Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers shopping TMJ?


NAS
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, WOW!! said:

@NAS really?? Are you board??

You really think it’s unbelievable that the Panthers could be looking to move on from him?
 

He has done absolutely nothing, can’t practice because he is always hurt, and we don’t know if they don’t like what he is like off the field. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, DeSim said:

rhule ruined him? i don’t like rhule either but cmon now.. lmao

Yeah, Rhule had to shelf him last year to get that big gait issue fixed he had last year.   The one only Rhule can see. Because that was apparently an issue per Matt Rhule.   That was around the time Rhule was talking about BC’s tiny TRex arms.  

Now he is apparently working on Baker’s mechanics and footwork

so far Rhule has had one rookie really pan out to date.  Chinn.  And he moved him after his breakout rookie year. 

Never doubt Matt Rhule

  • Pie 5
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CRA said:

Yeah, Rhule had to shelf him last year to get that big gait issue fixed he had last year.   The one only Rhule can see. Because that was apparently an issue per Matt Rhule.   That was around the time Rhule was talking about BC’s tiny TRex arms.  

Now he is apparently working on Baker’s mechanics and football.  

so far Rhule has had one rookie really pan out to date.  Chinn.  And he moved him after his breakout rookie year. 

Never doubt Matt Rhule

100%

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That's neither on Ickey nor Bryce, that's a coverage sack. There were plenty of examples where he drifted into pressure or didn't move in the right direction, but on this play we sent two men out deep and Max Protected with both TEs and the RB staying back to block. Both receivers were completely covered down the field with zero checkdown options and the pass rush got home. Bryce took a deep drop back due to the PA and to let the receivers get deeper. That was the play design This sack isn't "Clearly on the QB". There were plenty of examples where Bryce drifts in the pocket or bailed toward pressure last season (open up a random clip from the Jags game for examples), but this is not one of them. Blame Frank and his dumbass playcalling/design for sending two slow receivers who don't get open well on deep routes with no other options on this one.
    • Some things look horrible but you had the position covered. Some things look horrible because they really were.
    • Well this one is more like it, 28-3 Falcons in the 3rd before I just stopped.  Sorry.  Bryce lovers: watch the Chicago game not this one. Bet the farm on Bryce.
×
×
  • Create New...