being angry since that's their default state of existing. Pointing it out to them just gets that weirdo "Why are you complaining about complaining, I know you are but what am I" response. It is almost as if they have to gaslight others into being as enraged and miserable as they are.

It is what it is. Just put those posters on the ignore list and let them drown with the other sad bois.

Edited by Icege
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • ꧁༺✨❗Shop Now ❗✨༻꧂ https://worksupplement.com/biopeak-male-enhancement-buy ꧁༺✨❗Facebook Now❗✨༻꧂ https://www.facebook.com/BiopeakMaleEnhancementHealth/   ➥✅ Official Website: Biopeak Male Enhancement ➥✅ Product Name: Biopeak Male Enhancement ➥✅ Rating: ★★★★☆ (4.5/5.0) ➥✅ Side Effects: No Major Side Effects ➥✅ Availability: In Stock US   In the realm of male enhancement supplements, the market is flooded with promises of vitality, virility, and vigor. Amidst this sea of offerings, Biopeak Male Enhancement stands out as a beacon of hope for those seeking to reclaim their prowess and confidence in the bedroom. But what sets Biopeak apart from the rest? Let’s delve deeper into the science, ingredients, and user experiences to uncover the essence of this intriguing supplement.   FOR MORE INFO CLICK HERE :👇👇 https://www.facebook.com/BiopeakMaleEnhancementHealth/ https://sites.google.com/view/biopeakmaleenhancementshop/home https://sites.google.com/view/biopeakmaleenhancementhealth/home https://biopeak-male-enhancement-work.jimdosite.com/ https://biopeak-male-enhancement-price-1.jimdosite.com/ https://medium.com/@curtissfaulk/biopeak-male-enhancement-critical-customer-warning-up-to-75-off-7d7b99cb7f40 https://medium.com/@curtissfaulk/biopeak-male-enhancement-joyful-outcomes-and-accomplishments-wesley-50234a48ece4 https://biopeak-male-enhancement-offer.company.site/ https://www.townscript.com/e/biopeak-male-enhancement-serious-unsafe-side-effects-or-really-proven-to-work-413223 https://curtissfaulk.clubeo.com/calendar/2024/05/09/biopeak-male-enhancement-can-you-trust-official-website-claims https://biopeakmaleenhancementus2024.blogspot.com/2024/05/biopeak-male-enhancement.html https://biopeak-male-enhancement-fad057.webflow.io/   FACEBOOK@:- https://www.facebook.com/BiopeakMaleEnhancementHealth/ https://www.facebook.com/BioCoreCBDGummy/ https://www.facebook.com/Get.ReviveCBDGummiesReviews/ https://www.facebook.com/Get.ZenLeafCBDGummiesUS/
    • The If they have to pay the guys that generate the revenue, how do they support the parasitic programs?  You'd have to go purely by the numbers to keep the most self sufficient sports programs and as many of the lesser revenue producing programs as allowable. By the real numbers not some manufactured hierarchy.  Guess who loses that one. Will people allow them to lose? No there would be hell to pay. So here we go.
    • If I said more about why I see the league being part of the problem I couldn’t post.  Still love football, my dad was an example of the difference between college and pro. He ended up coaching for several years. I went on a couple of visits for college ball but knew I wasn’t NFL caliber and had some pretty compelling interests outside of athletics and here we are. I went another way. Still love football but seriously falling out of love with the NFL. Have zero love for Tepper.    edit: to stay OnTopic the wins come from facing teams that are down for whatever reason, that week. I don’t know how to know more specifics ahead of their random demises.
×
×
  • Create New...